Potential impact of encounter patient decision aids on the patient-clinician dialogue : a qualitative study on Dutch and American medical specialists' experiences

© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ..

OBJECTIVES: To examine the experiences among Dutch and American clinicians on the impact of using encounter patient decision aids (ePDAs) on their clinical practice, and subsequently to formulate recommendations for sustained ePDA use in clinical practice.

DESIGN: Qualitative study using semi-structured interviews with clinicians who used 11 different ePDAs (applicable to their specialty) for 3 months after a short training. The verbatim transcribed interviews were coded with thematic analysis by six researchers via ATLAS.ti.

SETTING: Nine hospitals in the Netherlands and two hospitals in the USA.

PARTICIPANTS: Twenty-five clinicians were interviewed: 16 Dutch medical specialists from four different disciplines (gynaecologists, ear-nose-throat specialists, neurologists and orthopaedic surgeon), 5 American gynaecologists and 4 American gynaecology medical trainees.

RESULTS: The interviews showed that the ePDA potentially impacted the patient-clinician dialogue in several ways. We identified six themes that illustrate this: that is, (1) communication style, for example, structuring the conversation; (2) the patient's role, for example, encouraging patients to ask more questions; (3) the clinician's role, for example, prompting clinicians to discuss more information; (4) workflow, for example, familiarity with the ePDA's content helped to integrate it into practice; (5) shared decision-making (SDM), for example, mixed experiences whether the ePDA contributed to SDM; and (6) content of the ePDA. Recommendations to possibly improve ePDA use based on the clinician's experiences: (1) add pictorial health information to the ePDA instead of text only and (2) instruct clinicians how to use the ePDA in a flexible (depending on their discipline and setting) and personalised way adapting the ePDA to the patients' needs (e.g., mark off irrelevant options).

CONCLUSIONS: ePDAs contributed to the patient-clinician dialogue in several ways according to medical specialists. A flexible and personalised approach appeared appropriate to integrate the use of ePDAs into the clinician's workflow, and customise their use to individual patients' needs.

Medienart:

E-Artikel

Erscheinungsjahr:

2022

Erschienen:

2022

Enthalten in:

Zur Gesamtaufnahme - volume:12

Enthalten in:

BMJ open - 12(2022), 2 vom: 01. Feb., Seite e048146

Sprache:

Englisch

Beteiligte Personen:

Rake, Ester A [VerfasserIn]
Dreesens, Dunja [VerfasserIn]
Venhorst, Kristie [VerfasserIn]
Meinders, Marjan J [VerfasserIn]
Geltink, Tessa [VerfasserIn]
Wolswinkel, Jenny T [VerfasserIn]
Dannenberg, Michelle [VerfasserIn]
Kremer, Jan A M [VerfasserIn]
Elwyn, Glyn [VerfasserIn]
Aarts, Johanna W M [VerfasserIn]

Links:

Volltext

Themen:

Gynaecology
Journal Article
Medical education & training
Neurology
Orthopaedic & trauma surgery
Otolaryngology
Qualitative research

Anmerkungen:

Date Completed 22.03.2022

Date Revised 22.03.2022

published: Electronic

Citation Status MEDLINE

doi:

10.1136/bmjopen-2020-048146

funding:

Förderinstitution / Projekttitel:

PPN (Katalog-ID):

NLM336392206