Evaluation of the validity of Ag PANBIO-COVID19 in the diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 infection in asymptomatic or mildly infected patients
©The Author 2021. Published by Sociedad Española de Quimioterapia. This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0)(https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/)..
OBJECTIVE: To assess the validity of SARS-CoV-2 Antigen (Ag) detection for the diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 infection in mildly infected or asymptomatic patients.
METHODS: Observational study to evaluate diagnostic tests. Non-hospitalized patients with indication for diagnostic testing for SARS-CoV-2 infection were included. The diagnostic test to be evaluated was the determination of Ag and as a reference standard to determine the presence of viral RNA the RT-PCR was used.
RESULTS: A total of 494 patients were included. Of these 71.5% (353/494) had symptoms and 28.5% (141/494) were asymptomatic (presurgery screening (35/494) and confirmed case-contact (106/494). The overall sensitivity of the Ag test was 61.1% and the specificity was 99.7%. The sensitivity and specificity in the asymptomatic group were 40% and 100% respectively, and in the symptomatic group 63.5% and 99.6% respectively. In turn, the sensitivity and specificity in the group of symptomatic patients varied according to the time of symptom evolution: in patients with recent symptoms, they were 71.4% and 99.6% respectively, while in patients with symptoms of more than 5 days of evolution, they were 26.7% and 100% respectively. In all groups studied, the presence of antigen is associated with a high viral load (Ct<30 cycles).
CONCLUSIONS: The use of Ag detection test is not indicated for the diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 infection in asymptomatic patients or with symptoms of more than 5 days of evolution, but it could be useful in patients with symptoms of 1-5 days of evolution.
Medienart: |
E-Artikel |
---|
Erscheinungsjahr: |
2021 |
---|---|
Erschienen: |
2021 |
Enthalten in: |
Zur Gesamtaufnahme - volume:34 |
---|---|
Enthalten in: |
Revista espanola de quimioterapia : publicacion oficial de la Sociedad Espanola de Quimioterapia - 34(2021), 6 vom: 22. Dez., Seite 618-622 |
Sprache: |
Spanisch |
---|
Weiterer Titel: |
Evaluación de la validez del Ag PANBIO-COVID19 de Abbott en el diagnóstico de la infección por SARS-CoV-2 en pacientes asintomáticos o con infección leve |
---|
Beteiligte Personen: |
Gras-Valenti, P [VerfasserIn] |
---|
Links: |
---|
Themen: |
Antigen |
---|
Anmerkungen: |
Date Completed 26.11.2021 Date Revised 11.12.2021 published: Print-Electronic Citation Status MEDLINE |
---|
doi: |
10.37201/req/054.2021 |
---|
funding: |
|
---|---|
Förderinstitution / Projekttitel: |
|
PPN (Katalog-ID): |
NLM330913670 |
---|
LEADER | 01000naa a22002652 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | NLM330913670 | ||
003 | DE-627 | ||
005 | 20231225212323.0 | ||
007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
008 | 231225s2021 xx |||||o 00| ||spa c | ||
024 | 7 | |a 10.37201/req/054.2021 |2 doi | |
028 | 5 | 2 | |a pubmed24n1103.xml |
035 | |a (DE-627)NLM330913670 | ||
035 | |a (NLM)34549577 | ||
035 | |a (PII)ventero22sep2021 | ||
040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
041 | |a spa | ||
100 | 1 | |a Gras-Valenti, P |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 0 | |a Evaluation of the validity of Ag PANBIO-COVID19 in the diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 infection in asymptomatic or mildly infected patients |
246 | 3 | 3 | |a Evaluación de la validez del Ag PANBIO-COVID19 de Abbott en el diagnóstico de la infección por SARS-CoV-2 en pacientes asintomáticos o con infección leve |
264 | 1 | |c 2021 | |
336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |a ƒaComputermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |a ƒa Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
500 | |a Date Completed 26.11.2021 | ||
500 | |a Date Revised 11.12.2021 | ||
500 | |a published: Print-Electronic | ||
500 | |a Citation Status MEDLINE | ||
520 | |a ©The Author 2021. Published by Sociedad Española de Quimioterapia. This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0)(https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/). | ||
520 | |a OBJECTIVE: To assess the validity of SARS-CoV-2 Antigen (Ag) detection for the diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 infection in mildly infected or asymptomatic patients | ||
520 | |a METHODS: Observational study to evaluate diagnostic tests. Non-hospitalized patients with indication for diagnostic testing for SARS-CoV-2 infection were included. The diagnostic test to be evaluated was the determination of Ag and as a reference standard to determine the presence of viral RNA the RT-PCR was used | ||
520 | |a RESULTS: A total of 494 patients were included. Of these 71.5% (353/494) had symptoms and 28.5% (141/494) were asymptomatic (presurgery screening (35/494) and confirmed case-contact (106/494). The overall sensitivity of the Ag test was 61.1% and the specificity was 99.7%. The sensitivity and specificity in the asymptomatic group were 40% and 100% respectively, and in the symptomatic group 63.5% and 99.6% respectively. In turn, the sensitivity and specificity in the group of symptomatic patients varied according to the time of symptom evolution: in patients with recent symptoms, they were 71.4% and 99.6% respectively, while in patients with symptoms of more than 5 days of evolution, they were 26.7% and 100% respectively. In all groups studied, the presence of antigen is associated with a high viral load (Ct<30 cycles) | ||
520 | |a CONCLUSIONS: The use of Ag detection test is not indicated for the diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 infection in asymptomatic patients or with symptoms of more than 5 days of evolution, but it could be useful in patients with symptoms of 1-5 days of evolution | ||
650 | 4 | |a Journal Article | |
650 | 4 | |a Observational Study | |
650 | 4 | |a COVID-19 | |
650 | 4 | |a SARS-CoV-2 | |
650 | 4 | |a antigen | |
650 | 4 | |a diagnosis | |
700 | 1 | |a Vidal, I |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Montiel-Higuero, I |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Escribano, I |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Algado-Selles, N |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Chico-Sánchez, P |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Ventero, M P |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Jiménez-Sepulveda, N |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Molina-Pardines, C |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Merino-Lucas, E |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Sánchez-Payá, J |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Rodríguez, J C |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Revista espanola de quimioterapia : publicacion oficial de la Sociedad Espanola de Quimioterapia |d 1997 |g 34(2021), 6 vom: 22. Dez., Seite 618-622 |w (DE-627)NLM090649028 |x 1988-9518 |7 nnns |
773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:34 |g year:2021 |g number:6 |g day:22 |g month:12 |g pages:618-622 |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u http://dx.doi.org/10.37201/req/054.2021 |3 Volltext |
912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
912 | |a GBV_NLM | ||
951 | |a AR | ||
952 | |d 34 |j 2021 |e 6 |b 22 |c 12 |h 618-622 |