A modified Delphi study to identify screening items to assess neglected sexual side-effects following prostate cancer treatment
© 2022. The Author(s)..
BACKGROUND: Neglected sexual side effects (NSSE) are a group of less common sexual side effects that may present after Prostate Cancer (PCa) treatment. There is currently no valid and reliable tool to identify these side effects. A modified Delphi study is an effective way of developing the content of such a screening tool.
METHODS: A modified Delphi study was used to obtain consensus from a multi-disciplinary group of experts over 3 rounds during a 12 week period. Ten statements were presented containing 8 closed-ended statements on individual NSSEs, and 2 open-ended statements on psychosocial impact related to NSSE. Consensus was defined as a 75% strongly agree achievement on each statement, or the final statement evolution at the end of 3 rounds. Statement support in each round was determined by mean, standard deviation and range, after a numerical value was allocated to each statement during specific rounds. All three rounds were structured and suggestions and additions were incorporated in the statement evolution of the three rounds.
RESULTS: Thirty-five participants were invited, and 27 completed Round 1 (RD 1), 23 participants completed RD2, and 20 participants completed RD3. All 3 rounds were completed in 12 weeks. Statement 1 (sexual arousal incontinence), statement 2 (climacturia) and statement 3 (orgasm intensity) reached consensus after RD2, and statement 9 (sexual dysfunction impact) and statement 10 (experiences) were removed after RD3. Statement 4 (orgasmic pain), statement 5 (anejaculation), statement 6 (sensory disturbances), statement 7 (penile length shortening) and statement 8 (penile curvature) were finalised after the conclusion of RD3. Statements 1-3 were the most stable statements with the most support and least amount of disagreement. Statements 4-8 were less stable, but support for them improved over the 3 rounds. Statements 9-10 both had good stability, but the support indicated that they needed to be removed from the set of statements. Statement 5 had the poorest range due to an outlier opinion.
CONCLUSIONS: Consensus was reached on the items making up the NSSE screening tool. Health care practitioners will be able to use this tool to identify the evidence of NSSE after PCa treatment. Further testing will be undertaken to confirm the reliability and validly of the tool.
| Medienart: |
E-Artikel |
|---|
| Erscheinungsjahr: |
2022 |
|---|---|
| Erschienen: |
2022 |
| Enthalten in: |
Zur Gesamtaufnahme - volume:22 |
|---|---|
| Enthalten in: |
BMC urology - 22(2022), 1 vom: 11. März, Seite 34 |
| Sprache: |
Englisch |
|---|
| Beteiligte Personen: |
Röscher, Pierre [VerfasserIn] |
|---|
| Links: |
|---|
| Themen: |
|---|
| Anmerkungen: |
Date Completed 17.03.2022 Date Revised 19.03.2022 published: Electronic Citation Status MEDLINE |
|---|
| doi: |
10.1186/s12894-022-00982-0 |
|---|
| funding: |
|
|---|---|
| Förderinstitution / Projekttitel: |
|
| PPN (Katalog-ID): |
NLM338079653 |
|---|
| LEADER | 01000naa a22002652 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | NLM338079653 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20231225235848.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 231225s2022 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1186/s12894-022-00982-0 |2 doi | |
| 028 | 5 | 2 | |a pubmed24n1126.xml |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)NLM338079653 | ||
| 035 | |a (NLM)35277157 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Röscher, Pierre |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 2 | |a A modified Delphi study to identify screening items to assess neglected sexual side-effects following prostate cancer treatment |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2022 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a ƒaComputermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a ƒa Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 500 | |a Date Completed 17.03.2022 | ||
| 500 | |a Date Revised 19.03.2022 | ||
| 500 | |a published: Electronic | ||
| 500 | |a Citation Status MEDLINE | ||
| 520 | |a © 2022. The Author(s). | ||
| 520 | |a BACKGROUND: Neglected sexual side effects (NSSE) are a group of less common sexual side effects that may present after Prostate Cancer (PCa) treatment. There is currently no valid and reliable tool to identify these side effects. A modified Delphi study is an effective way of developing the content of such a screening tool | ||
| 520 | |a METHODS: A modified Delphi study was used to obtain consensus from a multi-disciplinary group of experts over 3 rounds during a 12 week period. Ten statements were presented containing 8 closed-ended statements on individual NSSEs, and 2 open-ended statements on psychosocial impact related to NSSE. Consensus was defined as a 75% strongly agree achievement on each statement, or the final statement evolution at the end of 3 rounds. Statement support in each round was determined by mean, standard deviation and range, after a numerical value was allocated to each statement during specific rounds. All three rounds were structured and suggestions and additions were incorporated in the statement evolution of the three rounds | ||
| 520 | |a RESULTS: Thirty-five participants were invited, and 27 completed Round 1 (RD 1), 23 participants completed RD2, and 20 participants completed RD3. All 3 rounds were completed in 12 weeks. Statement 1 (sexual arousal incontinence), statement 2 (climacturia) and statement 3 (orgasm intensity) reached consensus after RD2, and statement 9 (sexual dysfunction impact) and statement 10 (experiences) were removed after RD3. Statement 4 (orgasmic pain), statement 5 (anejaculation), statement 6 (sensory disturbances), statement 7 (penile length shortening) and statement 8 (penile curvature) were finalised after the conclusion of RD3. Statements 1-3 were the most stable statements with the most support and least amount of disagreement. Statements 4-8 were less stable, but support for them improved over the 3 rounds. Statements 9-10 both had good stability, but the support indicated that they needed to be removed from the set of statements. Statement 5 had the poorest range due to an outlier opinion | ||
| 520 | |a CONCLUSIONS: Consensus was reached on the items making up the NSSE screening tool. Health care practitioners will be able to use this tool to identify the evidence of NSSE after PCa treatment. Further testing will be undertaken to confirm the reliability and validly of the tool | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Consensus Development Conference | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Journal Article | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Naidoo, Kimesh |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Milios, Joanne E |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a van Wyk, Jacqueline M |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t BMC urology |d 2001 |g 22(2022), 1 vom: 11. März, Seite 34 |w (DE-627)NLM114435138 |x 1471-2490 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:22 |g year:2022 |g number:1 |g day:11 |g month:03 |g pages:34 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12894-022-00982-0 |3 Volltext |
| 912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_NLM | ||
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| 952 | |d 22 |j 2022 |e 1 |b 11 |c 03 |h 34 | ||