Correlation between Commercial Anti-RBD IgG Titer and Neutralization Titer against SARS-CoV-2 Beta Variant
OBJECTIVES: The emergence of SARS-CoV-2 variants of concern (VOCs) have diminished the effectiveness of vaccines and are associated with a rebound in the number of COVID-19 cases globally. These variants contain mutations at the spike (S) protein receptor binding site (RBD), which affect antibody binding. Current commercially available antibody assays were developed before the VOCs emerged. It is unclear whether the levels of these commercially available antibody assays can predict the neutralizing antibody titers against the VOCs. In this study, we sought to determine the correlation between the binding antibody concentration and microneutralization antibody titer against the beta variant.
METHODS: This study included 58 COVID-19 patients. The concentrations of IgG against the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein RBD and nucleocapsid (N) protein were measured using the Abbott SARS-CoV-2 IgG II Quant assay and the SARS-CoV-2 IgG assay, respectively. The neutralization antibody titer against the wild type lineage A SARS-CoV-2 and against the beta variant (B.1.351) was determined using a conventional live virus neutralization test.
RESULTS: The geometric mean MN titer (GMT) against the beta variant was significantly lower than that against the wild type lineage A virus (5.6 vs. 47.3, p < 0.0001). The anti-RBD IgG had a better correlation with the neutralizing antibody titer than that of the anti-N IgG assay against the wild type lineage A virus (Spearman rho, 0.5901 vs. 0.3827). However, the correlation between the anti-RBD or the anti-N IgG and the MN titer against the beta variant was poor.
CONCLUSIONS: Currently available commercial antibody assays may not predict the level of neutralizing antibodies against the variants. A new generation of antibody tests specific for variants are required.
| Medienart: |
E-Artikel |
|---|
| Erscheinungsjahr: |
2021 |
|---|---|
| Erschienen: |
2021 |
| Enthalten in: |
Zur Gesamtaufnahme - volume:11 |
|---|---|
| Enthalten in: |
Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) - 11(2021), 12 vom: 27. Nov. |
| Sprache: |
Englisch |
|---|
| Beteiligte Personen: |
Poon, Rosana Wing-Shan [VerfasserIn] |
|---|
| Links: |
|---|
| Themen: |
Antibody |
|---|
| Anmerkungen: |
Date Revised 29.12.2021 published: Electronic Citation Status PubMed-not-MEDLINE |
|---|
| doi: |
10.3390/diagnostics11122216 |
|---|
| funding: |
|
|---|---|
| Förderinstitution / Projekttitel: |
|
| PPN (Katalog-ID): |
NLM334793599 |
|---|
| LEADER | 01000naa a22002652 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | NLM334793599 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20231225224450.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 231225s2021 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.3390/diagnostics11122216 |2 doi | |
| 028 | 5 | 2 | |a pubmed24n1115.xml |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)NLM334793599 | ||
| 035 | |a (NLM)34943453 | ||
| 035 | |a (PII)2216 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Poon, Rosana Wing-Shan |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Correlation between Commercial Anti-RBD IgG Titer and Neutralization Titer against SARS-CoV-2 Beta Variant |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2021 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a ƒaComputermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a ƒa Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 500 | |a Date Revised 29.12.2021 | ||
| 500 | |a published: Electronic | ||
| 500 | |a Citation Status PubMed-not-MEDLINE | ||
| 520 | |a OBJECTIVES: The emergence of SARS-CoV-2 variants of concern (VOCs) have diminished the effectiveness of vaccines and are associated with a rebound in the number of COVID-19 cases globally. These variants contain mutations at the spike (S) protein receptor binding site (RBD), which affect antibody binding. Current commercially available antibody assays were developed before the VOCs emerged. It is unclear whether the levels of these commercially available antibody assays can predict the neutralizing antibody titers against the VOCs. In this study, we sought to determine the correlation between the binding antibody concentration and microneutralization antibody titer against the beta variant | ||
| 520 | |a METHODS: This study included 58 COVID-19 patients. The concentrations of IgG against the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein RBD and nucleocapsid (N) protein were measured using the Abbott SARS-CoV-2 IgG II Quant assay and the SARS-CoV-2 IgG assay, respectively. The neutralization antibody titer against the wild type lineage A SARS-CoV-2 and against the beta variant (B.1.351) was determined using a conventional live virus neutralization test | ||
| 520 | |a RESULTS: The geometric mean MN titer (GMT) against the beta variant was significantly lower than that against the wild type lineage A virus (5.6 vs. 47.3, p < 0.0001). The anti-RBD IgG had a better correlation with the neutralizing antibody titer than that of the anti-N IgG assay against the wild type lineage A virus (Spearman rho, 0.5901 vs. 0.3827). However, the correlation between the anti-RBD or the anti-N IgG and the MN titer against the beta variant was poor | ||
| 520 | |a CONCLUSIONS: Currently available commercial antibody assays may not predict the level of neutralizing antibodies against the variants. A new generation of antibody tests specific for variants are required | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Journal Article | |
| 650 | 4 | |a COVID-19 | |
| 650 | 4 | |a SARS-CoV-2 | |
| 650 | 4 | |a antibody | |
| 650 | 4 | |a neutralization | |
| 650 | 4 | |a receptor binding domain | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Lu, Lu |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Fong, Carol Ho-Yan |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Ip, Tak-Chuen |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Chen, Lin-Lei |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Zhang, Ricky Rui-Qi |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Yip, Cyril Chik-Yan |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Cheng, Vincent Chi-Chung |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Chan, Kwok-Hung |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Yuen, Kwok-Yung |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a To, Kelvin Kai-Wang |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) |d 2011 |g 11(2021), 12 vom: 27. Nov. |w (DE-627)NLM250111136 |x 2075-4418 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:11 |g year:2021 |g number:12 |g day:27 |g month:11 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics11122216 |3 Volltext |
| 912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_NLM | ||
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| 952 | |d 11 |j 2021 |e 12 |b 27 |c 11 | ||