Deep learning identified glioblastoma subtypes based on internal genomic expression ranks
© 2022. The Author(s)..
BACKGROUND: Glioblastoma (GBM) can be divided into subtypes according to their genomic features, including Proneural (PN), Neural (NE), Classical (CL) and Mesenchymal (ME). However, it is a difficult task to unify various genomic expression profiles which were standardized with various procedures from different studies and to manually classify a given GBM sample into a subtype.
METHODS: An algorithm was developed to unify the genomic profiles of GBM samples into a standardized normal distribution (SND), based on their internal expression ranks. Deep neural networks (DNN) and convolutional DNN (CDNN) models were trained on original and SND data. In addition, expanded SND data by combining various The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) datasets were used to improve the robustness and generalization capacity of the CDNN models.
RESULTS: The SND data kept unimodal distribution similar to their original data, and also kept the internal expression ranks of all genes for each sample. CDNN models trained on the SND data showed significantly higher accuracy compared to DNN and CDNN models trained on primary expression data. Interestingly, the CDNN models classified the NE subtype with the lowest accuracy in the GBM datasets, expanded datasets and in IDH wide type GBMs, consistent with the recent studies that NE subtype should be excluded. Furthermore, the CDNN models also recognized independent GBM datasets, even with small set of genomic expressions.
CONCLUSIONS: The GBM expression profiles can be transformed into unified SND data, which can be used to train CDNN models with high accuracy and generalization capacity. These models suggested NE subtype may be not compatible with the 4 subtypes classification system.
| Medienart: |
E-Artikel |
|---|
| Erscheinungsjahr: |
2022 |
|---|---|
| Erschienen: |
2022 |
| Enthalten in: |
Zur Gesamtaufnahme - volume:22 |
|---|---|
| Enthalten in: |
BMC cancer - 22(2022), 1 vom: 20. Jan., Seite 86 |
| Sprache: |
Englisch |
|---|
| Beteiligte Personen: |
Mao, Xing-Gang [VerfasserIn] |
|---|
| Links: |
|---|
| Themen: |
Artificial intelligence |
|---|
| Anmerkungen: |
Date Completed 03.03.2022 Date Revised 03.03.2022 published: Electronic Citation Status MEDLINE |
|---|
| doi: |
10.1186/s12885-022-09191-2 |
|---|
| funding: |
|
|---|---|
| Förderinstitution / Projekttitel: |
|
| PPN (Katalog-ID): |
NLM335924034 |
|---|
| LEADER | 01000naa a22002652 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | NLM335924034 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20231225230948.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 231225s2022 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1186/s12885-022-09191-2 |2 doi | |
| 028 | 5 | 2 | |a pubmed24n1119.xml |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)NLM335924034 | ||
| 035 | |a (NLM)35057766 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Mao, Xing-Gang |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Deep learning identified glioblastoma subtypes based on internal genomic expression ranks |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2022 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a ƒaComputermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a ƒa Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 500 | |a Date Completed 03.03.2022 | ||
| 500 | |a Date Revised 03.03.2022 | ||
| 500 | |a published: Electronic | ||
| 500 | |a Citation Status MEDLINE | ||
| 520 | |a © 2022. The Author(s). | ||
| 520 | |a BACKGROUND: Glioblastoma (GBM) can be divided into subtypes according to their genomic features, including Proneural (PN), Neural (NE), Classical (CL) and Mesenchymal (ME). However, it is a difficult task to unify various genomic expression profiles which were standardized with various procedures from different studies and to manually classify a given GBM sample into a subtype | ||
| 520 | |a METHODS: An algorithm was developed to unify the genomic profiles of GBM samples into a standardized normal distribution (SND), based on their internal expression ranks. Deep neural networks (DNN) and convolutional DNN (CDNN) models were trained on original and SND data. In addition, expanded SND data by combining various The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) datasets were used to improve the robustness and generalization capacity of the CDNN models | ||
| 520 | |a RESULTS: The SND data kept unimodal distribution similar to their original data, and also kept the internal expression ranks of all genes for each sample. CDNN models trained on the SND data showed significantly higher accuracy compared to DNN and CDNN models trained on primary expression data. Interestingly, the CDNN models classified the NE subtype with the lowest accuracy in the GBM datasets, expanded datasets and in IDH wide type GBMs, consistent with the recent studies that NE subtype should be excluded. Furthermore, the CDNN models also recognized independent GBM datasets, even with small set of genomic expressions | ||
| 520 | |a CONCLUSIONS: The GBM expression profiles can be transformed into unified SND data, which can be used to train CDNN models with high accuracy and generalization capacity. These models suggested NE subtype may be not compatible with the 4 subtypes classification system | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Journal Article | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Artificial intelligence | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Classical | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Deep neural network | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Glioma | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Machine learning | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Mesenchymal | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Molecular subtype | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Neural | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Proneural | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Support vector machines | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Xue, Xiao-Yan |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Wang, Ling |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Lin, Wei |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Zhang, Xiang |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t BMC cancer |d 2001 |g 22(2022), 1 vom: 20. Jan., Seite 86 |w (DE-627)NLM111431948 |x 1471-2407 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:22 |g year:2022 |g number:1 |g day:20 |g month:01 |g pages:86 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-022-09191-2 |3 Volltext |
| 912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_NLM | ||
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| 952 | |d 22 |j 2022 |e 1 |b 20 |c 01 |h 86 | ||