The different overall survival between single-agent EGFR-TKI treatment and with bevacizumab in non-small cell lung cancer patients with brain metastasis
© 2022. The Author(s)..
Comparison of epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor (EGFR-TKI) monotherapy or with bevacizumab in real-world non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients was lacking. 310 patients of advanced NSCLC with common EGFR mutation receiving first-generation EGFR-TKI monotherapy or with bevacizumab were included and propensity-score matched. Progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS) and secondary T790M mutation were analysed. Patients receiving EGFR-TKI and bevacizumab were significantly younger, had better performance status and with high incidence of brain metastasis (55.8%). In the propensity-score matched cohort, PFS (13.5 vs. 13.7 months; log-rank p = 0.700) was similar between the two groups. The OS (61.3 vs. 34.2 months; log-rank p = 0.010) and risk reduction of death (HR 0.42 [95% CI 0.20-0.85]; p = 0.017) were significantly improved in EGFR-TKI plus bevacizumab group. Analysis of treatment by brain metastasis status demonstrated EGFR-TKI plus bevacizumab in patients with brain metastasis was associated with significant OS benefit compared to other groups (log-rank p = 0.030) and these patients had lower early-CNS and early-systemic progressions. The secondary T790M did not significantly differ between EGFR-TKI plus bevacizumab and EGFR-TKI monotherapy groups (66.7% vs. 75.0%, p = 0.460). Forty-one (31.1%) and 31 (23.5%) patients received subsequent osimertinib and chemotherapy, respectively. The post-progression OS of osimertinib and chemotherapy were 22.1 and 44.9 months in EGFR-TKI plus bevacizumab group and were 10.0 and 14.1 months in EGFR-TKI monotherpay group, respectively. First-generation EGFR-TKI with bevacizumab improved treatment efficacy in real-world patients of NSCLC with EGFR mutation. Patients with brain metastasis received additional OS benefit from this treatment.
| Medienart: |
E-Artikel |
|---|
| Erscheinungsjahr: |
2022 |
|---|---|
| Erschienen: |
2022 |
| Enthalten in: |
Zur Gesamtaufnahme - volume:12 |
|---|---|
| Enthalten in: |
Scientific reports - 12(2022), 1 vom: 15. März, Seite 4398 |
| Sprache: |
Englisch |
|---|
| Beteiligte Personen: |
Chiu, Tzu-Hsuan [VerfasserIn] |
|---|
| Links: |
|---|
| Themen: |
2S9ZZM9Q9V |
|---|
| Anmerkungen: |
Date Completed 28.04.2022 Date Revised 28.04.2022 published: Electronic Citation Status MEDLINE |
|---|
| doi: |
10.1038/s41598-022-08449-w |
|---|
| funding: |
|
|---|---|
| Förderinstitution / Projekttitel: |
|
| PPN (Katalog-ID): |
NLM338234357 |
|---|
| LEADER | 01000naa a22002652 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | NLM338234357 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20231226204353.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 231226s2022 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1038/s41598-022-08449-w |2 doi | |
| 028 | 5 | 2 | |a pubmed24n1127.xml |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)NLM338234357 | ||
| 035 | |a (NLM)35292755 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Chiu, Tzu-Hsuan |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 4 | |a The different overall survival between single-agent EGFR-TKI treatment and with bevacizumab in non-small cell lung cancer patients with brain metastasis |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2022 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a ƒaComputermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a ƒa Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 500 | |a Date Completed 28.04.2022 | ||
| 500 | |a Date Revised 28.04.2022 | ||
| 500 | |a published: Electronic | ||
| 500 | |a Citation Status MEDLINE | ||
| 520 | |a © 2022. The Author(s). | ||
| 520 | |a Comparison of epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor (EGFR-TKI) monotherapy or with bevacizumab in real-world non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients was lacking. 310 patients of advanced NSCLC with common EGFR mutation receiving first-generation EGFR-TKI monotherapy or with bevacizumab were included and propensity-score matched. Progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS) and secondary T790M mutation were analysed. Patients receiving EGFR-TKI and bevacizumab were significantly younger, had better performance status and with high incidence of brain metastasis (55.8%). In the propensity-score matched cohort, PFS (13.5 vs. 13.7 months; log-rank p = 0.700) was similar between the two groups. The OS (61.3 vs. 34.2 months; log-rank p = 0.010) and risk reduction of death (HR 0.42 [95% CI 0.20-0.85]; p = 0.017) were significantly improved in EGFR-TKI plus bevacizumab group. Analysis of treatment by brain metastasis status demonstrated EGFR-TKI plus bevacizumab in patients with brain metastasis was associated with significant OS benefit compared to other groups (log-rank p = 0.030) and these patients had lower early-CNS and early-systemic progressions. The secondary T790M did not significantly differ between EGFR-TKI plus bevacizumab and EGFR-TKI monotherapy groups (66.7% vs. 75.0%, p = 0.460). Forty-one (31.1%) and 31 (23.5%) patients received subsequent osimertinib and chemotherapy, respectively. The post-progression OS of osimertinib and chemotherapy were 22.1 and 44.9 months in EGFR-TKI plus bevacizumab group and were 10.0 and 14.1 months in EGFR-TKI monotherpay group, respectively. First-generation EGFR-TKI with bevacizumab improved treatment efficacy in real-world patients of NSCLC with EGFR mutation. Patients with brain metastasis received additional OS benefit from this treatment | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Journal Article | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Protein Kinase Inhibitors |2 NLM | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Bevacizumab |2 NLM | |
| 650 | 7 | |a 2S9ZZM9Q9V |2 NLM | |
| 650 | 7 | |a EGFR protein, human |2 NLM | |
| 650 | 7 | |a EC 2.7.10.1 |2 NLM | |
| 650 | 7 | |a ErbB Receptors |2 NLM | |
| 650 | 7 | |a EC 2.7.10.1 |2 NLM | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Tung, Pi-Hung |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Huang, Chi-Hsien |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Ju, Jia-Shiuan |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Huang, Allen Chung-Cheng |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Wang, Chin-Chou |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Ko, Ho-Wen |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Hsu, Ping-Chih |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Fang, Yueh-Fu |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Guo, Yi-Ke |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Kuo, Chih-Hsi Scott |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Yang, Cheng-Ta |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Scientific reports |d 2011 |g 12(2022), 1 vom: 15. März, Seite 4398 |w (DE-627)NLM215703936 |x 2045-2322 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:12 |g year:2022 |g number:1 |g day:15 |g month:03 |g pages:4398 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-08449-w |3 Volltext |
| 912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_NLM | ||
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| 952 | |d 12 |j 2022 |e 1 |b 15 |c 03 |h 4398 | ||