Bevacizumab in High-Risk Corneal Transplantation : A Pilot Multicenter Prospective Randomized Control Trial
Copyright © 2022 American Academy of Ophthalmology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved..
PURPOSE: To determine the efficacy of local (subconjunctival and topical) bevacizumab (Avastin) treatment in patients undergoing vascularized high-risk corneal transplantation.
DESIGN: Pilot, prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial conducted at 5 clinical centers in the United States, India, and Brazil.
PARTICIPANTS: Patients aged > 18 years undergoing high-risk penetrating keratoplasty, defined as corneal neovascularization (NV) in 1 or more quadrants ≥2 mm from the limbus or extension of corneal NV to the graft-host junction in a previously failed graft.
METHODS: Patients were randomized to receive subconjunctival bevacizumab (2.5 mg/0.1 ml) or placebo at the time of surgery, followed by topical bevacizumab (10 mg/ml) or topical placebo, administered 4 times per day for 4 weeks.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: The 52-week endothelial immune rejection rate.
RESULTS: Ninety-two patients were randomized to receive bevacizumab (n = 48) or control (n = 44). The 52-week endothelial rejection rate was 10% in the bevacizumab group and 19% in the control group (P = 0.20). Post hoc, extended follow-up at the lead study site showed an endothelial rejection rate of 3% in the bevacizumab group and 38% in the control group (P = 0.003). Treatment with bevacizumab was found to have a hazard ratio of 0.15 (95% confidence interval, 0.03-0.65, P = 0.01) in a post hoc Cox regression analysis.
CONCLUSIONS: In patients undergoing vascularized high-risk corneal transplantation, there was no statistically significant difference in the rate of endothelial rejection at 1 year in the bevacizumab treatment group compared with the control group. This study may have been underpowered to detect a difference between treatment groups, and taken together, our data suggest that, in the current trial design, bevacizumab has a positive but not (yet) significant effect on endothelial rejection.
Errataetall: |
ErratumIn: Ophthalmology. 2022 Nov;129(11):1334. - PMID 36272763 |
---|---|
Medienart: |
E-Artikel |
Erscheinungsjahr: |
2022 |
---|---|
Erschienen: |
2022 |
Enthalten in: |
Zur Gesamtaufnahme - volume:129 |
---|---|
Enthalten in: |
Ophthalmology - 129(2022), 8 vom: 09. Aug., Seite 865-879 |
Sprache: |
Englisch |
---|
Beteiligte Personen: |
Dohlman, Thomas H [VerfasserIn] |
---|
Links: |
---|
Anmerkungen: |
Date Completed 26.07.2022 Date Revised 24.12.2023 published: Print-Electronic ErratumIn: Ophthalmology. 2022 Nov;129(11):1334. - PMID 36272763 Citation Status MEDLINE |
---|
doi: |
10.1016/j.ophtha.2022.03.024 |
---|
funding: |
|
---|---|
Förderinstitution / Projekttitel: |
|
PPN (Katalog-ID): |
NLM338885935 |
---|
LEADER | 01000caa a22002652 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | NLM338885935 | ||
003 | DE-627 | ||
005 | 20231227140645.0 | ||
007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
008 | 231226s2022 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
024 | 7 | |a 10.1016/j.ophtha.2022.03.024 |2 doi | |
028 | 5 | 2 | |a pubmed24n1237.xml |
035 | |a (DE-627)NLM338885935 | ||
035 | |a (NLM)35358592 | ||
035 | |a (PII)S0161-6420(22)00237-8 | ||
040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
041 | |a eng | ||
100 | 1 | |a Dohlman, Thomas H |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 0 | |a Bevacizumab in High-Risk Corneal Transplantation |b A Pilot Multicenter Prospective Randomized Control Trial |
264 | 1 | |c 2022 | |
336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |a ƒaComputermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |a ƒa Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
500 | |a Date Completed 26.07.2022 | ||
500 | |a Date Revised 24.12.2023 | ||
500 | |a published: Print-Electronic | ||
500 | |a ErratumIn: Ophthalmology. 2022 Nov;129(11):1334. - PMID 36272763 | ||
500 | |a Citation Status MEDLINE | ||
520 | |a Copyright © 2022 American Academy of Ophthalmology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. | ||
520 | |a PURPOSE: To determine the efficacy of local (subconjunctival and topical) bevacizumab (Avastin) treatment in patients undergoing vascularized high-risk corneal transplantation | ||
520 | |a DESIGN: Pilot, prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial conducted at 5 clinical centers in the United States, India, and Brazil | ||
