A robotic approach to management of failed sacrocolpopexy and sacrocolpopexy complications : a case series
© 2022. The International Urogynecological Association..
INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: Approximately 5% of patients pursue reoperation after sacrocolpopexy (SCP). Reasons for re-operation include recurrence of prolapse, mesh erosion, bowel and bladder dysfunction, and pain. We aim to describe patient presentation, intraoperative findings, and subsequent robotic approach to management of SCP failures and complications.
METHODS: This is a case series of patients who underwent abdominal re-exploration after SCP over 7 years at a single institution. Demographic data, previous prolapse surgery, presenting complaint, prolapse stage, operative notes, and outcomes were reviewed. Nineteen patients were identified by CPT codes; ten met inclusion criteria.
RESULTS: Seven of the ten patients presented with vaginal bulge, urinary frequency and urgency; four also had stress urinary incontinence. Two patients presented with vaginal bleeding and another with vaginal pain. Operative findings on reoperation for patients who had vaginal bulge included detachment from the vagina or cervix (n = 4, 57%) and the anterior longitudinal ligament (n = 3, 43%). Of these, two had their SCP mesh reattached, and five had SCP mesh removal and replacement. The patients with vaginal bleeding and pain underwent mesh excisions. All ten patients had uncomplicated postoperative courses with resolution of symptoms in most cases.
CONCLUSIONS: Prolapse recurrence and complications after SCP have a significant impact on patient quality of life. Recurrent prolapse after SCP theoretically occurs because of mesh detachment from the cervix/vagina, the anterior longitudinal ligament, or disruption/stretching of the mesh. Our case series demonstrates that abdominal re-exploration is feasible and valuable in these rare cases.
| Medienart: |
E-Artikel |
|---|
| Erscheinungsjahr: |
2022 |
|---|---|
| Erschienen: |
2022 |
| Enthalten in: |
Zur Gesamtaufnahme - volume:33 |
|---|---|
| Enthalten in: |
International urogynecology journal - 33(2022), 11 vom: 17. Nov., Seite 3231-3236 |
| Sprache: |
Englisch |
|---|
| Beteiligte Personen: |
Goodwin, Alexandra I [VerfasserIn] |
|---|
| Links: |
|---|
| Themen: |
Complications |
|---|
| Anmerkungen: |
Date Completed 18.10.2022 Date Revised 06.12.2022 published: Print-Electronic Citation Status MEDLINE |
|---|
| doi: |
10.1007/s00192-022-05134-4 |
|---|
| funding: |
|
|---|---|
| Förderinstitution / Projekttitel: |
|
| PPN (Katalog-ID): |
NLM337979081 |
|---|
| LEADER | 01000naa a22002652 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | NLM337979081 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20231225235635.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 231225s2022 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1007/s00192-022-05134-4 |2 doi | |
| 028 | 5 | 2 | |a pubmed24n1126.xml |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)NLM337979081 | ||
| 035 | |a (NLM)35267061 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Goodwin, Alexandra I |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 2 | |a A robotic approach to management of failed sacrocolpopexy and sacrocolpopexy complications |b a case series |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2022 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a ƒaComputermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a ƒa Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 500 | |a Date Completed 18.10.2022 | ||
| 500 | |a Date Revised 06.12.2022 | ||
| 500 | |a published: Print-Electronic | ||
| 500 | |a Citation Status MEDLINE | ||
| 520 | |a © 2022. The International Urogynecological Association. | ||
| 520 | |a INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: Approximately 5% of patients pursue reoperation after sacrocolpopexy (SCP). Reasons for re-operation include recurrence of prolapse, mesh erosion, bowel and bladder dysfunction, and pain. We aim to describe patient presentation, intraoperative findings, and subsequent robotic approach to management of SCP failures and complications | ||
| 520 | |a METHODS: This is a case series of patients who underwent abdominal re-exploration after SCP over 7 years at a single institution. Demographic data, previous prolapse surgery, presenting complaint, prolapse stage, operative notes, and outcomes were reviewed. Nineteen patients were identified by CPT codes; ten met inclusion criteria | ||
| 520 | |a RESULTS: Seven of the ten patients presented with vaginal bulge, urinary frequency and urgency; four also had stress urinary incontinence. Two patients presented with vaginal bleeding and another with vaginal pain. Operative findings on reoperation for patients who had vaginal bulge included detachment from the vagina or cervix (n = 4, 57%) and the anterior longitudinal ligament (n = 3, 43%). Of these, two had their SCP mesh reattached, and five had SCP mesh removal and replacement. The patients with vaginal bleeding and pain underwent mesh excisions. All ten patients had uncomplicated postoperative courses with resolution of symptoms in most cases | ||
| 520 | |a CONCLUSIONS: Prolapse recurrence and complications after SCP have a significant impact on patient quality of life. Recurrent prolapse after SCP theoretically occurs because of mesh detachment from the cervix/vagina, the anterior longitudinal ligament, or disruption/stretching of the mesh. Our case series demonstrates that abdominal re-exploration is feasible and valuable in these rare cases | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Journal Article | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Complications | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Mesh | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Prolapse | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Reoperation | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Robotics | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Sacrocolpopexy | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Torres, Jose |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a O'Shaughnessy, Danielle L |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Finamore, Peter S |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t International urogynecology journal |d 2010 |g 33(2022), 11 vom: 17. Nov., Seite 3231-3236 |w (DE-627)NLM189166754 |x 1433-3023 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:33 |g year:2022 |g number:11 |g day:17 |g month:11 |g pages:3231-3236 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00192-022-05134-4 |3 Volltext |
| 912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_NLM | ||
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| 952 | |d 33 |j 2022 |e 11 |b 17 |c 11 |h 3231-3236 | ||