Validation of a Smartphone-Based Institutional Electronic Data Capture System for Thumb Carpometacarpal Joint Arthroplasty
BACKGROUND: The Orthopaedic Minimal Data Set (OrthoMiDaS) Episode of care (OME) is a prospectively collected database enabling capture of patient and surgeon-reported data in a more efficient, comprehensive, and dependable manner than electronic medical record (EMR) review. We aimed to assess and validate the OME as a data capture tool for carpometacarpal (CMC) arthroplasty compared to traditional EMR-based review. Specifically, we aimed to: (1) compare the completeness of the OME versus EMR data; and (2) evaluate the extent of agreement between the OME and EMR data-based datasets for carpometacarpal (CMC) arthroplasty.
METHODS: The first 100 thumb CMC arthroplasties after OME inception (Febuary, 2015) were included. Blinded EMR-based review of the same cases was performedfor 48 perioperative variables and compared to their OME-sourced counterparts. Outcomes included completion rates and agreement measures in OME versus EMR-based control datasets.
RESULTS: The OME demonstrated superior completion rates compared to EMR-based retrospective review. There was high agreement between both datasets where 75.6% (34/45) had an agreement proportion of >0.90% and 82.2% (37/45) had an agreement proportion of >0.80. Over 40% of the variables had almost perfect to substantial agreement (κ > 0.60). Among the 6 variables demonstrating poor agreement, the surgeon-inputted OME values were more accurate than the EMR-based review control.
CONCLUSIONS: This study validates the use of the OME for CMC arthroplasty by illustrating that it is reliably able to match or supersede traditional chart review for data collection; thereby offering a high-quality tool for future CMC arthroplasty studies.
Medienart: |
E-Artikel |
---|
Erscheinungsjahr: |
2023 |
---|---|
Erschienen: |
2023 |
Enthalten in: |
Zur Gesamtaufnahme - volume:18 |
---|---|
Enthalten in: |
Hand (New York, N.Y.) - 18(2023), 7 vom: 11. Okt., Seite 1135-1141 |
Sprache: |
Englisch |
---|
Beteiligte Personen: |
Chughtai, Morad [VerfasserIn] |
---|
Links: |
---|
Themen: |
Arthritis |
---|
Anmerkungen: |
Date Completed 23.10.2023 Date Revised 21.01.2024 published: Print-Electronic Citation Status MEDLINE |
---|
doi: |
10.1177/15589447221082163 |
---|
funding: |
|
---|---|
Förderinstitution / Projekttitel: |
|
PPN (Katalog-ID): |
NLM338519149 |
---|
LEADER | 01000caa a22002652 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | NLM338519149 | ||
003 | DE-627 | ||
005 | 20240121231822.0 | ||
007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
008 | 231226s2023 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
024 | 7 | |a 10.1177/15589447221082163 |2 doi | |
028 | 5 | 2 | |a pubmed24n1266.xml |
035 | |a (DE-627)NLM338519149 | ||
035 | |a (NLM)35321574 | ||
040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
041 | |a eng | ||
100 | 1 | |a Chughtai, Morad |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 0 | |a Validation of a Smartphone-Based Institutional Electronic Data Capture System for Thumb Carpometacarpal Joint Arthroplasty |
264 | 1 | |c 2023 | |
336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |a ƒaComputermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |a ƒa Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
500 | |a Date Completed 23.10.2023 | ||
500 | |a Date Revised 21.01.2024 | ||
500 | |a published: Print-Electronic | ||
500 | |a Citation Status MEDLINE | ||
520 | |a BACKGROUND: The Orthopaedic Minimal Data Set (OrthoMiDaS) Episode of care (OME) is a prospectively collected database enabling capture of patient and surgeon-reported data in a more efficient, comprehensive, and dependable manner than electronic medical record (EMR) review. We aimed to assess and validate the OME as a data capture tool for carpometacarpal (CMC) arthroplasty compared to traditional EMR-based review. Specifically, we aimed to: (1) compare the completeness of the OME versus EMR data; and (2) evaluate the extent of agreement between the OME and EMR data-based datasets for carpometacarpal (CMC) arthroplasty | ||
520 | |a METHODS: The first 100 thumb CMC arthroplasties after OME inception (Febuary, 2015) were included. Blinded EMR-based review of the same cases was performedfor 48 perioperative variables and compared to their OME-sourced counterparts. Outcomes included completion rates and agreement measures in OME versus EMR-based control datasets | ||
520 | |a RESULTS: The OME demonstrated superior completion rates compared to EMR-based retrospective review. There was high agreement between both datasets where 75.6% (34/45) had an agreement proportion of >0.90% and 82.2% (37/45) had an agreement proportion of >0.80. Over 40% of the variables had almost perfect to substantial agreement (κ > 0.60). Among the 6 variables demonstrating poor agreement, the surgeon-inputted OME values were more accurate than the EMR-based review control | ||
520 | |a CONCLUSIONS: This study validates the use of the OME for CMC arthroplasty by illustrating that it is reliably able to match or supersede traditional chart review for data collection; thereby offering a high-quality tool for future CMC arthroplasty studies | ||
650 | 4 | |a Journal Article | |
650 | 4 | |a CMC | |
650 | 4 | |a OME | |
650 | 4 | |a OrthoMidas episode of care | |
650 | 4 | |a arthritis | |
650 | 4 | |a complications | |
650 | 4 | |a database | |
650 | 4 | |a dataset | |
650 | 4 | |a diagnosis | |
650 | 4 | |a perioperative outcomes | |
650 | 4 | |a prospective | |
650 | 4 | |a surgical details | |
700 | 1 | |a Scollan, Joseph P |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Emara, Ahmed K |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Jin, Yuxuan |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Evans, Peter J |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Shapiro, David B |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Styron, Joseph F |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Hand (New York, N.Y.) |d 2006 |g 18(2023), 7 vom: 11. Okt., Seite 1135-1141 |w (DE-627)NLM182315967 |x 1558-9455 |7 nnns |
773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:18 |g year:2023 |g number:7 |g day:11 |g month:10 |g pages:1135-1141 |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/15589447221082163 |3 Volltext |
912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
912 | |a GBV_NLM | ||
951 | |a AR | ||
952 | |d 18 |j 2023 |e 7 |b 11 |c 10 |h 1135-1141 |