Laparoscopic versus open liver resection for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma : Report of an international multicenter cohort study with propensity score matching
Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved..
BACKGROUND: Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma is a rare disease with a poor prognosis. In patients where surgical resection is possible, outcome is influenced by perioperative morbidity and lymph node status. Laparoscopic liver resection is associated with improved clinical and oncological outcomes in primary and metastatic liver cancer compared with open liver resection, but evidence on intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma is still insufficient. The primary aim of this study was to compare overall survival for a large series of patients treated for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma by open or laparoscopic approach. Secondary objectives were to compare disease-free survival, predictors of death, and recurrence.
METHODS: Patients treated with laparoscopic or open liver resection for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma from 2000 to 2018 from 3 large international databases were analyzed retrospectively. Each patient in the laparoscopic resection group (case) was matched with 1 open resection control (1:1 ratio), through a propensity score calculated on clinically relevant preoperative covariates. Overall and disease-free survival were compared between the matched groups. Predictors of mortality and recurrence were analyzed with Cox regression, and the Textbook Outcomes were described.
RESULTS: During the study period, 855 patients met the inclusion criteria (open liver resection = 709, 82.9%; laparoscopic liver resection = 146, 17.1%). Two groups of 89 patients each were analyzed after propensity score matching, with no significant difference regarding pre- and postoperative variables. Overall survival at 1, 3, and 5 years was 92%, 75%, and 63% in the laparoscopic liver resection group versus 92%, 58%, and 49% in the open liver resection group (P = .0043). Adjusted Cox regression revealed severe postoperative complications (hazard ratio: 10.5, 95% confidence interval [1.01-109] P = .049) and steatosis (hazard ratio: 13.8, 95% confidence interval [1.23-154] P = .033) as predictors of death, and transfusion (hazard ratio: 19.2, 95% confidence interval [4.04-91.4] P < .001) and severe postoperative complications (hazard ratio: 4.07, 95% confidence interval [1.15-14.4] P = .030) as predictors of recurrence.
CONCLUSION: The survival advantage of laparoscopic liver resection over open liver resection for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma is equivocal, given historical bias and missing data.
| Medienart: |
E-Artikel |
|---|
| Erscheinungsjahr: |
2022 |
|---|---|
| Erschienen: |
2022 |
| Enthalten in: |
Zur Gesamtaufnahme - volume:171 |
|---|---|
| Enthalten in: |
Surgery - 171(2022), 5 vom: 22. Mai, Seite 1290-1302 |
| Sprache: |
Englisch |
|---|
| Beteiligte Personen: |
Brustia, Raffaele [VerfasserIn] |
|---|
| Links: |
|---|
| Themen: |
|---|
| Anmerkungen: |
Date Completed 02.05.2022 Date Revised 19.05.2022 published: Print-Electronic Citation Status MEDLINE |
|---|
| doi: |
10.1016/j.surg.2021.08.015 |
|---|
| funding: |
|
|---|---|
| Förderinstitution / Projekttitel: |
|
| PPN (Katalog-ID): |
NLM330772287 |
|---|
| LEADER | 01000naa a22002652 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | NLM330772287 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20231225212013.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 231225s2022 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1016/j.surg.2021.08.015 |2 doi | |
| 028 | 5 | 2 | |a pubmed24n1102.xml |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)NLM330772287 | ||
| 035 | |a (NLM)34535270 | ||
| 035 | |a (PII)S0039-6060(21)00785-6 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Brustia, Raffaele |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Laparoscopic versus open liver resection for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma |b Report of an international multicenter cohort study with propensity score matching |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2022 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a ƒaComputermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a ƒa Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 500 | |a Date Completed 02.05.2022 | ||
| 500 | |a Date Revised 19.05.2022 | ||
| 500 | |a published: Print-Electronic | ||
| 500 | |a Citation Status MEDLINE | ||
| 520 | |a Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. | ||
| 520 | |a BACKGROUND: Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma is a rare disease with a poor prognosis. In patients where surgical resection is possible, outcome is influenced by perioperative morbidity and lymph node status. Laparoscopic liver resection is associated with improved clinical and oncological outcomes in primary and metastatic liver cancer compared with open liver resection, but evidence on intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma is still insufficient. The primary aim of this study was to compare overall survival for a large series of patients treated for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma by open or laparoscopic approach. Secondary objectives were to compare disease-free survival, predictors of death, and recurrence | ||
| 520 | |a METHODS: Patients treated with laparoscopic or open liver resection for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma from 2000 to 2018 from 3 large international databases were analyzed retrospectively. Each patient in the laparoscopic resection group (case) was matched with 1 open resection control (1:1 ratio), through a propensity score calculated on clinically relevant preoperative covariates. Overall and disease-free survival were compared between the matched groups. Predictors of mortality and recurrence were analyzed with Cox regression, and the Textbook Outcomes were described | ||
