Clinical Subtypes of Sepsis Survivors Predict Readmission and Mortality after Hospital Discharge
Rationale: Sepsis survivors experience adverse outcomes including high rates of postdischarge mortality and rehospitalization. Given the heterogeneity of the condition, using a person-centered framework to identify subtypes within this population with different risks of postdischarge outcomes may optimize postsepsis care. Objectives: To classify individuals into subtypes and assess the association of subtypes with 30-day rehospitalization and mortality. Methods: We conducted a retrospective observational study between January 2014 and October 2017 among 20,745 patients admitted to one of 12 southeastern U.S. hospitals with a clinical definition of sepsis. We used latent class analysis to classify sepsis survivors into subtypes, which were evaluated against 30-day readmission and mortality rates using a specialized regression approach. A secondary analysis evaluated subtypes against readmission rate for ambulatory care-sensitive conditions. Results: Among 20,745 patients, latent class analysis identified five distinct subtypes as the optimal solution. Clinical subtype was associated with 30-day readmission, with the subtype existing poor health with severe illness and complex needs after discharge demonstrating highest risk (35%) and the subtype low risk, barriers to care demonstrating the lowest risk (9%). Forty-seven percent of readmissions in the subtype poor functional status were for ambulatory care-sensitive conditions, whereas 17% of readmissions in the subtype previously healthy with severe illness and complex needs after discharge, barriers to care were for ambulatory care-sensitive conditions. Subtype was significantly associated with 30-day mortality: highest in for existing poor health with severe illness and complex needs after discharge (8%) and lowest for low risk, barriers to care (0.1%). Conclusions: Sepsis survivors can be classified into subtypes representing nuanced constellations of characteristics, with differential 30-day mortality and readmission risk profiles. Predischarge classification may allow an individualized approach to postsepsis care.
Errataetall: |
CommentIn: Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2022 Aug;19(8):1271-1272. - PMID 35913466 |
---|---|
Medienart: |
E-Artikel |
Erscheinungsjahr: |
2022 |
---|---|
Erschienen: |
2022 |
Enthalten in: |
Zur Gesamtaufnahme - volume:19 |
---|---|
Enthalten in: |
Annals of the American Thoracic Society - 19(2022), 8 vom: 31. Aug., Seite 1355-1363 |
Sprache: |
Englisch |
---|
Beteiligte Personen: |
Taylor, Stephanie Parks [VerfasserIn] |
---|
Links: |
---|
Themen: |
Hospital readmission |
---|
Anmerkungen: |
Date Completed 03.08.2022 Date Revised 02.08.2023 published: Print CommentIn: Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2022 Aug;19(8):1271-1272. - PMID 35913466 Citation Status MEDLINE |
---|
doi: |
10.1513/AnnalsATS.202109-1088OC |
---|
funding: |
|
---|---|
Förderinstitution / Projekttitel: |
|
PPN (Katalog-ID): |
NLM337122369 |
---|
LEADER | 01000naa a22002652 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | NLM337122369 | ||
003 | DE-627 | ||
005 | 20231225233706.0 | ||
007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
008 | 231225s2022 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
024 | 7 | |a 10.1513/AnnalsATS.202109-1088OC |2 doi | |
028 | 5 | 2 | |a pubmed24n1123.xml |
035 | |a (DE-627)NLM337122369 | ||
035 | |a (NLM)35180373 | ||
040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
041 | |a eng | ||
100 | 1 | |a Taylor, Stephanie Parks |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 0 | |a Clinical Subtypes of Sepsis Survivors Predict Readmission and Mortality after Hospital Discharge |
264 | 1 | |c 2022 | |
336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |a ƒaComputermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |a ƒa Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
500 | |a Date Completed 03.08.2022 | ||
500 | |a Date Revised 02.08.2023 | ||
500 | |a published: Print | ||
500 | |a CommentIn: Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2022 Aug;19(8):1271-1272. - PMID 35913466 | ||
500 | |a Citation Status MEDLINE | ||
520 | |a Rationale: Sepsis survivors experience adverse outcomes including high rates of postdischarge mortality and rehospitalization. Given the heterogeneity of the condition, using a person-centered framework to identify subtypes within this population with different risks of postdischarge outcomes may optimize postsepsis care. Objectives: To classify individuals into subtypes and assess the association of subtypes with 30-day rehospitalization and mortality. Methods: We conducted a retrospective observational study between January 2014 and October 2017 among 20,745 patients admitted to one of 12 southeastern U.S. hospitals with a clinical definition of sepsis. We used latent class analysis to classify sepsis survivors into subtypes, which were evaluated against 30-day readmission and mortality rates using a specialized regression approach. A secondary analysis evaluated subtypes against readmission rate for ambulatory care-sensitive conditions. Results: Among 20,745 patients, latent class analysis identified five distinct subtypes as the optimal solution. Clinical subtype was associated with 30-day readmission, with the subtype existing poor health with severe illness and complex needs after discharge demonstrating highest risk (35%) and the subtype low risk, barriers to care demonstrating the lowest risk (9%). Forty-seven percent of readmissions in the subtype poor functional status were for ambulatory care-sensitive conditions, whereas 17% of readmissions in the subtype previously healthy with severe illness and complex needs after discharge, barriers to care were for ambulatory care-sensitive conditions. Subtype was significantly associated with 30-day mortality: highest in for existing poor health with severe illness and complex needs after discharge (8%) and lowest for low risk, barriers to care (0.1%). Conclusions: Sepsis survivors can be classified into subtypes representing nuanced constellations of characteristics, with differential 30-day mortality and readmission risk profiles. Predischarge classification may allow an individualized approach to postsepsis care | ||
650 | 4 | |a Journal Article | |
650 | 4 | |a Observational Study | |
650 | 4 | |a Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural | |
650 | 4 | |a hospital readmission | |
650 | 4 | |a mortality | |
650 | 4 | |a phenotype | |
650 | 4 | |a sepsis | |
650 | 4 | |a survivor | |
700 | 1 | |a Bray, Bethany C |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Chou, Shih-Hsiung |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Burns, Ryan |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Kowalkowski, Marc A |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Annals of the American Thoracic Society |d 2013 |g 19(2022), 8 vom: 31. Aug., Seite 1355-1363 |w (DE-627)NLM225943336 |x 2325-6621 |7 nnns |
773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:19 |g year:2022 |g number:8 |g day:31 |g month:08 |g pages:1355-1363 |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u http://dx.doi.org/10.1513/AnnalsATS.202109-1088OC |3 Volltext |
912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
912 | |a GBV_NLM | ||
951 | |a AR | ||
952 | |d 19 |j 2022 |e 8 |b 31 |c 08 |h 1355-1363 |