Prospective Multicenter Comparison of Open and Robotic Radical Prostatectomy : The PROST-QA/RP2 Consortium

PURPOSE: Our goal was to evaluate the comparative effectiveness of robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy (RALP) and open radical prostatectomy (ORP) in a multicenter study.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: We evaluated men with localized prostate cancer at 11 high-volume academic medical centers in the United States from the PROST-QA (2003-2006) and the PROST-QA/RP2 cohorts (2010-2013) with a pre-specified goal of comparing RALP (549) and ORP (545). We measured longitudinal patient-reported health-related quality of life (HRQOL) at pre-treatment and at 2, 6, 12, and 24 months, and pathological and perioperative outcomes/complications.

RESULTS: Demographics, cancer characteristics, and margin status were similar between surgical approaches. ORP subjects were more likely to undergo lymphadenectomy (89% vs 47%; p <0.01) and nerve sparing (94% vs 89%; p <0.01). RALP vs ORP subjects experienced less mean intraoperative blood loss (192 vs 805 mL; p <0.01), shorter mean hospital stay (1.6 vs 2.1 days; p <0.01), and fewer blood transfusions (1% vs 4%; p <0.01), wound infections (2% vs 4%; p=0.02), other infections (1% vs 4%; p <0.01), deep venous thromboses (0.5% vs 2%; p=0.04), and bladder neck contractures requiring dilation (1.6% vs 8.3%; p <0.01). RALP subjects reported less pain (p=0.04), less activity interference (p <0.01) and higher incision satisfaction (p <0.01). Surgical approach (RALP vs ORP) was not a significant predictor of longitudinal HRQOL change in any HRQOL domain.

CONCLUSIONS: In high-volume academic centers, RALP and ORP patients may expect similar long-term HRQOL outcomes. Overall, RALP patients have less pain, shorter hospital stays, and fewer post-surgical complications such as blood transfusions, infections, deep venous thromboses, and bladder neck contractures.

Medienart:

E-Artikel

Erscheinungsjahr:

2022

Erschienen:

2022

Enthalten in:

Zur Gesamtaufnahme - volume:207

Enthalten in:

The Journal of urology - 207(2022), 1 vom: 01. Jan., Seite 127-136

Sprache:

Englisch

Beteiligte Personen:

Chang, Peter [VerfasserIn]
Wagner, Andrew A [VerfasserIn]
Regan, Meredith M [VerfasserIn]
Smith, Joseph A [VerfasserIn]
Saigal, Christopher S [VerfasserIn]
Litwin, Mark S [VerfasserIn]
Hu, Jim C [VerfasserIn]
Cooperberg, Matthew R [VerfasserIn]
Carroll, Peter R [VerfasserIn]
Klein, Eric A [VerfasserIn]
Kibel, Adam S [VerfasserIn]
Andriole, Gerald L [VerfasserIn]
Han, Misop [VerfasserIn]
Partin, Alan W [VerfasserIn]
Wood, David P [VerfasserIn]
Crociani, Catrina M [VerfasserIn]
Greenfield, Thomas K [VerfasserIn]
Patil, Dattatraya [VerfasserIn]
Hembroff, Larry A [VerfasserIn]
Davis, Kyle [VerfasserIn]
Stork, Linda [VerfasserIn]
Spratt, Daniel E [VerfasserIn]
Wei, John T [VerfasserIn]
Sanda, Martin G [VerfasserIn]
PROST-QA/RP2 Consortium [VerfasserIn]

Links:

Volltext

Themen:

Comparative Study
Journal Article
Multicenter Study
Prostatectomy
Quality of life
Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural
Robotic surgical procedures

Anmerkungen:

Date Completed 20.01.2022

Date Revised 02.01.2023

published: Print-Electronic

ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01325506

Citation Status MEDLINE

doi:

10.1097/JU.0000000000002176

funding:

Förderinstitution / Projekttitel:

PPN (Katalog-ID):

NLM329764713