Patient and Clinician Characteristics Associated With Secure Message Content : Retrospective Cohort Study

©Dawn Heisey-Grove, Cheryl Rathert, Laura E McClelland, Kevin Jackson, Jonathan P DeShazo. Originally published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research (https://www.jmir.org), 19.08.2021..

BACKGROUND: Good communication has been shown to affect patient outcomes; however, the effect varies according to patient and clinician characteristics. To date, no research has explored the differences in the content of secure messages based on these characteristics.

OBJECTIVE: This study aims to explore characteristics of patients and clinic staff associated with the content exchanged in secure messages.

METHODS: We coded 18,309 messages that were part of threads initiated by 1031 patients with hypertension, diabetes, or both conditions, in communication with 711 staff members. We conducted four sets of analyses to identify associations between patient characteristics and the types of messages they sent, staff characteristics and the types of messages they sent, staff characteristics and the types of messages patients sent to them, and patient characteristics and the types of messages they received from staff. Logistic regression was used to estimate the strength of the associations.

RESULTS: We found that younger patients had reduced odds of sharing clinical updates (odds ratio [OR] 0.77, 95% CI 0.65-0.91) and requesting prescription refills (OR 0.77, 95% CI 0.65-0.90). Women had reduced odds of self-reporting biometrics (OR 0.78, 95% CI 0.62-0.98) but greater odds of responding to a clinician (OR 1.20, 95% CI 1.02-1.42) and seeking medical guidance (OR 1.19, 95% CI 1.01-1.40). Compared with White patients, Black patients had greater odds of requesting preventive care (OR 2.68, 95% CI 1.30-5.51) but reduced odds of requesting a new or changed prescription (OR 0.72, 95% CI 0.53-0.98) or laboratory or other diagnostic procedures (OR 0.66, 95% CI 0.46-0.95). Staff had lower odds of sharing medical guidance with younger patients (OR 0.83, 95% CI 0.69-1.00) and uninsured patients (OR 0.21, 95% CI 0.06-0.73) but had greater odds of sharing medical guidance with patients with public payers (OR 2.03, 95% CI 1.26-3.25) compared with patients with private payers. Staff had reduced odds of confirming to women that their requests were fulfilled (OR 0.82, 95% CI 0.69-0.98). Compared with physicians, nurse practitioners had greater odds of sharing medical guidance with patients (OR 2.74, 95% CI 1.12-6.68) and receiving prescription refill requests (OR 3.39, 95% CI 1.49-7.71). Registered nurses had greater odds of deferred information sharing (OR 1.61, 95% CI 1.04-2.49) and receiving responses to messages (OR 3.93, 95% CI 2.18-7.11) than physicians.

CONCLUSIONS: The differences we found in content use based on patient characteristics could lead to the exacerbation of health disparities when content is associated with health outcomes. Disparities in the content of secure messages could exacerbate disparities in patient outcomes, such as satisfaction, trust in the system, self-care, and health outcomes. Staff and administrators should evaluate how secure messaging is used to ensure that disparities in care are not perpetuated via this communication modality.

Medienart:

E-Artikel

Erscheinungsjahr:

2021

Erschienen:

2021

Enthalten in:

Zur Gesamtaufnahme - volume:23

Enthalten in:

Journal of medical Internet research - 23(2021), 8 vom: 19. Aug., Seite e26650

Sprache:

Englisch

Beteiligte Personen:

Heisey-Grove, Dawn [VerfasserIn]
Rathert, Cheryl [VerfasserIn]
McClelland, Laura E [VerfasserIn]
Jackson, Kevin [VerfasserIn]
DeShazo, Jonathan P [VerfasserIn]

Links:

Volltext

Themen:

Diabetes
Electronic messaging
Hypertension
Journal Article
Patient-provider communication

Anmerkungen:

Date Completed 26.10.2021

Date Revised 26.10.2021

published: Electronic

Citation Status MEDLINE

doi:

10.2196/26650

funding:

Förderinstitution / Projekttitel:

PPN (Katalog-ID):

NLM329642855