SARS-CoV-2 natural infection in animals : a systematic review of studies and case reports and series
COVID-19 pandemic is essentially a zoonotic disease. In this context, early in 2020, transmission from humans to certain animals began reporting; the number of studies has grown since. To estimate the pooled prevalence of SARS-CoV-2 natural infection in animals and to determine differences in prevalence between countries, years, animal types and diagnostic methods (RT-PCR or serological tests). A systematic literature review with meta-analysis using eight databases. Observational studies were included but analyzed separately. We performed a random-effects model meta-analysis to calculate the pooled prevalence and 95% confidence interval (95% CI) for prevalence studies and case series. After the screening, 65 reports were selected for full-text assessment and included for qualitative and quantitative analyses. A total of 24 reports assessed SARS-CoV-2 infection by RT-PCR, combining a total of 321,785 animals, yielding a pooled prevalence of 12.3% (95% CI 11.6%-13.0%). Also, a total of 17 studies additionally assessed serological response against SARS-CoV-2, including nine by ELISA, four by PRTN, one by MIA, one by immunochromatography (rest, two studies, the method was not specified), combining a total of 5319 animals, yielding a pooled prevalence of 29.4% (95% CI 22.9%-35.9%). A considerable proportion of animals resulted infected by SARS-CoV-2, ranking minks among the highest value, followed by dogs and cats. Further studies in other animals are required to define the extent and importance of natural infection due to SARS-CoV-2. These findings have multiple implications for public human and animal health. One Health approach in this context is critical for prevention and control.
Medienart: |
E-Artikel |
---|
Erscheinungsjahr: |
2021 |
---|---|
Erschienen: |
2021 |
Enthalten in: |
Zur Gesamtaufnahme - volume:41 |
---|---|
Enthalten in: |
The veterinary quarterly - 41(2021), 1 vom: 31. Dez., Seite 250-267 |
Sprache: |
Englisch |
---|
Beteiligte Personen: |
Bonilla-Aldana, D Katterine [VerfasserIn] |
---|
Links: |
---|
Themen: |
Animals |
---|
Anmerkungen: |
Date Completed 13.09.2021 Date Revised 13.09.2021 published: Print Citation Status MEDLINE |
---|
doi: |
10.1080/01652176.2021.1970280 |
---|
funding: |
|
---|---|
Förderinstitution / Projekttitel: |
|
PPN (Katalog-ID): |
NLM329504355 |
---|
LEADER | 01000naa a22002652 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | NLM329504355 | ||
003 | DE-627 | ||
005 | 20231225205248.0 | ||
007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
008 | 231225s2021 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
024 | 7 | |a 10.1080/01652176.2021.1970280 |2 doi | |
028 | 5 | 2 | |a pubmed24n1098.xml |
035 | |a (DE-627)NLM329504355 | ||
035 | |a (NLM)34406913 | ||
040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
041 | |a eng | ||
100 | 1 | |a Bonilla-Aldana, D Katterine |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 0 | |a SARS-CoV-2 natural infection in animals |b a systematic review of studies and case reports and series |
264 | 1 | |c 2021 | |
336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |a ƒaComputermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |a ƒa Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
500 | |a Date Completed 13.09.2021 | ||
500 | |a Date Revised 13.09.2021 | ||
500 | |a published: Print | ||
500 | |a Citation Status MEDLINE | ||
520 | |a COVID-19 pandemic is essentially a zoonotic disease. In this context, early in 2020, transmission from humans to certain animals began reporting; the number of studies has grown since. To estimate the pooled prevalence of SARS-CoV-2 natural infection in animals and to determine differences in prevalence between countries, years, animal types and diagnostic methods (RT-PCR or serological tests). A systematic literature review with meta-analysis using eight databases. Observational studies were included but analyzed separately. We performed a random-effects model meta-analysis to calculate the pooled prevalence and 95% confidence interval (95% CI) for prevalence studies and case series. After the screening, 65 reports were selected for full-text assessment and included for qualitative and quantitative analyses. A total of 24 reports assessed SARS-CoV-2 infection by RT-PCR, combining a total of 321,785 animals, yielding a pooled prevalence of 12.3% (95% CI 11.6%-13.0%). Also, a total of 17 studies additionally assessed serological response against SARS-CoV-2, including nine by ELISA, four by PRTN, one by MIA, one by immunochromatography (rest, two studies, the method was not specified), combining a total of 5319 animals, yielding a pooled prevalence of 29.4% (95% CI 22.9%-35.9%). A considerable proportion of animals resulted infected by SARS-CoV-2, ranking minks among the highest value, followed by dogs and cats. Further studies in other animals are required to define the extent and importance of natural infection due to SARS-CoV-2. These findings have multiple implications for public human and animal health. One Health approach in this context is critical for prevention and control | ||
650 | 4 | |a Journal Article | |
650 | 4 | |a Meta-Analysis | |
650 | 4 | |a Systematic Review | |
650 | 4 | |a COVID-19 | |
650 | 4 | |a SARS-CoV-2 | |
650 | 4 | |a animals | |
650 | 4 | |a prevalence | |
650 | 4 | |a transmission | |
650 | 4 | |a zoonotic | |
700 | 1 | |a García-Barco, Alejandra |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Jimenez-Diaz, S Daniela |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Bonilla-Aldana, Jorge Luis |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Cardona-Trujillo, Maria C |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Muñoz-Lara, Fausto |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Zambrano, Lysien I |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Salas-Matta, Luis A |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Rodriguez-Morales, Alfonso J |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t The veterinary quarterly |d 1979 |g 41(2021), 1 vom: 31. Dez., Seite 250-267 |w (DE-627)NLM012965510 |x 1875-5941 |7 nnns |
773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:41 |g year:2021 |g number:1 |g day:31 |g month:12 |g pages:250-267 |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01652176.2021.1970280 |3 Volltext |
912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
912 | |a GBV_NLM | ||
951 | |a AR | ||
952 | |d 41 |j 2021 |e 1 |b 31 |c 12 |h 250-267 |