Biopsy-proven CKD etiology and outcomes : the Chronic Kidney Disease Japan Cohort (CKD-JAC) study

© The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the ERA..

BACKGROUND: The Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes guidelines advocate the cause-glomerular filtration rate (GFR)-albuminuria (CGA) classification for predicting outcomes. However, there is a dearth of data supporting the use of the cause of chronic kidney disease. This study aimed to address how to incorporate a prior biopsy-proven diagnosis in outcome prediction.

METHODS: We examined the association of biopsy-proven kidney disease diagnoses with kidney failure with replacement therapy (KFRT) and all-cause death before KFRT in patients with various biopsy-proven diagnoses (n = 778, analysis A) and patients with diabetes mellitus labeled with biopsy-proven diabetic nephropathy (DN), other biopsy-proven diseases and no biopsy (n = 1117, analysis B).

RESULTS: In analysis A, adding biopsy-proven diagnoses to the GFR-albuminuria (GA) classification improved the prediction of 8-year incidence of KFRT and all-cause death significantly regarding integrated discrimination improvement and net reclassification index. Fine-Gray (FG) models with KFRT as a competing event showed significantly higher subdistribution hazard ratios (SHRs) for all-cause death in nephrosclerosis {4.12 [95% confidence interval (CI) 1.11-15.2)], focal segmental glomerulosclerosis [3.77 (95% CI 1.09-13.1)]} and membranous nephropathy (MN) [2.91 (95% CI 1.02-8.30)] than in immunoglobulin A nephropathy (IgAN), while the Cox model failed to show significant associations. Crescentic glomerulonephritis had the highest risk of all-cause death [SHR 5.90 (95% CI 2.05-17.0)]. MN had a significantly lower risk of KFRT than IgAN [SHR 0.45 (95% CI 0.24-0.84)]. In analysis B, other biopsy-proven diseases had a lower risk of KFRT than biopsy-proven DN in the FG model, with death as a competing event [SHR 0.62 (95% CI 0.39-0.97)].

CONCLUSIONS: The CGA classification is of greater value in predicting outcomes than the GA classification.

Errataetall:

ErratumIn: Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2022 Oct 19;37(11):2296. - PMID 36007962

Medienart:

E-Artikel

Erscheinungsjahr:

2023

Erschienen:

2023

Enthalten in:

Zur Gesamtaufnahme - volume:38

Enthalten in:

Nephrology, dialysis, transplantation : official publication of the European Dialysis and Transplant Association - European Renal Association - 38(2023), 2 vom: 13. Feb., Seite 384-395

Sprache:

Englisch

Beteiligte Personen:

Hamano, Takayuki [VerfasserIn]
Imaizumi, Takahiro [VerfasserIn]
Hasegawa, Takeshi [VerfasserIn]
Fujii, Naohiko [VerfasserIn]
Komaba, Hirotaka [VerfasserIn]
Ando, Masahiko [VerfasserIn]
Nangaku, Masaomi [VerfasserIn]
Nitta, Kosaku [VerfasserIn]
Hirakata, Hideki [VerfasserIn]
Isaka, Yoshitaka [VerfasserIn]
Wada, Takashi [VerfasserIn]
Maruyama, Shoichi [VerfasserIn]
Fukagawa, Masafumi [VerfasserIn]

Links:

Volltext

Themen:

CKD
Diabetic kidney disease
Epidemiology
Journal Article
Kidney biopsy
Prognosis
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Anmerkungen:

Date Completed 14.02.2023

Date Revised 19.02.2023

published: Print

ErratumIn: Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2022 Oct 19;37(11):2296. - PMID 36007962

Citation Status MEDLINE

doi:

10.1093/ndt/gfac134

funding:

Förderinstitution / Projekttitel:

PPN (Katalog-ID):

NLM338542906