The quality of life of patients after orthodontic treatment depending on the use of different types of retention appliances
AIM: To assess the impact of the type of retention device on the quality of life of orthodontic patients.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: 311 patients were divided into four groups according to age. At the end of active orthodontic treatment, retainers were installed. After 6 months, a questionnaire was conducted using the standard OHIP-14 questionnaire in order to identify the attitude to the equipment used, the presence or absence of relapses and satisfaction with the state of the dental system.
RESULTS: The number of relapses in all groups is approximately at the same level, which indicates almost equal opportunities for retainers to retain the achieved result. There is no correlation between the convenience of using a particular type of retainer and the willingness to do so.
CONCLUSION: The motivation of patients to use removable or non-removable retention devices to a certain extent depends not only on the type of retainer, but also on the age at which the treatment was performed.
Medienart: |
E-Artikel |
---|
Erscheinungsjahr: |
2022 |
---|---|
Erschienen: |
2022 |
Enthalten in: |
Zur Gesamtaufnahme - volume:101 |
---|---|
Enthalten in: |
Stomatologiia - 101(2022), 1 vom: 01., Seite 40-45 |
Sprache: |
Russisch |
---|
Weiterer Titel: |
Kachestvo zhizni patsientov posle ortodonticheskogo lecheniya v zavisimosti ot ispol'zovaniya razlichnykh vidov retentsionnykh apparatov |
---|
Beteiligte Personen: |
Kuznetsova, M Yu [VerfasserIn] |
---|
Links: |
---|
Themen: |
Journal Article |
---|
Anmerkungen: |
Date Completed 22.02.2022 Date Revised 22.02.2022 published: Print Citation Status MEDLINE |
---|
doi: |
10.17116/stomat202210101140 |
---|
funding: |
|
---|---|
Förderinstitution / Projekttitel: |
|
PPN (Katalog-ID): |
NLM337163685 |
---|
LEADER | 01000naa a22002652 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | NLM337163685 | ||
003 | DE-627 | ||
005 | 20231225233803.0 | ||
007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
008 | 231225s2022 xx |||||o 00| ||rus c | ||
024 | 7 | |a 10.17116/stomat202210101140 |2 doi | |
028 | 5 | 2 | |a pubmed24n1123.xml |
035 | |a (DE-627)NLM337163685 | ||
035 | |a (NLM)35184532 | ||
040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
041 | |a rus | ||
100 | 1 | |a Kuznetsova, M Yu |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 4 | |a The quality of life of patients after orthodontic treatment depending on the use of different types of retention appliances |
246 | 3 | 3 | |a Kachestvo zhizni patsientov posle ortodonticheskogo lecheniya v zavisimosti ot ispol'zovaniya razlichnykh vidov retentsionnykh apparatov |
264 | 1 | |c 2022 | |
336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |a ƒaComputermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |a ƒa Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
500 | |a Date Completed 22.02.2022 | ||
500 | |a Date Revised 22.02.2022 | ||
500 | |a published: Print | ||
500 | |a Citation Status MEDLINE | ||
520 | |a AIM: To assess the impact of the type of retention device on the quality of life of orthodontic patients | ||
520 | |a MATERIAL AND METHODS: 311 patients were divided into four groups according to age. At the end of active orthodontic treatment, retainers were installed. After 6 months, a questionnaire was conducted using the standard OHIP-14 questionnaire in order to identify the attitude to the equipment used, the presence or absence of relapses and satisfaction with the state of the dental system | ||
520 | |a RESULTS: The number of relapses in all groups is approximately at the same level, which indicates almost equal opportunities for retainers to retain the achieved result. There is no correlation between the convenience of using a particular type of retainer and the willingness to do so | ||
520 | |a CONCLUSION: The motivation of patients to use removable or non-removable retention devices to a certain extent depends not only on the type of retainer, but also on the age at which the treatment was performed | ||
650 | 4 | |a Journal Article | |
650 | 4 | |a orthodontic retention | |
650 | 4 | |a orthodontics | |
650 | 4 | |a relapse | |
650 | 4 | |a treatment outcome | |
700 | 1 | |a Sevbitov, A V |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Tikhonov, V E |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Platonova, V V |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Zangieva, O T |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Enina, Yu I |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Stomatologiia |d 1945 |g 101(2022), 1 vom: 01., Seite 40-45 |w (DE-627)NLM000023809 |x 0039-1735 |7 nnns |
773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:101 |g year:2022 |g number:1 |g day:01 |g pages:40-45 |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u http://dx.doi.org/10.17116/stomat202210101140 |3 Volltext |
912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
912 | |a GBV_NLM | ||
951 | |a AR | ||
952 | |d 101 |j 2022 |e 1 |b 01 |h 40-45 |