Recommendations for the Successful Implementation of Upper Limb Prosthetic Technology
Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved..
Despite the numerous prosthetic hand designs that are commercially available, people with upper limb loss still frequently report dissatisfaction and abandonment. Over the past decade there have been numerous advances in prosthetic design, control, sensation, and device attachment. Each offers the potential to enhance function and satisfaction, but most come at high costs and involve surgical risks. Here, we discuss potential barriers and solutions to promote the widespread use of novel prosthetic technology. With appropriate reimbursement, multidisciplinary care teams, device-specific rehabilitation, and patient and clinician education, such technology has the potential to revolutionize the field and improve patient outcomes.
| Medienart: |
E-Artikel |
|---|
| Erscheinungsjahr: |
2021 |
|---|---|
| Erschienen: |
2021 |
| Enthalten in: |
Zur Gesamtaufnahme - volume:37 |
|---|---|
| Enthalten in: |
Hand clinics - 37(2021), 3 vom: 13. Aug., Seite 457-466 |
| Sprache: |
Englisch |
|---|
| Beteiligte Personen: |
Gates, Deanna H [VerfasserIn] |
|---|
| Links: |
|---|
| Themen: |
Amputation |
|---|
| Anmerkungen: |
Date Completed 22.11.2021 Date Revised 22.11.2021 published: Print Citation Status MEDLINE |
|---|
| doi: |
10.1016/j.hcl.2021.05.007 |
|---|
| funding: |
|
|---|---|
| Förderinstitution / Projekttitel: |
|
| PPN (Katalog-ID): |
NLM327990945 |
|---|
| LEADER | 01000naa a22002652 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | NLM327990945 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20231225202017.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 231225s2021 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1016/j.hcl.2021.05.007 |2 doi | |
| 028 | 5 | 2 | |a pubmed24n1093.xml |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)NLM327990945 | ||
| 035 | |a (NLM)34253318 | ||
| 035 | |a (PII)S0749-0712(21)01302-0 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Gates, Deanna H |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Recommendations for the Successful Implementation of Upper Limb Prosthetic Technology |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2021 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a ƒaComputermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a ƒa Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 500 | |a Date Completed 22.11.2021 | ||
| 500 | |a Date Revised 22.11.2021 | ||
| 500 | |a published: Print | ||
| 500 | |a Citation Status MEDLINE | ||
| 520 | |a Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. | ||
| 520 | |a Despite the numerous prosthetic hand designs that are commercially available, people with upper limb loss still frequently report dissatisfaction and abandonment. Over the past decade there have been numerous advances in prosthetic design, control, sensation, and device attachment. Each offers the potential to enhance function and satisfaction, but most come at high costs and involve surgical risks. Here, we discuss potential barriers and solutions to promote the widespread use of novel prosthetic technology. With appropriate reimbursement, multidisciplinary care teams, device-specific rehabilitation, and patient and clinician education, such technology has the potential to revolutionize the field and improve patient outcomes | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Journal Article | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Review | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Amputation | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Limb loss | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Outcomes | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Prosthetic control | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Upper limb | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Engdahl, Susannah M |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Davis, Alicia |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Hand clinics |d 1993 |g 37(2021), 3 vom: 13. Aug., Seite 457-466 |w (DE-627)NLM013005839 |x 1558-1969 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:37 |g year:2021 |g number:3 |g day:13 |g month:08 |g pages:457-466 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.hcl.2021.05.007 |3 Volltext |
| 912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_NLM | ||
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| 952 | |d 37 |j 2021 |e 3 |b 13 |c 08 |h 457-466 | ||