Noninvasive Ventilation in the Management of Respiratory Failure Due to COVID-19 Infection : Experience From a Resource-Limited Setting

Copyright © 2021 Mayo Foundation for Medical Education and Research. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved..

OBJECTIVE: To study the role of noninvasive ventilation (NIV) in Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome-Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV2) related acute respiratory failure (C-ARF).

PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with C-ARF managed on NIV were categorized as NIV success or failure (death or intubation). Factors associated with failure were explored using regression analysis and expressed as odds ratio (OR) with 95% CI.

RESULTS: Between April 1, 2020, and September 15, 2020, a total of 286 patients with a mean ± SD age of 53.1±11.6 years and Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II score of 11.1±5.5 were initiated on NIV. Of the 182 patients (63.6%) successfully managed on NIV alone, 118 had moderate or severe acute respiratory distress syndrome. When compared with NIV success, NIV failure was associated with lower admission PaO2 to fraction of inspired oxygen ratio (P<.001) and higher respiratory rate (P<.001). On penalized logistic regression analysis, NIV failure was associated with higher Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II score (OR, 1.12; 95% CI, 1.01 to 1.24), severe acute respiratory distress syndrome (OR, 3.99; 95% CI, 1.24 to 12.9), D-dimer level of 1000 ng/mL DDU (to convert to mg/L, divide by 1000) or greater (OR, 2.60; 95% CI, 1.16 to 5.87), need for inotropes or dialysis (OR, 12.7; 95% CI, 4.3 to 37.7), and nosocomial infections (OR, 13.6; 95% CI, 4.06 to 45.9). Overall mortality was 30.1% (86/286). In patients requiring intubation, time to intubation was longer in nonsurvivors than survivors (median, 5; interquartile range, 3-8 vs 3; interquartile range, 2-3 days; P<.001).

CONCLUSION: Noninvasive ventilation can be used successfully in C-ARF. Illness severity and need for non-respiratory organ support predict NIV failure.

Errataetall:

CommentIn: Mayo Clin Proc. 2022 Jan;97(1):4-6. - PMID 34996564

Medienart:

E-Artikel

Erscheinungsjahr:

2022

Erschienen:

2022

Enthalten in:

Zur Gesamtaufnahme - volume:97

Enthalten in:

Mayo Clinic proceedings - 97(2022), 1 vom: 07. Jan., Seite 31-45

Sprache:

Englisch

Beteiligte Personen:

Chacko, Binila [VerfasserIn]
Thomas, Lovely [VerfasserIn]
Sharma, Roshni [VerfasserIn]
Yadav, Bijesh [VerfasserIn]
Jeyaseelan, Lakshmanan [VerfasserIn]
Arul, Ashwin O [VerfasserIn]
Victor, Punitha [VerfasserIn]
Chandiraseharan, Vignesh K [VerfasserIn]
Lenin, Audrin [VerfasserIn]
Carey, Ronald A B [VerfasserIn]
Jayakaran, Jonathan A J [VerfasserIn]
Krishnaswami, Rajiv K [VerfasserIn]
Peter, John Victor [VerfasserIn]

Links:

Volltext

Themen:

Journal Article

Anmerkungen:

Date Completed 20.01.2022

Date Revised 16.07.2022

published: Print-Electronic

CommentIn: Mayo Clin Proc. 2022 Jan;97(1):4-6. - PMID 34996564

Citation Status MEDLINE

doi:

10.1016/j.mayocp.2021.10.002

funding:

Förderinstitution / Projekttitel:

PPN (Katalog-ID):

NLM335318584