Topical Pharmacologic Interventions Versus Active Control, Placebo, or No Treatment for Epidemic Keratoconjunctivitis : Findings From a Cochrane Systematic Review
Copyright © 2022 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved..
PURPOSE: To summarize key findings from a Cochrane systematic review of the effectiveness and safety of topical pharmacologic interventions compared with active control or placebo for epidemic keratoconjunctivitis (EKC).
DESIGN: Systematic review.
METHODS: We included randomized controlled trials that compared antiseptic agents, virustatic agents, or immune-modulating topical therapies with placebo or an active control. We adhered to Cochrane methods for trial selection, data extraction, risk of bias evaluation, and data synthesis.
RESULTS: Ten randomized controlled trials with 892 participants with acute or chronic EKC were included. Eight trials compared interventions with artificial tears or saline (n = 4) or with steroids (n = 4); two 3-arm trials contributed data to both comparisons. Estimates suggested that compared with tears, after povidone-iodine (PVP-I) alone (2 studies, 409 participants) more participants with acute EKC had resolution of symptoms (risk ratio [RR] 1.15 [95% confidence interval {CI} 1.07-1.24]) and signs (RR 3.19 [95% CI 2.29-4.45]) within 10 days. In 2 trials comparing treatments with steroid alone or steroid with levofloxacin, fewer eyes treated with PVP-I or polyvinyl alcohol iodine (PVA-I) plus steroid developed subepithelial infiltrates within 21 days (RR 0.08 [95% CI 0.01-0.55]; 69 eyes). No treatment was shown to improve resolution of infiltrates.
CONCLUSIONS: Low- to very low-level certainty of evidence suggested that PVP-I or PVA-I with steroid may confer some benefit in acute EKC, but imprecision from small sample sizes, the potential risk of bias from inadequate reporting or trial design, and variability in participant selection, outcome measurement, and reporting limit the amount and quality of evidence.
| Medienart: |
E-Artikel |
|---|
| Erscheinungsjahr: |
2022 |
|---|---|
| Erschienen: |
2022 |
| Enthalten in: |
Zur Gesamtaufnahme - volume:240 |
|---|---|
| Enthalten in: |
American journal of ophthalmology - 240(2022) vom: 23. Aug., Seite 265-275 |
| Sprache: |
Englisch |
|---|
| Beteiligte Personen: |
Liu, Su-Hsun [VerfasserIn] |
|---|
| Links: |
|---|
| Themen: |
85H0HZU99M |
|---|
| Anmerkungen: |
Date Completed 26.07.2022 Date Revised 02.08.2023 published: Print-Electronic Citation Status MEDLINE |
|---|
| doi: |
10.1016/j.ajo.2022.03.018 |
|---|
| funding: |
|
|---|---|
| Förderinstitution / Projekttitel: |
|
| PPN (Katalog-ID): |
NLM338619704 |
|---|
| LEADER | 01000naa a22002652 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | NLM338619704 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20231226001100.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 231226s2022 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1016/j.ajo.2022.03.018 |2 doi | |
| 028 | 5 | 2 | |a pubmed24n1128.xml |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)NLM338619704 | ||
| 035 | |a (NLM)35331686 | ||
| 035 | |a (PII)S0002-9394(22)00118-0 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Liu, Su-Hsun |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Topical Pharmacologic Interventions Versus Active Control, Placebo, or No Treatment for Epidemic Keratoconjunctivitis |b Findings From a Cochrane Systematic Review |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2022 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a ƒaComputermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a ƒa Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 500 | |a Date Completed 26.07.2022 | ||
| 500 | |a Date Revised 02.08.2023 | ||
| 500 | |a published: Print-Electronic | ||
| 500 | |a Citation Status MEDLINE | ||
| 520 | |a Copyright © 2022 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. | ||
| 520 | |a PURPOSE: To summarize key findings from a Cochrane systematic review of the effectiveness and safety of topical pharmacologic interventions compared with active control or placebo for epidemic keratoconjunctivitis (EKC) | ||
| 520 | |a DESIGN: Systematic review | ||
| 520 | |a METHODS: We included randomized controlled trials that compared antiseptic agents, virustatic agents, or immune-modulating topical therapies with placebo or an active control. We adhered to Cochrane methods for trial selection, data extraction, risk of bias evaluation, and data synthesis | ||
| 520 | |a RESULTS: Ten randomized controlled trials with 892 participants with acute or chronic EKC were included. Eight trials compared interventions with artificial tears or saline (n = 4) or with steroids (n = 4); two 3-arm trials contributed data to both comparisons. Estimates suggested that compared with tears, after povidone-iodine (PVP-I) alone (2 studies, 409 participants) more participants with acute EKC had resolution of symptoms (risk ratio [RR] 1.15 [95% confidence interval {CI} 1.07-1.24]) and signs (RR 3.19 [95% CI 2.29-4.45]) within 10 days. In 2 trials comparing treatments with steroid alone or steroid with levofloxacin, fewer eyes treated with PVP-I or polyvinyl alcohol iodine (PVA-I) plus steroid developed subepithelial infiltrates within 21 days (RR 0.08 [95% CI 0.01-0.55]; 69 eyes). No treatment was shown to improve resolution of infiltrates | ||
| 520 | |a CONCLUSIONS: Low- to very low-level certainty of evidence suggested that PVP-I or PVA-I with steroid may confer some benefit in acute EKC, but imprecision from small sample sizes, the potential risk of bias from inadequate reporting or trial design, and variability in participant selection, outcome measurement, and reporting limit the amount and quality of evidence | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Journal Article | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Review | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Systematic Review | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Anti-Infective Agents, Local |2 NLM | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Lubricant Eye Drops |2 NLM | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Povidone-Iodine |2 NLM | |
| 650 | 7 | |a 85H0HZU99M |2 NLM | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Hawkins, Barbara S |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Ren, Mark |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Ng, Sueko M |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Leslie, Louis |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Han, Genie |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Kuo, Irene C |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t American journal of ophthalmology |d 1945 |g 240(2022) vom: 23. Aug., Seite 265-275 |w (DE-627)NLM000124443 |x 1879-1891 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:240 |g year:2022 |g day:23 |g month:08 |g pages:265-275 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ajo.2022.03.018 |3 Volltext |
| 912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_NLM | ||
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| 952 | |d 240 |j 2022 |b 23 |c 08 |h 265-275 | ||