Carvedilol versus endoscopic band ligation for secondary prophylaxis of variceal bleeding-long-term follow-up of a randomised control trial
© 2022 John Wiley & Sons Ltd..
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Carvedilol reduces rates of variceal bleeding and rebleeding by lowering portal pressure. However, an associated pleiotropic survival benefit has been proposed. We aimed to assess long-term survival in a cohort of patients previously randomised to receive either carvedilol or endoscopic band ligation (EBL) following oesophageal variceal bleeding (OVB).
METHODS: The index study randomised 64 cirrhotic patients with OVB between 2006 and 2011 to receive either carvedilol or EBL. Follow-up was undertaken to April 2020 by review of electronic patient records. The primary outcome was survival. Other outcomes including variceal rebleeding and liver decompensation events were compared.
RESULTS: 26 out of 33 participants received carvedilol in the follow-up period and 28 out of 31 attended regular EBL sessions. The median number of follow-up days for all patients recruited was 1459 (SE = 281.74). On the intention to treat analysis, there was a trend towards improved survival in the carvedilol group (p = 0.09). On per-protocol analysis, carvedilol use was associated with improved long-term survival (p = 0.005, HR 3.083, 95% CI 1.397-6.809), fewer liver-related deaths (0% vs 22.57%, p = 0.013, OR ∞, 95%CI 1.565-∞) and fewer admissions with decompensated liver disease (12% vs 64.29%, p = 0.0002, OR 13.2, 95% CI 3.026-47.23) compared to the EBL group. There was no statistically significant difference in variceal rebleeding rates.
CONCLUSION: Following OVB in cirrhotic patients, carvedilol use is associated with survival benefit, fewer liver-related deaths and fewer hospital admissions with decompensated liver disease. Further studies are needed to validate this finding.
Errataetall: |
CommentIn: Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2022 Jul;56(1):186-187. - PMID 35689317 |
---|---|
Medienart: |
E-Artikel |
Erscheinungsjahr: |
2022 |
---|---|
Erschienen: |
2022 |
Enthalten in: |
Zur Gesamtaufnahme - volume:55 |
---|---|
Enthalten in: |
Alimentary pharmacology & therapeutics - 55(2022), 12 vom: 15. Juni, Seite 1581-1587 |
Sprache: |
Englisch |
---|
Beteiligte Personen: |
Dunne, Philip D J [VerfasserIn] |
---|
Links: |
---|
Themen: |
0K47UL67F2 |
---|
Anmerkungen: |
Date Completed 26.05.2022 Date Revised 23.06.2022 published: Print-Electronic CommentIn: Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2022 Jul;56(1):186-187. - PMID 35689317 Citation Status MEDLINE |
---|
doi: |
10.1111/apt.16901 |
---|
funding: |
|
---|---|
Förderinstitution / Projekttitel: |
|
PPN (Katalog-ID): |
NLM338532137 |
---|
LEADER | 01000naa a22002652 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | NLM338532137 | ||
003 | DE-627 | ||
005 | 20231226000901.0 | ||
007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
008 | 231226s2022 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
024 | 7 | |a 10.1111/apt.16901 |2 doi | |
028 | 5 | 2 | |a pubmed24n1128.xml |
035 | |a (DE-627)NLM338532137 | ||
035 | |a (NLM)35322892 | ||
040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
041 | |a eng | ||
100 | 1 | |a Dunne, Philip D J |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 0 | |a Carvedilol versus endoscopic band ligation for secondary prophylaxis of variceal bleeding-long-term follow-up of a randomised control trial |
264 | 1 | |c 2022 | |
336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |a ƒaComputermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |a ƒa Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
500 | |a Date Completed 26.05.2022 | ||
500 | |a Date Revised 23.06.2022 | ||
500 | |a published: Print-Electronic | ||
500 | |a CommentIn: Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2022 Jul;56(1):186-187. - PMID 35689317 | ||
500 | |a Citation Status MEDLINE | ||
520 | |a © 2022 John Wiley & Sons Ltd. | ||
520 | |a BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Carvedilol reduces rates of variceal bleeding and rebleeding by lowering portal pressure. However, an associated pleiotropic survival benefit has been proposed. We aimed to assess long-term survival in a cohort of patients previously randomised to receive either carvedilol or endoscopic band ligation (EBL) following oesophageal variceal bleeding (OVB) | ||
520 | |a METHODS: The index study randomised 64 cirrhotic patients with OVB between 2006 and 2011 to receive either carvedilol or EBL. Follow-up was undertaken to April 2020 by review of electronic patient records. The primary outcome was survival. Other outcomes including variceal rebleeding and liver decompensation events were compared | ||
520 | |a RESULTS: 26 out of 33 participants received carvedilol in the follow-up period and 28 out of 31 attended regular EBL sessions. The median number of follow-up days for all patients recruited was 1459 (SE = 281.74). On the intention to treat analysis, there was a trend towards improved survival in the carvedilol group (p = 0.09). On per-protocol analysis, carvedilol use was associated with improved long-term survival (p = 0.005, HR 3.083, 95% CI 1.397-6.809), fewer liver-related deaths (0% vs 22.57%, p = 0.013, OR ∞, 95%CI 1.565-∞) and fewer admissions with decompensated liver disease (12% vs 64.29%, p = 0.0002, OR 13.2, 95% CI 3.026-47.23) compared to the EBL group. There was no statistically significant difference in variceal rebleeding rates | ||
520 | |a CONCLUSION: Following OVB in cirrhotic patients, carvedilol use is associated with survival benefit, fewer liver-related deaths and fewer hospital admissions with decompensated liver disease. Further studies are needed to validate this finding | ||
650 | 4 | |a Journal Article | |
650 | 4 | |a Randomized Controlled Trial | |
650 | 7 | |a Carvedilol |2 NLM | |
650 | 7 | |a 0K47UL67F2 |2 NLM | |
700 | 1 | |a Young, David |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Chuah, Cher Shiong |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Hayes, Peter C |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Tripathi, Dhiraj |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Leithead, Joanna |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Smith, Lyn A |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Gaya, Daniel R |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Forrest, Ewan |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Stanley, Adrian J |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Alimentary pharmacology & therapeutics |d 1992 |g 55(2022), 12 vom: 15. Juni, Seite 1581-1587 |w (DE-627)NLM012692506 |x 1365-2036 |7 nnns |
773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:55 |g year:2022 |g number:12 |g day:15 |g month:06 |g pages:1581-1587 |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/apt.16901 |3 Volltext |
912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
912 | |a GBV_NLM | ||
951 | |a AR | ||
952 | |d 55 |j 2022 |e 12 |b 15 |c 06 |h 1581-1587 |