How to deal with the consent of adults with cognitive impairment involved in European geriatric living labs?
BACKGROUND: Living labs are realistic environments designed to create links between technology developers and end-users (i.e. mostly older adults). Research in LLH (Living labs in health) covers a wide range of studies from non-interventional studies to CT (clinical trials) and should involve patients with neurocognitive disorders. However, the ethical issues raised by the design, development, and implementation of research and development projects in LLH have been the subject of only little interest thus far.
OBJECTIVE: Our aim was to determine a pragmatic, ethical and regulatory correct approach to seek the informed consent of patients with neurocognitive disorders according to the different types of studies carried out in European LLH, with a focus on the French context.
METHODS: A narrative review of regulatory texts and clinical articles was conducted, and a pragmatic procedure to determine the decision-making capacity of older adults in LLH was proposed.
RESULTS: Individuals must be adequately informed and freely agree to participate in CT. The capacity to consent should be assessed in CT including cognitively impaired older adults. We propose the following steps: first to assess for delirium using the 4 'A's Test (4AT) or the 3-min Diagnostic interview for Confusion Assessment Method (3D-CAM), second to search for medical history of major neurocognitive disorder, and third to assess the decision capacity using the University of California, San Diego Brief Assessment of Capacity to Consent (UBACC).
CONCLUSIONS: Including individuals with neurocognitive disorders in research implies using an efficient and pragmatic strategy to inform participants and obtain their consent. The tool we offer here may be useful in the routine operation of LLH but can also be extended to all CT with this population.
| Medienart: |
E-Artikel |
|---|
| Erscheinungsjahr: |
2021 |
|---|---|
| Erschienen: |
2021 |
| Enthalten in: |
Zur Gesamtaufnahme - volume:16 |
|---|---|
| Enthalten in: |
Philosophy, ethics, and humanities in medicine : PEHM - 16(2021), 1 vom: 16. Juni, Seite 3 |
| Sprache: |
Englisch |
|---|
| Beteiligte Personen: |
Sacco, Guillaume [VerfasserIn] |
|---|
| Links: |
|---|
| Themen: |
Consent |
|---|
| Anmerkungen: |
Date Completed 28.10.2021 Date Revised 07.11.2023 published: Electronic Citation Status MEDLINE |
|---|
| doi: |
10.1186/s13010-021-00101-1 |
|---|
| funding: |
|
|---|---|
| Förderinstitution / Projekttitel: |
|
| PPN (Katalog-ID): |
NLM326783911 |
|---|
| LEADER | 01000naa a22002652 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | NLM326783911 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20231225195338.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 231225s2021 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1186/s13010-021-00101-1 |2 doi | |
| 028 | 5 | 2 | |a pubmed24n1089.xml |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)NLM326783911 | ||
| 035 | |a (NLM)34130730 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Sacco, Guillaume |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a How to deal with the consent of adults with cognitive impairment involved in European geriatric living labs? |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2021 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a ƒaComputermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a ƒa Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 500 | |a Date Completed 28.10.2021 | ||
| 500 | |a Date Revised 07.11.2023 | ||
| 500 | |a published: Electronic | ||
| 500 | |a Citation Status MEDLINE | ||
| 520 | |a BACKGROUND: Living labs are realistic environments designed to create links between technology developers and end-users (i.e. mostly older adults). Research in LLH (Living labs in health) covers a wide range of studies from non-interventional studies to CT (clinical trials) and should involve patients with neurocognitive disorders. However, the ethical issues raised by the design, development, and implementation of research and development projects in LLH have been the subject of only little interest thus far | ||
| 520 | |a OBJECTIVE: Our aim was to determine a pragmatic, ethical and regulatory correct approach to seek the informed consent of patients with neurocognitive disorders according to the different types of studies carried out in European LLH, with a focus on the French context | ||
| 520 | |a METHODS: A narrative review of regulatory texts and clinical articles was conducted, and a pragmatic procedure to determine the decision-making capacity of older adults in LLH was proposed | ||
| 520 | |a RESULTS: Individuals must be adequately informed and freely agree to participate in CT. The capacity to consent should be assessed in CT including cognitively impaired older adults. We propose the following steps: first to assess for delirium using the 4 'A's Test (4AT) or the 3-min Diagnostic interview for Confusion Assessment Method (3D-CAM), second to search for medical history of major neurocognitive disorder, and third to assess the decision capacity using the University of California, San Diego Brief Assessment of Capacity to Consent (UBACC) | ||
| 520 | |a CONCLUSIONS: Including individuals with neurocognitive disorders in research implies using an efficient and pragmatic strategy to inform participants and obtain their consent. The tool we offer here may be useful in the routine operation of LLH but can also be extended to all CT with this population | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Journal Article | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Review | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Consent | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Ethics | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Geriatrics | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Living lab | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Older adults | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Noublanche, Frédéric |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Blazek, Frédéric |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Hue, Catherine |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Carballido, Loïc |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Asfar, Marine |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Allain, Philippe |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Annweiler, Cédric |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Philosophy, ethics, and humanities in medicine : PEHM |d 2006 |g 16(2021), 1 vom: 16. Juni, Seite 3 |w (DE-627)NLM163368694 |x 1747-5341 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:16 |g year:2021 |g number:1 |g day:16 |g month:06 |g pages:3 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13010-021-00101-1 |3 Volltext |
| 912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_NLM | ||
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| 952 | |d 16 |j 2021 |e 1 |b 16 |c 06 |h 3 | ||