Diagnostic performance of the fully automated Roche Elecsys SARS-CoV-2 antigen electrochemiluminescence immunoassay : a pooled analysis
© 2022 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston..
OBJECTIVES: Among the diagnostic tests that have recently become commercially available for diagnosing coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), the fully-automated Roche Elecsys severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) antigen electrochemiluminescence immunoassay (ECLIA) is one of the most widespread for its adaptability within a system of laboratory automation, rapidity and high-throughput. This article is aimed to provide the results of the first pooled analysis of its accuracy for diagnosing SARS-CoV-2 infections.
CONTENT: We carried out an electronic search in Scopus and Medline, without language or date restrictions (i.e., up to January 18, 2022), to identify articles where the diagnostic performance of Roche Elecsys SARS-CoV-2 antigen ECLIA was compared with that of reference molecular diagnostic techniques.
SUMMARY: Overall, 11 studies were identified, 10 of which (n=6,095 swabs) provided necessary data for inclusion in a pooled analysis. The pooled diagnostic sensitivity, specificity and area under the curve (AUC) in nasopharyngeal samples were 0.68 (95%CI, 0.66-0.70), 0.99 (95%CI, 0.99-0.99) and 0.958 (95%CI, 0.936-0.980), respectively. The cumulative observed agreement with reference molecular assays was 89.5% and the kappa statistic was 0.735 (95%CI, 0.716-0.754). The pooled diagnostic sensitivity in samples with high viral load (i.e., cycle threshold values <28-30) was 0.95 (95%CI, 0.92-0.97).
OUTLOOK: The results of this pooled analysis confirm that the fully-automated Roche Elecsys SARS-CoV-2 antigen ECLIA has high diagnostic specificity and optimal diagnostic sensitivity for identifying nasopharyngeal samples with higher viral load, thus making it a reliable technique for mass screening and for supporting strategies based on shorten isolation and/or quarantine.
Medienart: |
E-Artikel |
---|
Erscheinungsjahr: |
2022 |
---|---|
Erschienen: |
2022 |
Enthalten in: |
Zur Gesamtaufnahme - volume:60 |
---|---|
Enthalten in: |
Clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine - 60(2022), 5 vom: 26. Apr., Seite 655-661 |
Sprache: |
Englisch |
---|
Beteiligte Personen: |
Lippi, Giuseppe [VerfasserIn] |
---|
Links: |
---|
Themen: |
Antibodies, Viral |
---|
Anmerkungen: |
Date Completed 05.04.2022 Date Revised 03.01.2024 published: Electronic-Print Citation Status MEDLINE |
---|
doi: |
10.1515/cclm-2022-0053 |
---|
funding: |
|
---|---|
Förderinstitution / Projekttitel: |
|
PPN (Katalog-ID): |
NLM336474113 |
---|
LEADER | 01000caa a22002652 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | NLM336474113 | ||
003 | DE-627 | ||
005 | 20240108141137.0 | ||
007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
008 | 231225s2022 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
024 | 7 | |a 10.1515/cclm-2022-0053 |2 doi | |
028 | 5 | 2 | |a pubmed24n1247.xml |
035 | |a (DE-627)NLM336474113 | ||
035 | |a (NLM)35114742 | ||
040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
041 | |a eng | ||
100 | 1 | |a Lippi, Giuseppe |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 0 | |a Diagnostic performance of the fully automated Roche Elecsys SARS-CoV-2 antigen electrochemiluminescence immunoassay |b a pooled analysis |
264 | 1 | |c 2022 | |
336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |a ƒaComputermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |a ƒa Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
500 | |a Date Completed 05.04.2022 | ||
500 | |a Date Revised 03.01.2024 | ||
500 | |a published: Electronic-Print | ||
500 | |a Citation Status MEDLINE | ||
520 | |a © 2022 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston. | ||
520 | |a OBJECTIVES: Among the diagnostic tests that have recently become commercially available for diagnosing coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), the fully-automated Roche Elecsys severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) antigen electrochemiluminescence immunoassay (ECLIA) is one of the most widespread for its adaptability within a system of laboratory automation, rapidity and high-throughput. This article is aimed to provide the results of the first pooled analysis of its accuracy for diagnosing SARS-CoV-2 infections | ||
520 | |a CONTENT: We carried out an electronic search in Scopus and Medline, without language or date restrictions (i.e., up to January 18, 2022), to identify articles where the diagnostic performance of Roche Elecsys SARS-CoV-2 antigen ECLIA was compared with that of reference molecular diagnostic techniques | ||
520 | |a SUMMARY: Overall, 11 studies were identified, 10 of which (n=6,095 swabs) provided necessary data for inclusion in a pooled analysis. The pooled diagnostic sensitivity, specificity and area under the curve (AUC) in nasopharyngeal samples were 0.68 (95%CI, 0.66-0.70), 0.99 (95%CI, 0.99-0.99) and 0.958 (95%CI, 0.936-0.980), respectively. The cumulative observed agreement with reference molecular assays was 89.5% and the kappa statistic was 0.735 (95%CI, 0.716-0.754). The pooled diagnostic sensitivity in samples with high viral load (i.e., cycle threshold values <28-30) was 0.95 (95%CI, 0.92-0.97) | ||
520 | |a OUTLOOK: The results of this pooled analysis confirm that the fully-automated Roche Elecsys SARS-CoV-2 antigen ECLIA has high diagnostic specificity and optimal diagnostic sensitivity for identifying nasopharyngeal samples with higher viral load, thus making it a reliable technique for mass screening and for supporting strategies based on shorten isolation and/or quarantine | ||
650 | 4 | |a Journal Article | |
650 | 4 | |a Meta-Analysis | |
650 | 4 | |a COVID-19 | |
650 | 4 | |a SARS-CoV-2 | |
650 | 4 | |a antigen | |
650 | 4 | |a diagnosis | |
650 | 4 | |a immunoassay | |
650 | 7 | |a Antibodies, Viral |2 NLM | |
700 | 1 | |a Henry, Brandon M |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Adeli, Khosrow |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine |d 1998 |g 60(2022), 5 vom: 26. Apr., Seite 655-661 |w (DE-627)NLM095304118 |x 1437-4331 |7 nnns |
773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:60 |g year:2022 |g number:5 |g day:26 |g month:04 |g pages:655-661 |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/cclm-2022-0053 |3 Volltext |
912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
912 | |a GBV_NLM | ||
951 | |a AR | ||
952 | |d 60 |j 2022 |e 5 |b 26 |c 04 |h 655-661 |