Accounting of gross ecosystem product in Fuzhou City,China
Carrying out the accounting of ecological system gross ecosystem product (GEP) is a necessary measure to promote the construction of ecological civilization system and an important measure for the integration of ecological benefits into the economic and social development evaluation system. Taking Fuzhou City as the object, we constructed an ecosystem value accounting system with the characteristics of "mountain, sea, and city" to calculate the GEP of Fuzhou City in 2015 and 2018, and compared them from the perspective of temporal and spatial changes. The results showed that the GEP of Fuzhou in 2015 and 2018 was 920.592 and 1047.242 billion yuan, respectively. The per capita GEP in 2015 and 2018 was 130200 and 143900 yuan, the supply service value of ecological products was 94.181 and 110.261 billion yuan, the value of ecological regulation was 636.42 and 598.851 billion yuan, and the service value of ecological culture was 189.991 and 338.13 billion yuan, respectively. Compared with that in 2015, the GEP of Fuzhou City in 2018 increased by 126.65 billion yuan, with an increase of 13.8%, which was mainly due to the increases in ecological product supply service and cultural service. The value of ecological regulation services decreased by 37.569 billion yuan, with a reduction of 5.9%, which was mainly due to the decreases in climate regulation, water flow regulation and water purification services. Fuzhou City took the lead in exploring the establishment of accounting system with the characteristics of "mountain, sea, and city", which could provide a "Fuzhou model" for the accounting work of other cities in Fujian Province and other regions in China, and promote the establishment of a long-term mechanism for realizing the value of ecological products.
| Medienart: |
E-Artikel |
|---|
| Erscheinungsjahr: |
2021 |
|---|---|
| Erschienen: |
2021 |
| Enthalten in: |
Zur Gesamtaufnahme - volume:32 |
|---|---|
| Enthalten in: |
Ying yong sheng tai xue bao = The journal of applied ecology - 32(2021), 11 vom: 15. Nov., Seite 3835-3844 |
| Sprache: |
Englisch |
|---|
| Weiterer Titel: |
福州市生态系统生产总值核算 |
|---|
| Beteiligte Personen: |
Deng, Jiao-Jiao [VerfasserIn] |
|---|
| Links: |
|---|
| Themen: |
“mountain, sea, and city” feature |
|---|
| Anmerkungen: |
Date Completed 14.12.2021 Date Revised 14.12.2021 published: Print Citation Status MEDLINE |
|---|
| doi: |
10.13287/j.1001-9332.202111.018 |
|---|
| funding: |
|
|---|---|
| Förderinstitution / Projekttitel: |
|
| PPN (Katalog-ID): |
NLM334345758 |
|---|
| LEADER | 01000naa a22002652 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | NLM334345758 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20231225223520.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 231225s2021 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.13287/j.1001-9332.202111.018 |2 doi | |
| 028 | 5 | 2 | |a pubmed24n1114.xml |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)NLM334345758 | ||
| 035 | |a (NLM)34898099 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Deng, Jiao-Jiao |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Accounting of gross ecosystem product in Fuzhou City,China |
| 246 | 3 | 3 | |a 福州市生态系统生产总值核算 |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2021 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a ƒaComputermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a ƒa Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 500 | |a Date Completed 14.12.2021 | ||
| 500 | |a Date Revised 14.12.2021 | ||
| 500 | |a published: Print | ||
| 500 | |a Citation Status MEDLINE | ||
| 520 | |a Carrying out the accounting of ecological system gross ecosystem product (GEP) is a necessary measure to promote the construction of ecological civilization system and an important measure for the integration of ecological benefits into the economic and social development evaluation system. Taking Fuzhou City as the object, we constructed an ecosystem value accounting system with the characteristics of "mountain, sea, and city" to calculate the GEP of Fuzhou City in 2015 and 2018, and compared them from the perspective of temporal and spatial changes. The results showed that the GEP of Fuzhou in 2015 and 2018 was 920.592 and 1047.242 billion yuan, respectively. The per capita GEP in 2015 and 2018 was 130200 and 143900 yuan, the supply service value of ecological products was 94.181 and 110.261 billion yuan, the value of ecological regulation was 636.42 and 598.851 billion yuan, and the service value of ecological culture was 189.991 and 338.13 billion yuan, respectively. Compared with that in 2015, the GEP of Fuzhou City in 2018 increased by 126.65 billion yuan, with an increase of 13.8%, which was mainly due to the increases in ecological product supply service and cultural service. The value of ecological regulation services decreased by 37.569 billion yuan, with a reduction of 5.9%, which was mainly due to the decreases in climate regulation, water flow regulation and water purification services. Fuzhou City took the lead in exploring the establishment of accounting system with the characteristics of "mountain, sea, and city", which could provide a "Fuzhou model" for the accounting work of other cities in Fujian Province and other regions in China, and promote the establishment of a long-term mechanism for realizing the value of ecological products | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Journal Article | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Fuzhou City. | |
| 650 | 4 | |a accounting system | |
| 650 | 4 | |a gross ecosystem product | |
| 650 | 4 | |a “mountain, sea, and city” feature | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Chang, Lu |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Zhang, Yue |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Zhou, Wang-Ming |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Qi, Lin |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Zhou, Li |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Yu, Da-Pao |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Ying yong sheng tai xue bao = The journal of applied ecology |d 1998 |g 32(2021), 11 vom: 15. Nov., Seite 3835-3844 |w (DE-627)NLM093687095 |x 1001-9332 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:32 |g year:2021 |g number:11 |g day:15 |g month:11 |g pages:3835-3844 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u http://dx.doi.org/10.13287/j.1001-9332.202111.018 |3 Volltext |
| 912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_NLM | ||
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| 952 | |d 32 |j 2021 |e 11 |b 15 |c 11 |h 3835-3844 | ||