Evaluation of focus and deep learning methods for automated image grading and factors influencing image quality in adaptive optics ophthalmoscopy
© 2021. The Author(s)..
Adaptive optics flood illumination ophthalmoscopy (AO-FIO) is an established imaging tool in the investigation of retinal diseases. However, the clinical interpretation of AO-FIO images can be challenging due to varied image quality. Therefore, image quality assessment is essential before interpretation. An image assessment tool will also assist further work on improving the image quality, either during acquisition or post processing. In this paper, we describe, validate and compare two automated image quality assessment methods; the energy of Laplacian focus operator (LAPE; not commonly used but easily implemented) and convolutional neural network (CNN; effective but more complex approach). We also evaluate the effects of subject age, axial length, refractive error, fixation stability, disease status and retinal location on AO-FIO image quality. Based on analysis of 10,250 images of 50 × 50 μm size, at 41 retinal locations, from 50 subjects we demonstrate that CNN slightly outperforms LAPE in image quality assessment. CNN achieves accuracy of 89%, whereas LAPE metric achieves 73% and 80% (for a linear regression and random forest multiclass classifier methods, respectively) compared to ground truth. Furthermore, the retinal location, age and disease are factors that can influence the likelihood of poor image quality.
| Medienart: |
E-Artikel |
|---|
| Erscheinungsjahr: |
2021 |
|---|---|
| Erschienen: |
2021 |
| Enthalten in: |
Zur Gesamtaufnahme - volume:11 |
|---|---|
| Enthalten in: |
Scientific reports - 11(2021), 1 vom: 17. Aug., Seite 16641 |
| Sprache: |
Englisch |
|---|
| Beteiligte Personen: |
Sampson, Danuta M [VerfasserIn] |
|---|
| Links: |
|---|
| Themen: |
|---|
| Anmerkungen: |
Date Completed 15.10.2021 Date Revised 15.10.2021 published: Electronic Citation Status PubMed-not-MEDLINE |
|---|
| doi: |
10.1038/s41598-021-96068-2 |
|---|
| funding: |
|
|---|---|
| Förderinstitution / Projekttitel: |
|
| PPN (Katalog-ID): |
NLM329484362 |
|---|
| LEADER | 01000caa a22002652 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | NLM329484362 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20231226203441.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 231225s2021 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1038/s41598-021-96068-2 |2 doi | |
| 028 | 5 | 2 | |a pubmed24n1098.xml |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)NLM329484362 | ||
| 035 | |a (NLM)34404857 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Sampson, Danuta M |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Evaluation of focus and deep learning methods for automated image grading and factors influencing image quality in adaptive optics ophthalmoscopy |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2021 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a ƒaComputermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a ƒa Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 500 | |a Date Completed 15.10.2021 | ||
| 500 | |a Date Revised 15.10.2021 | ||
| 500 | |a published: Electronic | ||
| 500 | |a Citation Status PubMed-not-MEDLINE | ||
| 520 | |a © 2021. The Author(s). | ||
| 520 | |a Adaptive optics flood illumination ophthalmoscopy (AO-FIO) is an established imaging tool in the investigation of retinal diseases. However, the clinical interpretation of AO-FIO images can be challenging due to varied image quality. Therefore, image quality assessment is essential before interpretation. An image assessment tool will also assist further work on improving the image quality, either during acquisition or post processing. In this paper, we describe, validate and compare two automated image quality assessment methods; the energy of Laplacian focus operator (LAPE; not commonly used but easily implemented) and convolutional neural network (CNN; effective but more complex approach). We also evaluate the effects of subject age, axial length, refractive error, fixation stability, disease status and retinal location on AO-FIO image quality. Based on analysis of 10,250 images of 50 × 50 μm size, at 41 retinal locations, from 50 subjects we demonstrate that CNN slightly outperforms LAPE in image quality assessment. CNN achieves accuracy of 89%, whereas LAPE metric achieves 73% and 80% (for a linear regression and random forest multiclass classifier methods, respectively) compared to ground truth. Furthermore, the retinal location, age and disease are factors that can influence the likelihood of poor image quality | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Journal Article | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Alonso-Caneiro, David |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Chew, Avenell L |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a La, Jonathan |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Roshandel, Danial |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Wang, Yufei |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Khan, Jane C |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Chelva, Enid |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Stevenson, Paul G |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Chen, Fred K |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Scientific reports |d 2011 |g 11(2021), 1 vom: 17. Aug., Seite 16641 |w (DE-627)NLM215703936 |x 2045-2322 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:11 |g year:2021 |g number:1 |g day:17 |g month:08 |g pages:16641 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-96068-2 |3 Volltext |
| 912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_NLM | ||
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| 952 | |d 11 |j 2021 |e 1 |b 17 |c 08 |h 16641 | ||