| 520 | |a RESULTS: During the study period, 855 patients met the inclusion criteria (open liver resection = 709, 82.9%; laparoscopic liver resection = 146, 17.1%). Two groups of 89 patients each were analyzed after propensity score matching, with no significant difference regarding pre- and postoperative variables. Overall survival at 1, 3, and 5 years was 92%, 75%, and 63% in the laparoscopic liver resection group versus 92%, 58%, and 49% in the open liver resection group (P = .0043). Adjusted Cox regression revealed severe postoperative complications (hazard ratio: 10.5, 95% confidence interval [1.01-109] P = .049) and steatosis (hazard ratio: 13.8, 95% confidence interval [1.23-154] P = .033) as predictors of death, and transfusion (hazard ratio: 19.2, 95% confidence interval [4.04-91.4] P < .001) and severe postoperative complications (hazard ratio: 4.07, 95% confidence interval [1.15-14.4] P = .030) as predictors of recurrence | ||
| 520 | |a CONCLUSION: The survival advantage of laparoscopic liver resection over open liver resection for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma is equivocal, given historical bias and missing data | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Journal Article | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Multicenter Study | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Laurent, Alexis |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Goumard, Claire |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Langella, Serena |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Cherqui, Daniel |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Kawai, Takayuki |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Soubrane, Olivier |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Cauchy, Francois |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Farges, Olivier |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Menahem, Benjamin |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Hobeika, Christian |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Rhaiem, Rami |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Sommacale, Daniele |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Okumura, Shinya |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Hofmeyr, Stefan |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Ferrero, Alessandro |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Pruvot, François-René |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Regimbeau, Jean-Marc |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Fuks, David |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Vibert, Eric |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Scatton, Olivier |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 0 | |a AFC-ICC-2009 |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 0 | |a AFC-LLR-2018 |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 0 | |a PRS-2019 Study group |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Abba, Julio |e investigator |4 oth | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Adam, René |e investigator |4 oth | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Adham, Mustapha |e investigator |4 oth | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Allard, Marc-Antoine |e investigator |4 oth | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Ayav, Ahmet |e investigator |4 oth | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Azoulay, Daniel |e investigator |4 oth | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Bachellier, Philippe |e investigator |4 oth | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Balladur, Pierre |e investigator |4 oth | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Barbier, Louise |e investigator |4 oth | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Barbieux, Julien |e investigator |4 oth | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Boleslawski, Emmanuel |e investigator |4 oth | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Boudjema, Karim |e investigator |4 oth | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Bougard, M |e investigator |4 oth | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Buc, Emmanuel |e investigator |4 oth | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Bucur, Petru |e investigator |4 oth | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Carmelo, Antoine |e investigator |4 oth | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Chatelain, Denis |e investigator |4 oth | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Chauvat, Jean |e investigator |4 oth | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Cherkaoui, Zineb |e investigator |4 oth | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Chiche, Laurence |e investigator |4 oth | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Chirica, Mircea |e investigator |4 oth | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Ciacio, Oriana |e investigator |4 oth | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Codjia, Tatiana |e investigator |4 oth | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Colli, Fabio |e investigator |4 oth | |
| 700 | 1 | |a De Carlis, Luciano |e investigator |4 oth | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Delpero, Jean-Robert |e investigator |4 oth | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Demartines, Nicolas |e investigator |4 oth | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Detry, Olivier |e investigator |4 oth | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Sanches, Marcelo Dias |e investigator |4 oth | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Diouf, Momar |e investigator |4 oth | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Doussot, Alexandre |e investigator |4 oth | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Ducerf, Christian |e investigator |4 oth | |
