Spatial Modeling of COVID-19 Vaccine Hesitancy in the United States
Vaccine hesitancy refers to delay in acceptance or refusal of vaccines despite the availability of vaccine services. Despite the efforts of United States healthcare providers to vaccinate the bulk of its population, vaccine hesitancy is still a severe challenge that has led to the resurgence of COVID-19 cases to over 100,000 people during early August 2021. To our knowledge, there are limited nationwide studies that examined the spatial distribution of vaccination rates, mainly based on the social vulnerability index (SVI). In this study, we compiled a database of the percentage of fully vaccinated people at the county scale across the continental United States as of 29 July 2021, along with SVI data as potential significant covariates. We further employed multiscale geographically weighted regression to model spatial nonstationarity of vaccination rates. Our findings indicated that the model could explain over 79% of the variance of vaccination rate based on Per capita income and Minority (%) (with positive impacts), and Age 17 and younger (%), Mobile homes (%), and Uninsured people (%) (with negative effects). However, the impact of each covariate varied for different counties due to using separate optimal bandwidths. This timely study can serve as a geospatial reference to support public health decision-makers in forming region-specific policies in monitoring vaccination programs from a geographic perspective.
| Medienart: |
E-Artikel |
|---|
| Erscheinungsjahr: |
2021 |
|---|---|
| Erschienen: |
2021 |
| Enthalten in: |
Zur Gesamtaufnahme - volume:18 |
|---|---|
| Enthalten in: |
International journal of environmental research and public health - 18(2021), 18 vom: 08. Sept. |
| Sprache: |
Englisch |
|---|
| Beteiligte Personen: |
Mollalo, Abolfazl [VerfasserIn] |
|---|
| Links: |
|---|
| Themen: |
COVID-19 |
|---|
| Anmerkungen: |
Date Completed 01.10.2021 Date Revised 07.11.2023 published: Electronic Citation Status MEDLINE |
|---|
| doi: |
10.3390/ijerph18189488 |
|---|
| funding: |
|
|---|---|
| Förderinstitution / Projekttitel: |
|
| PPN (Katalog-ID): |
NLM331160285 |
|---|
| LEADER | 01000naa a22002652 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | NLM331160285 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20231225212840.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 231225s2021 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.3390/ijerph18189488 |2 doi | |
| 028 | 5 | 2 | |a pubmed24n1103.xml |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)NLM331160285 | ||
| 035 | |a (NLM)34574416 | ||
| 035 | |a (PII)9488 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Mollalo, Abolfazl |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Spatial Modeling of COVID-19 Vaccine Hesitancy in the United States |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2021 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a ƒaComputermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a ƒa Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 500 | |a Date Completed 01.10.2021 | ||
| 500 | |a Date Revised 07.11.2023 | ||
| 500 | |a published: Electronic | ||
| 500 | |a Citation Status MEDLINE | ||
| 520 | |a Vaccine hesitancy refers to delay in acceptance or refusal of vaccines despite the availability of vaccine services. Despite the efforts of United States healthcare providers to vaccinate the bulk of its population, vaccine hesitancy is still a severe challenge that has led to the resurgence of COVID-19 cases to over 100,000 people during early August 2021. To our knowledge, there are limited nationwide studies that examined the spatial distribution of vaccination rates, mainly based on the social vulnerability index (SVI). In this study, we compiled a database of the percentage of fully vaccinated people at the county scale across the continental United States as of 29 July 2021, along with SVI data as potential significant covariates. We further employed multiscale geographically weighted regression to model spatial nonstationarity of vaccination rates. Our findings indicated that the model could explain over 79% of the variance of vaccination rate based on Per capita income and Minority (%) (with positive impacts), and Age 17 and younger (%), Mobile homes (%), and Uninsured people (%) (with negative effects). However, the impact of each covariate varied for different counties due to using separate optimal bandwidths. This timely study can serve as a geospatial reference to support public health decision-makers in forming region-specific policies in monitoring vaccination programs from a geographic perspective | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Journal Article | |
| 650 | 4 | |a COVID-19 | |
| 650 | 4 | |a GIS | |
| 650 | 4 | |a multiscale GWR | |
| 650 | 4 | |a vaccination | |
| 650 | 4 | |a vaccine hesitancy | |
| 650 | 7 | |a COVID-19 Vaccines |2 NLM | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Vaccines |2 NLM | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Tatar, Moosa |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t International journal of environmental research and public health |d 2004 |g 18(2021), 18 vom: 08. Sept. |w (DE-627)NLM162777434 |x 1660-4601 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:18 |g year:2021 |g number:18 |g day:08 |g month:09 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18189488 |3 Volltext |
| 912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_NLM | ||
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| 952 | |d 18 |j 2021 |e 18 |b 08 |c 09 | ||