Residents and patients benefit from surgical simulation on a live porcine model, could we consider it as ethical?
Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved..
INTRODUCTION: The objective was to evaluate, by self-questionnaire, the feeling of participants in surgical training sessions on a live porcine model.
METHODS: A computerized questionnaire (GoogleForm ©) was sent to the members of the French Association of Urologists-in-Training (AFUF) (fellows and residents). Only questionnaires from Urologists-in-training who had participated in surgical training sessions were included. The sessions consisted of performing surgeries such as laparoscopic nephrectomies or laparoscopic cystectomies.
RESULTS: Overall, 198 met the inclusion criteria. A total of 36.4% (72/198) of the participants were fellows and 63.6% (126/198) were residents. According to the participants, the main interest of sessions was to be able to train for emergency situations. A total of 79.8% (158/198) of the participants wanted surgical simulation to become compulsory. To their opinion, the main advantage of surgical simulation on a live porcine model was: technical progress in 87.4% (173/198) of cases. A total of 13.1% (26/198) of the participants found it was unethical to perform the first technical procedures on live animal models. A total of 65.7% (130/198) of the participants considered that there is currently no system of substitution.
CONCLUSION: For the participants, surgical training on a live porcine model allows technical progress while training for serious emergency situations. Surgeons and patients could benefit from this risk-free mock surgical scenario.
LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3.
| Medienart: |
E-Artikel |
|---|
| Erscheinungsjahr: |
2021 |
|---|---|
| Erschienen: |
2021 |
| Enthalten in: |
Zur Gesamtaufnahme - volume:31 |
|---|---|
| Enthalten in: |
Progres en urologie : journal de l'Association francaise d'urologie et de la Societe francaise d'urologie - 31(2021), 10 vom: 19. Sept., Seite 618-626 |
| Sprache: |
Englisch |
|---|
| Beteiligte Personen: |
Prudhomme, T [VerfasserIn] |
|---|
| Links: |
|---|
| Themen: |
Éthique |
|---|
| Anmerkungen: |
Date Completed 10.12.2021 Date Revised 14.12.2021 published: Print-Electronic Citation Status MEDLINE |
|---|
| doi: |
10.1016/j.purol.2021.01.008 |
|---|
| funding: |
|
|---|---|
| Förderinstitution / Projekttitel: |
|
| PPN (Katalog-ID): |
NLM327055596 |
|---|
| LEADER | 01000naa a22002652 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | NLM327055596 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20231225195929.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 231225s2021 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1016/j.purol.2021.01.008 |2 doi | |
| 028 | 5 | 2 | |a pubmed24n1090.xml |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)NLM327055596 | ||
| 035 | |a (NLM)34158220 | ||
| 035 | |a (PII)S1166-7087(21)00021-X | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Prudhomme, T |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Residents and patients benefit from surgical simulation on a live porcine model, could we consider it as ethical? |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2021 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a ƒaComputermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a ƒa Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 500 | |a Date Completed 10.12.2021 | ||
| 500 | |a Date Revised 14.12.2021 | ||
| 500 | |a published: Print-Electronic | ||
| 500 | |a Citation Status MEDLINE | ||
| 520 | |a Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved. | ||
| 520 | |a INTRODUCTION: The objective was to evaluate, by self-questionnaire, the feeling of participants in surgical training sessions on a live porcine model | ||
| 520 | |a METHODS: A computerized questionnaire (GoogleForm ©) was sent to the members of the French Association of Urologists-in-Training (AFUF) (fellows and residents). Only questionnaires from Urologists-in-training who had participated in surgical training sessions were included. The sessions consisted of performing surgeries such as laparoscopic nephrectomies or laparoscopic cystectomies | ||
| 520 | |a RESULTS: Overall, 198 met the inclusion criteria. A total of 36.4% (72/198) of the participants were fellows and 63.6% (126/198) were residents. According to the participants, the main interest of sessions was to be able to train for emergency situations. A total of 79.8% (158/198) of the participants wanted surgical simulation to become compulsory. To their opinion, the main advantage of surgical simulation on a live porcine model was: technical progress in 87.4% (173/198) of cases. A total of 13.1% (26/198) of the participants found it was unethical to perform the first technical procedures on live animal models. A total of 65.7% (130/198) of the participants considered that there is currently no system of substitution | ||
| 520 | |a CONCLUSION: For the participants, surgical training on a live porcine model allows technical progress while training for serious emergency situations. Surgeons and patients could benefit from this risk-free mock surgical scenario | ||
| 520 | |a LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3 | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Journal Article | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Ethical issue | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Internes | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Live porcine model | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Modèle vivant porcin | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Residents | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Simulation chirurgicale | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Surgical simulation | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Urologists-in-training | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Urologues en formation | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Éthique | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Matillon, X |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Dengu, F |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a de Mazancourt, E |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Pinar, U |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Gondran-Tellier, B |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Freton, L |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Vallée, M |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Dominique, I |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Felber, M |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Khene, Z-E |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Fortier, E |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Lannes, F |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Michiels, C |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Grevez, T |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Szabla, N |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Bardet, F |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Kaulanjan, K |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Pradère, B |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Deschamps, J-Y |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Branchereau, J |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Progres en urologie : journal de l'Association francaise d'urologie et de la Societe francaise d'urologie |d 1997 |g 31(2021), 10 vom: 19. Sept., Seite 618-626 |w (DE-627)NLM012649481 |x 1166-7087 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:31 |g year:2021 |g number:10 |g day:19 |g month:09 |g pages:618-626 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.purol.2021.01.008 |3 Volltext |
| 912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_NLM | ||
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| 952 | |d 31 |j 2021 |e 10 |b 19 |c 09 |h 618-626 | ||