Does the bonding effectiveness of a fiber post/resin composite benefit from mechanical or chemical treatment? Seven methods for saliva-contaminated surfaces
PURPOSE: This study examined four cleaning methods and three chemical treatments for artificial saliva-contaminated fiber posts in terms of bonding durability to resin composite core materials.
METHODS: Non-contaminated fiber posts (Tokuyama FR Post, Tokuyama Dental) and those contaminated (GC Fiber Post, GC) with artificial saliva (Saliveht Aerosol, Teijin Pharma) were used. Washing and drying (WD), alcohol cleaning (AlC), H3PO4 etching (P/WD), alumina blasting (B/D) for decontamination and silanization (Clearfil Ceramic Primer Plus, Kuraray Noritake Dental, Si), resin priming (HC Primer, Shofu, MMA), and bonding resin application (Clearfil Universal Bond Quick, Kuraray Noritake Dental, BR) for chemical treatment were performed. The treated fiber post was planted inside a cylindrical tube and filled with resin composite (DC Core Automix ONE, Kuraray Noritake Dental). The specimen was sectioned, and a push-out test was performed after 24 h, 1 month, and 3 months. The fracture surface was observed using a scanning electron microscope (SEM).
RESULTS: Adhesion between the non-contaminated fiber post and resin composite did not improve by silanization and decreased by alumina blasting. SEM observations revealed a fractured glass fiber by alumina blasting. Saliva contamination decreased the bond strength between the fiber post and resin composite; however, recovery was achieved by WD, Alc, P/WD, and B/D. Compared to Si, BR (P = 0.009) was effective in restraining the long-term durability of bonding, whereas MMA (P = 0.99) was not.
CONCLUSION: The application of bonding resin after alcohol cleaning is the most convenient and effective clinical procedure for fiber post surface treatment.
| Medienart: |
E-Artikel |
|---|
| Erscheinungsjahr: |
2022 |
|---|---|
| Erschienen: |
2022 |
| Enthalten in: |
Zur Gesamtaufnahme - volume:66 |
|---|---|
| Enthalten in: |
Journal of prosthodontic research - 66(2022), 2 vom: 27. Apr., Seite 288-295 |
| Sprache: |
Englisch |
|---|
| Beteiligte Personen: |
Imai, Dai [VerfasserIn] |
|---|
| Links: |
|---|
| Themen: |
Adhesion inhibitor |
|---|
| Anmerkungen: |
Date Completed 28.04.2022 Date Revised 28.04.2022 published: Print-Electronic Citation Status MEDLINE |
|---|
| doi: |
10.2186/jpr.JPR_D_21_00015 |
|---|
| funding: |
|
|---|---|
| Förderinstitution / Projekttitel: |
|
| PPN (Katalog-ID): |
NLM328934658 |
|---|
| LEADER | 01000naa a22002652 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | NLM328934658 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20231225204018.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 231225s2022 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.2186/jpr.JPR_D_21_00015 |2 doi | |
| 028 | 5 | 2 | |a pubmed24n1096.xml |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)NLM328934658 | ||
| 035 | |a (NLM)34349083 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Imai, Dai |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Does the bonding effectiveness of a fiber post/resin composite benefit from mechanical or chemical treatment? Seven methods for saliva-contaminated surfaces |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2022 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a ƒaComputermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a ƒa Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 500 | |a Date Completed 28.04.2022 | ||
| 500 | |a Date Revised 28.04.2022 | ||
| 500 | |a published: Print-Electronic | ||
| 500 | |a Citation Status MEDLINE | ||
| 520 | |a PURPOSE: This study examined four cleaning methods and three chemical treatments for artificial saliva-contaminated fiber posts in terms of bonding durability to resin composite core materials | ||
| 520 | |a METHODS: Non-contaminated fiber posts (Tokuyama FR Post, Tokuyama Dental) and those contaminated (GC Fiber Post, GC) with artificial saliva (Saliveht Aerosol, Teijin Pharma) were used. Washing and drying (WD), alcohol cleaning (AlC), H3PO4 etching (P/WD), alumina blasting (B/D) for decontamination and silanization (Clearfil Ceramic Primer Plus, Kuraray Noritake Dental, Si), resin priming (HC Primer, Shofu, MMA), and bonding resin application (Clearfil Universal Bond Quick, Kuraray Noritake Dental, BR) for chemical treatment were performed. The treated fiber post was planted inside a cylindrical tube and filled with resin composite (DC Core Automix ONE, Kuraray Noritake Dental). The specimen was sectioned, and a push-out test was performed after 24 h, 1 month, and 3 months. The fracture surface was observed using a scanning electron microscope (SEM) | ||
| 520 | |a RESULTS: Adhesion between the non-contaminated fiber post and resin composite did not improve by silanization and decreased by alumina blasting. SEM observations revealed a fractured glass fiber by alumina blasting. Saliva contamination decreased the bond strength between the fiber post and resin composite; however, recovery was achieved by WD, Alc, P/WD, and B/D. Compared to Si, BR (P = 0.009) was effective in restraining the long-term durability of bonding, whereas MMA (P = 0.99) was not | ||
| 520 | |a CONCLUSION: The application of bonding resin after alcohol cleaning is the most convenient and effective clinical procedure for fiber post surface treatment | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Journal Article | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Adhesion inhibitor | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Adhesive dentistry | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Bonding durability | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Push-out test | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Resin core buildup | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Composite Resins |2 NLM | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Resin Cements |2 NLM | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Saliva, Artificial |2 NLM | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Aluminum Oxide |2 NLM | |
| 650 | 7 | |a LMI26O6933 |2 NLM | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Mine, Atsushi |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Ezaki, Ryoma |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Nakatani, Hayaki |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Matsumoto, Mariko |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Hagino, Ryosuke |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Yumitate, Masahiro |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Yamanaka, Azusa |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Ban, Shintaro |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Miura, Jiro |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Meerbeek, Bart Van |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Higashi, Mami |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Yatani, Hirofumi |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Journal of prosthodontic research |d 2009 |g 66(2022), 2 vom: 27. Apr., Seite 288-295 |w (DE-627)NLM187382581 |x 2212-4632 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:66 |g year:2022 |g number:2 |g day:27 |g month:04 |g pages:288-295 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u http://dx.doi.org/10.2186/jpr.JPR_D_21_00015 |3 Volltext |
| 912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_NLM | ||
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| 952 | |d 66 |j 2022 |e 2 |b 27 |c 04 |h 288-295 | ||