Diagnosis of myositis-associated interstitial lung disease : Utility of the myositis autoantibody line immunoassay
Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved..
OBJECTIVES: The detection of myositis autoantibodies (MA) in patients with interstitial lung disease (ILD) has major implications for diagnosis and management, especially amyopathic and forme frustes of idiopathic inflammatory myositis-associated ILD (IIM-ILD). Use of the MA line immunoblot assay (MA-LIA) in non-rheumatological cohorts remains unvalidated. We assessed the diagnostic performance of the MA-LIA and explored combined models with clinical variables to improve identification of patients with IIM-ILD.
METHODS: Consecutive patients referred to a specialist ILD clinic, with ILD-diagnosis confirmed at multidisciplinary meeting, and MA-LIA performed within six months of baseline were included. Pre-specified MA-LIA thresholds were evaluated for IIM-ILD diagnosis.
RESULTS: A total 247 ILD patients were included (IIM-ILD n = 12, non-IIM connective tissue disease-associated ILD [CTD-ILD] n = 52, idiopathic interstitial pneumonia [IIP] n = 115, other-ILD n = 68). Mean age was 64.8 years, with 45.3% female, mean FVC 75.5% and DLCO 59.2% predicted. MA were present in 13.8% overall and 83.3% of IIM-ILD patients. The most common MA in IIM-ILD and non-IIM ILD patients were anti-Jo-1 (prevalence 40%) and anti-PMScl (29.2%) autoantibodies respectively. The pre-specified low-positive threshold (>10 signal intensity) had the highest discriminative capacity for IIM-ILD (AUC 0.86). Combining MA-LIA with age, gender, clinical CTD-manifestations and an overlap non-specific interstitial pneumonia/organising pneumonia pattern on HRCT improved discrimination for IIM-ILD (AUC 0.96).
CONCLUSION: The MA-LIA is useful to support a diagnosis of IIM-ILD as a complement to multi-disciplinary ILD assessment. Clinical interpretation is optimised by consideration of the strength of the MA-LIA result together with clinical and radiological features of IIM-ILD.
Medienart: |
E-Artikel |
---|
Erscheinungsjahr: |
2021 |
---|---|
Erschienen: |
2021 |
Enthalten in: |
Zur Gesamtaufnahme - volume:187 |
---|---|
Enthalten in: |
Respiratory medicine - 187(2021) vom: 01. Okt., Seite 106581 |
Sprache: |
Englisch |
---|
Beteiligte Personen: |
Jee, Adelle S [VerfasserIn] |
---|
Links: |
---|
Anmerkungen: |
Date Completed 08.02.2022 Date Revised 08.02.2022 published: Print-Electronic Citation Status MEDLINE |
---|
doi: |
10.1016/j.rmed.2021.106581 |
---|
funding: |
|
---|---|
Förderinstitution / Projekttitel: |
|
PPN (Katalog-ID): |
NLM329971301 |
---|
LEADER | 01000naa a22002652 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | NLM329971301 | ||
003 | DE-627 | ||
005 | 20231225210300.0 | ||
007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
008 | 231225s2021 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
024 | 7 | |a 10.1016/j.rmed.2021.106581 |2 doi | |
028 | 5 | 2 | |a pubmed24n1099.xml |
035 | |a (DE-627)NLM329971301 | ||
035 | |a (NLM)34454312 | ||
035 | |a (PII)S0954-6111(21)00288-2 | ||
040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
041 | |a eng | ||
100 | 1 | |a Jee, Adelle S |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 0 | |a Diagnosis of myositis-associated interstitial lung disease |b Utility of the myositis autoantibody line immunoassay |
264 | 1 | |c 2021 | |
336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |a ƒaComputermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |a ƒa Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
500 | |a Date Completed 08.02.2022 | ||
500 | |a Date Revised 08.02.2022 | ||
500 | |a published: Print-Electronic | ||
500 | |a Citation Status MEDLINE | ||
520 | |a Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. | ||
520 | |a OBJECTIVES: The detection of myositis autoantibodies (MA) in patients with interstitial lung disease (ILD) has major implications for diagnosis and management, especially amyopathic and forme frustes of idiopathic inflammatory myositis-associated ILD (IIM-ILD). Use of the MA line immunoblot assay (MA-LIA) in non-rheumatological cohorts remains unvalidated. We assessed the diagnostic performance of the MA-LIA and explored combined models with clinical variables to improve identification of patients with IIM-ILD | ||
520 | |a METHODS: Consecutive patients referred to a specialist ILD clinic, with ILD-diagnosis confirmed at multidisciplinary meeting, and MA-LIA performed within six months of baseline were included. Pre-specified MA-LIA thresholds were evaluated for IIM-ILD diagnosis | ||
520 | |a RESULTS: A total 247 ILD patients were included (IIM-ILD n = 12, non-IIM connective tissue disease-associated ILD [CTD-ILD] n = 52, idiopathic interstitial pneumonia [IIP] n = 115, other-ILD n = 68). Mean age was 64.8 years, with 45.3% female, mean FVC 75.5% and DLCO 59.2% predicted. MA were present in 13.8% overall and 83.3% of IIM-ILD patients. The most common MA in IIM-ILD and non-IIM ILD patients were anti-Jo-1 (prevalence 40%) and anti-PMScl (29.2%) autoantibodies respectively. The pre-specified low-positive threshold (>10 signal intensity) had the highest discriminative capacity for IIM-ILD (AUC 0.86). Combining MA-LIA with age, gender, clinical CTD-manifestations and an overlap non-specific interstitial pneumonia/organising pneumonia pattern on HRCT improved discrimination for IIM-ILD (AUC 0.96) | ||
520 | |a CONCLUSION: The MA-LIA is useful to support a diagnosis of IIM-ILD as a complement to multi-disciplinary ILD assessment. Clinical interpretation is optimised by consideration of the strength of the MA-LIA result together with clinical and radiological features of IIM-ILD | ||
650 | 4 | |a Journal Article | |
650 | 4 | |a Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't | |
650 | 4 | |a Autoimmune disease | |
650 | 4 | |a Connective tissue disease | |
650 | 4 | |a Immunoblot | |
650 | 4 | |a Interstitial lung disease | |
650 | 4 | |a Myositis autoantibody | |
650 | 7 | |a Antibodies, Antinuclear |2 NLM | |
650 | 7 | |a Autoantibodies |2 NLM | |
650 | 7 | |a Biomarkers |2 NLM | |
650 | 7 | |a EXOSC9 protein, human |2 NLM | |
650 | 7 | |a Jo-1 antibody |2 NLM | |
650 | 7 | |a RNA-Binding Proteins |2 NLM | |
650 | 7 | |a Exosome Multienzyme Ribonuclease Complex |2 NLM | |
650 | 7 | |a EC 3.1.- |2 NLM | |
700 | 1 | |a Parker, Matthew J S |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Bleasel, Jane F |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Troy, Lauren K |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Lau, Edmund M |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Jo, Helen E |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Teoh, Alan K Y |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Webster, Susanne |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Adelstein, Stephen |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Corte, Tamera J |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Respiratory medicine |d 1993 |g 187(2021) vom: 01. Okt., Seite 106581 |w (DE-627)NLM012605247 |x 1532-3064 |7 nnns |
773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:187 |g year:2021 |g day:01 |g month:10 |g pages:106581 |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rmed.2021.106581 |3 Volltext |
912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
912 | |a GBV_NLM | ||
951 | |a AR | ||
952 | |d 187 |j 2021 |b 01 |c 10 |h 106581 |