Global prevalence of resilience in health care professionals : A systematic review, meta-analysis and meta-regression
© 2022 John Wiley & Sons Ltd..
AIMS: This review aims to examine the prevalence estimate of low resilience among health care professionals and identify the factors affecting the prevalence.
BACKGROUND: Health care professionals experience high levels of stress. Understanding the health care professionals' resilience may provide an insight into how they perform in a highly stressed environment.
EVALUATION: A comprehensive search of 11 databases was conducted. Studies that provided prevalence rates for low resilience among health care professionals working in a health care setting were included. Meta-analyses, sensitivity, subgroup analyses and meta-regression were conducted.
KEY ISSUES: Among 27,720 studies, 41 studies (N = 17,073) across 16 countries were included. The prevalence of low resilience was 26% (95% CI: 20-32). Subgroup analyses indicated that types of resilience measures affect resilience prevalence significantly. A higher prevalence of low resilience was observed among allied health professions during the COVID-19 pandemic in the Middle East.
CONCLUSIONS: This review indicated the prevalence of low resilience and type of resilience measurement instruments that affected the prevalence.
IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING MANAGEMENT: This review provides a roadmap to design tailored, discipline-specific and sustainable resilience training for nurses. Nursing managers should monitor the working hours and workload of nursing staffing in order to provide a protective working environment. This is a systematic review, and the PROSPERO registration number is CRD42021235350.
| Medienart: |
E-Artikel |
|---|
| Erscheinungsjahr: |
2022 |
|---|---|
| Erschienen: |
2022 |
| Enthalten in: |
Zur Gesamtaufnahme - volume:30 |
|---|---|
| Enthalten in: |
Journal of nursing management - 30(2022), 3 vom: 07. Apr., Seite 795-816 |
| Sprache: |
Englisch |
|---|
| Beteiligte Personen: |
Cheng, Crystal Kai Tian [VerfasserIn] |
|---|
| Links: |
|---|
| Themen: |
Health personnel |
|---|
| Anmerkungen: |
Date Completed 11.04.2022 Date Revised 11.04.2022 published: Print-Electronic Citation Status MEDLINE |
|---|
| doi: |
10.1111/jonm.13558 |
|---|
| funding: |
|
|---|---|
| Förderinstitution / Projekttitel: |
|
| PPN (Katalog-ID): |
NLM336630409 |
|---|
| LEADER | 01000naa a22002652 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | NLM336630409 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20231225232600.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 231225s2022 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1111/jonm.13558 |2 doi | |
| 028 | 5 | 2 | |a pubmed24n1122.xml |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)NLM336630409 | ||
| 035 | |a (NLM)35130583 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Cheng, Crystal Kai Tian |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Global prevalence of resilience in health care professionals |b A systematic review, meta-analysis and meta-regression |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2022 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a ƒaComputermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a ƒa Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 500 | |a Date Completed 11.04.2022 | ||
| 500 | |a Date Revised 11.04.2022 | ||
| 500 | |a published: Print-Electronic | ||
| 500 | |a Citation Status MEDLINE | ||
| 520 | |a © 2022 John Wiley & Sons Ltd. | ||
| 520 | |a AIMS: This review aims to examine the prevalence estimate of low resilience among health care professionals and identify the factors affecting the prevalence | ||
| 520 | |a BACKGROUND: Health care professionals experience high levels of stress. Understanding the health care professionals' resilience may provide an insight into how they perform in a highly stressed environment | ||
| 520 | |a EVALUATION: A comprehensive search of 11 databases was conducted. Studies that provided prevalence rates for low resilience among health care professionals working in a health care setting were included. Meta-analyses, sensitivity, subgroup analyses and meta-regression were conducted | ||
| 520 | |a KEY ISSUES: Among 27,720 studies, 41 studies (N = 17,073) across 16 countries were included. The prevalence of low resilience was 26% (95% CI: 20-32). Subgroup analyses indicated that types of resilience measures affect resilience prevalence significantly. A higher prevalence of low resilience was observed among allied health professions during the COVID-19 pandemic in the Middle East | ||
| 520 | |a CONCLUSIONS: This review indicated the prevalence of low resilience and type of resilience measurement instruments that affected the prevalence | ||
| 520 | |a IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING MANAGEMENT: This review provides a roadmap to design tailored, discipline-specific and sustainable resilience training for nurses. Nursing managers should monitor the working hours and workload of nursing staffing in order to provide a protective working environment. This is a systematic review, and the PROSPERO registration number is CRD42021235350 | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Journal Article | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Meta-Analysis | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Review | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Systematic Review | |
| 650 | 4 | |a health personnel | |
| 650 | 4 | |a meta-analysis | |
| 650 | 4 | |a prevalence | |
| 650 | 4 | |a resilience, psychological | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Chua, Jie Hui |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Cheng, Ling Jie |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Ang, Wei How Darryl |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Lau, Ying |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Journal of nursing management |d 1993 |g 30(2022), 3 vom: 07. Apr., Seite 795-816 |w (DE-627)NLM075276216 |x 1365-2834 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:30 |g year:2022 |g number:3 |g day:07 |g month:04 |g pages:795-816 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jonm.13558 |3 Volltext |
| 912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_NLM | ||
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| 952 | |d 30 |j 2022 |e 3 |b 07 |c 04 |h 795-816 | ||