Cefepime-induced Neurotoxicity : A Retrospective Cohort Study in a South-Indian Tertiary Healthcare Facility
Copyright© Bentham Science Publishers; For any queries, please email at epubbenthamscience.net..
BACKGROUND: Cefepime is a fourth-generation cephalosporin with a broad spectrum coverage and anti-pseudomonal activity. The safety profile of cefepime was relatively favourable until neurotoxicity was first reported in 1999. Despite cefepime-induced neurotoxicity (CIN), it continues to be a principal part of parenteral treatment for various infections.
OBJECTIVE: The study aimed to determine the incidence and risk factors for CIN compared to other antibiotics.
METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was conducted involving 738 patients over eight months in Kasturba Medical College and Hospital, Manipal, India. Patients with cefepime were selected as study cohort (SC; n= 496), and other antibiotics were included in the reference cohort (RC; n=242).
RESULTS: The results showed that 53 (10.7%) patients developed neurotoxicity in the SC, whereas 12 (5%) patients in the RC. A significant association was found between neurotoxicity and cefepime use (X2 =6.641; p=0.01). SC has a 2.29 times increased risk of neurotoxicity than RC (OR: 2.29; 95% CI: 1.2-4.38). Risk estimation showed that renal failure patients had a 5.5 times higher risk for CIN than non-renal failure patients (OR: 5.5; 95% CI: 2.98 - 10.17). CIN symptoms were disorientation (38.5%), loss of consciousness (23.1%), drowsiness (18.5%), etc. The calculated number needed to harm (NNH) for cefepime was 17.2.
CONCLUSION: The study found a higher incidence of CIN compared to other antibiotics-induced neurotoxicity and a harmful association between cefepime use and CIN development. Besides, renal failure is a risk factor for CIN. Therefore, the study warrants the use of cefepime, where no other alternatives are available.
Medienart: |
E-Artikel |
---|
Erscheinungsjahr: |
2023 |
---|---|
Erschienen: |
2023 |
Enthalten in: |
Zur Gesamtaufnahme - volume:18 |
---|---|
Enthalten in: |
Current drug safety - 18(2023), 1 vom: 19., Seite 69-78 |
Sprache: |
Englisch |
---|
Beteiligte Personen: |
Alijani, Erfan [VerfasserIn] |
---|
Links: |
---|
Themen: |
807PW4VQE3 |
---|
Anmerkungen: |
Date Completed 08.02.2023 Date Revised 08.02.2023 published: Print Citation Status MEDLINE |
---|
doi: |
10.2174/1574886317666220309090408 |
---|
funding: |
|
---|---|
Förderinstitution / Projekttitel: |
|
PPN (Katalog-ID): |
NLM337949700 |
---|
LEADER | 01000naa a22002652 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | NLM337949700 | ||
003 | DE-627 | ||
005 | 20231225235557.0 | ||
007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
008 | 231225s2023 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
024 | 7 | |a 10.2174/1574886317666220309090408 |2 doi | |
028 | 5 | 2 | |a pubmed24n1126.xml |
035 | |a (DE-627)NLM337949700 | ||
035 | |a (NLM)35264094 | ||
040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
041 | |a eng | ||
100 | 1 | |a Alijani, Erfan |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 0 | |a Cefepime-induced Neurotoxicity |b A Retrospective Cohort Study in a South-Indian Tertiary Healthcare Facility |
264 | 1 | |c 2023 | |
336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |a ƒaComputermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |a ƒa Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
500 | |a Date Completed 08.02.2023 | ||
500 | |a Date Revised 08.02.2023 | ||
500 | |a published: Print | ||
500 | |a Citation Status MEDLINE | ||
520 | |a Copyright© Bentham Science Publishers; For any queries, please email at epubbenthamscience.net. | ||
520 | |a BACKGROUND: Cefepime is a fourth-generation cephalosporin with a broad spectrum coverage and anti-pseudomonal activity. The safety profile of cefepime was relatively favourable until neurotoxicity was first reported in 1999. Despite cefepime-induced neurotoxicity (CIN), it continues to be a principal part of parenteral treatment for various infections | ||
520 | |a OBJECTIVE: The study aimed to determine the incidence and risk factors for CIN compared to other antibiotics | ||
520 | |a METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was conducted involving 738 patients over eight months in Kasturba Medical College and Hospital, Manipal, India. Patients with cefepime were selected as study cohort (SC; n= 496), and other antibiotics were included in the reference cohort (RC; n=242) | ||
520 | |a RESULTS: The results showed that 53 (10.7%) patients developed neurotoxicity in the SC, whereas 12 (5%) patients in the RC. A significant association was found between neurotoxicity and cefepime use (X2 =6.641; p=0.01). SC has a 2.29 times increased risk of neurotoxicity than RC (OR: 2.29; 95% CI: 1.2-4.38). Risk estimation showed that renal failure patients had a 5.5 times higher risk for CIN than non-renal failure patients (OR: 5.5; 95% CI: 2.98 - 10.17). CIN symptoms were disorientation (38.5%), loss of consciousness (23.1%), drowsiness (18.5%), etc. The calculated number needed to harm (NNH) for cefepime was 17.2 | ||
520 | |a CONCLUSION: The study found a higher incidence of CIN compared to other antibiotics-induced neurotoxicity and a harmful association between cefepime use and CIN development. Besides, renal failure is a risk factor for CIN. Therefore, the study warrants the use of cefepime, where no other alternatives are available | ||
650 | 4 | |a Journal Article | |
650 | 4 | |a Adverse effects | |
650 | 4 | |a antibiotics | |
650 | 4 | |a cefepime | |
650 | 4 | |a drug safety | |
650 | 4 | |a neurotoxic effects | |
650 | 4 | |a neurotoxicity | |
650 | 7 | |a Cefepime |2 NLM | |
650 | 7 | |a 807PW4VQE3 |2 NLM | |
650 | 7 | |a Cephalosporins |2 NLM | |
650 | 7 | |a Anti-Bacterial Agents |2 NLM | |
700 | 1 | |a Miraj, Sonal Sekhar |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Kurian, Shilia Jacob |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Rao, Mahadev |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Saravu, Kavitha |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Current drug safety |d 2006 |g 18(2023), 1 vom: 19., Seite 69-78 |w (DE-627)NLM181475790 |x 2212-3911 |7 nnns |
773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:18 |g year:2023 |g number:1 |g day:19 |g pages:69-78 |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u http://dx.doi.org/10.2174/1574886317666220309090408 |3 Volltext |
912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
912 | |a GBV_NLM | ||
951 | |a AR | ||
952 | |d 18 |j 2023 |e 1 |b 19 |h 69-78 |