| 700 | 1 | |a El Amrani, Mehdi |e investigator |4 oth | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Ewald, Jacques |e investigator |4 oth | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Fabre, Jean-Marc |e investigator |4 oth | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Fagot, Hervé |e investigator |4 oth | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Famularo, Simone |e investigator |4 oth | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Ferre, Léo |e investigator |4 oth | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Fleres, Francesco |e investigator |4 oth | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Fonseca, Gilton Marques |e investigator |4 oth | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Gayet, Brice |e investigator |4 oth | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Giacomoni, Alessandro |e investigator |4 oth | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Gigot, Jean-Francois |e investigator |4 oth | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Girard, E |e investigator |4 oth | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Golse, Nicolas |e investigator |4 oth | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Gregoire, Emilie |e investigator |4 oth | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Hardwigsen, Jean |e investigator |4 oth | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Herman, Paulo |e investigator |4 oth | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Hor, Thevi |e investigator |4 oth | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Jehaes, François |e investigator |4 oth | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Kianmanesh, Ali-Reza |e investigator |4 oth | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Komatsu, Shohei |e investigator |4 oth | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Laroche, Sophie |e investigator |4 oth | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Laurent, Christophe |e investigator |4 oth | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Le Treut, Yves-Patrice |e investigator |4 oth | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Lecolle, K |e investigator |4 oth | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Leourier, Philippe |e investigator |4 oth | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Lermite, Emilie |e investigator |4 oth | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Lesurtel, Mikael |e investigator |4 oth | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Letoublon, Christian |e investigator |4 oth | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Leyman, Paul |e investigator |4 oth | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Lubrano, Jean |e investigator |4 oth | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Mabrut, Jean-Yves |e investigator |4 oth | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Mantion, Georges |e investigator |4 oth | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Marchese, Ugo |e investigator |4 oth | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Memeo, Riccardo |e investigator |4 oth | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Millet, Guillaume |e investigator |4 oth | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Mohkam, Kayvan |e investigator |4 oth | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Mulliri, André |e investigator |4 oth | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Muscari, Fabrice |e investigator |4 oth | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Navarro, Francis |e investigator |4 oth | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Nolasco, Francisco |e investigator |4 oth | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Nomi, Takeo |e investigator |4 oth | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Nunoz, Jean |e investigator |4 oth | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Nuzzo, Gennaro |e investigator |4 oth | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Oudafal, Nassima |e investigator |4 oth | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Pascal, Gerard |e investigator |4 oth | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Passot, Guillaume |e investigator |4 oth | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Patrice, D |e investigator |4 oth | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Patrono, Damiano |e investigator |4 oth | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Paye, François |e investigator |4 oth | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Perdigao, Fabiano |e investigator |4 oth | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Pessaux, Patrick |e investigator |4 oth | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Petrucciani, Niccolo |e investigator |4 oth | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Pittau, Gabriella |e investigator |4 oth | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Ratajczak, C |e investigator |4 oth | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Raventos, Artigas |e investigator |4 oth | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Rebibo, Lionel |e investigator |4 oth | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Resende, Vivian |e investigator |4 oth | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Rivoire, Michel |e investigator |4 oth | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Romagnoli, Renato |e investigator |4 oth | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Roulin, Didier |e investigator |4 oth | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Sa-Cunha, Antonio |e investigator |4 oth | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Salame, Ephrem |e investigator |4 oth | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Schielke, Astrid |e investigator |4 oth | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Schwarz, Lilian |e investigator |4 oth | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Scotte, Michel |e investigator |4 oth | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Souche, François-Regis |e investigator |4 oth | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Suc, Bertrand |e investigator |4 oth | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Tedeschi, Michele |e investigator |4 oth | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Surgery |d 1945 |g 171(2022), 5 vom: 22. Mai, Seite 1290-1302 |w (DE-627)NLM000023590 |x 1532-7361 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:171 |g year:2022 |g number:5 |g day:22 |g month:05 |g pages:1290-1302 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.surg.2021.08.015 |3 Volltext |
| 912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_NLM | ||
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| 952 | |d 171 |j 2022 |e 5 |b 22 |c 05 |h 1290-1302 | ||