Improving postal survey response using behavioural science : a nested randomised control trial

© 2021. The Author(s)..

BACKGROUND: Systematic reviews have identified effective strategies for increasing postal response rates to questionnaires; however, most studies have isolated single techniques, testing the effect of each one individually. Despite providing insight into explanatory mechanisms, this approach lacks ecological validity, given that multiple techniques are often combined in routine practice.

METHODS: We used a two-armed parallel randomised controlled trial (n = 2702), nested within a cross-sectional health survey study, to evaluate whether using a pragmatic combination of behavioural science and evidenced-based techniques (e.g., personalisation, social norms messaging) in a study invitation letter increased response to the survey, when compared with a standard invitation letter. Participants and outcome assessors were blinded to group assignment. We tested this in a sample of women testing positive for human papillomavirus (HPV) at cervical cancer screening in England.

RESULTS: Overall, 646 participants responded to the survey (response rate [RR] = 23.9%). Logistic regression revealed higher odds of response in the intervention arm (n = 357/1353, RR = 26.4%) compared with the control arm (n = 289/1349, RR = 21.4%), while adjusting for age, deprivation, clinical site, and clinical test result (aOR = 1.30, 95% CI: 1.09-1.55).

CONCLUSION: Applying easy-to-implement behavioural science and evidence-based methods to routine invitation letters improved postal response to a health-related survey, whilst adjusting for demographic characteristics. Our findings provide support for the pragmatic adoption of combined techniques in routine research to increase response to postal surveys.

TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCTN, ISRCTN15113095 . Registered 7 May 2019 - retrospectively registered.

Medienart:

E-Artikel

Erscheinungsjahr:

2021

Erschienen:

2021

Enthalten in:

Zur Gesamtaufnahme - volume:21

Enthalten in:

BMC medical research methodology - 21(2021), 1 vom: 18. Dez., Seite 280

Sprache:

Englisch

Beteiligte Personen:

McBride, Emily [VerfasserIn]
Mase, Hiromi [VerfasserIn]
Kerrison, Robert S [VerfasserIn]
Marlow, Laura A V [VerfasserIn]
Waller, Jo [VerfasserIn]

Links:

Volltext

Themen:

Behavioural science
Journal Article
Methodology
Postal response
RCT
Randomized Controlled Trial
Recruitment
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Trials

Anmerkungen:

Date Completed 24.01.2022

Date Revised 24.01.2022

published: Electronic

Citation Status MEDLINE

doi:

10.1186/s12874-021-01476-7

funding:

Förderinstitution / Projekttitel:

PPN (Katalog-ID):

NLM334585198