520 | |a PARTICIPANTS: Patients aged > 18 years undergoing high-risk penetrating keratoplasty, defined as corneal neovascularization (NV) in 1 or more quadrants ≥2 mm from the limbus or extension of corneal NV to the graft-host junction in a previously failed graft | ||
520 | |a METHODS: Patients were randomized to receive subconjunctival bevacizumab (2.5 mg/0.1 ml) or placebo at the time of surgery, followed by topical bevacizumab (10 mg/ml) or topical placebo, administered 4 times per day for 4 weeks | ||
520 | |a MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: The 52-week endothelial immune rejection rate | ||
520 | |a RESULTS: Ninety-two patients were randomized to receive bevacizumab (n = 48) or control (n = 44). The 52-week endothelial rejection rate was 10% in the bevacizumab group and 19% in the control group (P = 0.20). Post hoc, extended follow-up at the lead study site showed an endothelial rejection rate of 3% in the bevacizumab group and 38% in the control group (P = 0.003). Treatment with bevacizumab was found to have a hazard ratio of 0.15 (95% confidence interval, 0.03-0.65, P = 0.01) in a post hoc Cox regression analysis | ||
520 | |a CONCLUSIONS: In patients undergoing vascularized high-risk corneal transplantation, there was no statistically significant difference in the rate of endothelial rejection at 1 year in the bevacizumab treatment group compared with the control group. This study may have been underpowered to detect a difference between treatment groups, and taken together, our data suggest that, in the current trial design, bevacizumab has a positive but not (yet) significant effect on endothelial rejection | ||
650 | 4 | |a Journal Article | |
650 | 4 | |a Multicenter Study | |
650 | 4 | |a Randomized Controlled Trial | |
650 | 4 | |a Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural | |
650 | 4 | |a Research Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S. | |
650 | 4 | |a Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't | |
650 | 4 | |a Angiogenesis | |
650 | 4 | |a Corneal transplantation | |
650 | 4 | |a Neovascularization | |
650 | 4 | |a Penetrating keratoplasty | |
650 | 4 | |a Vascular endothelial growth factor | |
650 | 7 | |a Angiogenesis Inhibitors |2 NLM | |
650 | 7 | |a Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized |2 NLM | |
650 | 7 | |a Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor A |2 NLM | |
650 | 7 | |a Bevacizumab |2 NLM | |
650 | 7 | |a 2S9ZZM9Q9V |2 NLM | |
700 | 1 | |a McSoley, Matthew |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Amparo, Francisco |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Carreno-Galeano, Tatiana |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Wang, Mengyu |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Dastjerdi, Mohammad |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Singh, Rohan Bir |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Coco, Giulia |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Di Zazzo, Antonio |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Shikari, Hasanain |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Saboo, Ujwala |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Sippel, Kimberly |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Ciralsky, Jessica |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Yoo, Sonia H |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Sticca, Matheus |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Wakamatsu, Tais H |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Murthy, Somasheila |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Hamrah, Pedram |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Jurkunas, Ula |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Ciolino, Joseph B |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Gomes, Jose A P |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Perez, Victor L |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Yin, Jia |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Dana, Reza |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Ophthalmology |d 1993 |g 129(2022), 8 vom: 09. Aug., Seite 865-879 |w (DE-627)NLM000457019 |x 1549-4713 |7 nnns |
773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:129 |g year:2022 |g number:8 |g day:09 |g month:08 |g pages:865-879 |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2022.03.024 |3 Volltext |
912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
912 | |a GBV_NLM | ||
951 | |a AR | ||
952 | |d 129 |j 2022 |e 8 |b 09 |c 08 |h 865-879 |