Interferon therapy in patients with SARS, MERS, and COVID-19 : A systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical studies
Copyright © 2021 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved..
Concern regarding coronavirus (CoV) outbreaks has stayed relevant to global health in the last decades. Emerging COVID-19 infection, caused by the novel SARS-CoV2, is now a pandemic, bringing a substantial burden to human health. Interferon (IFN), combined with other antivirals and various treatments, has been used to treat and prevent MERS-CoV, SARS-CoV, and SARS-CoV2 infections. We aimed to assess the clinical efficacy of IFN-based treatments and combinational therapy with antivirals, corticosteroids, traditional medicine, and other treatments. Major healthcare databases and grey literature were investigated. A three-stage screening was utilized, and included studies were checked against the protocol eligibility criteria. Risk of bias assessment and data extraction were performed, followed by narrative data synthesis. Fifty-five distinct studies of SARS-CoV2, MERS-CoV, and SARS-CoV were spotted. Our narrative synthesis showed a possible benefit in the use of IFN. A good quality cohort showed lower CRP levels in Arbidol (ARB) + IFN group vs. IFN only group. Another study reported a significantly shorter chest X-ray (CXR) resolution in IFN-Alfacon-1 + corticosteroid group compared with the corticosteroid only group in SARS-CoV patients. In a COVID-19 trial, total adverse drug events (ADEs) were much lower in the Favipiravir (FPV) + IFN-α group compared with the LPV/RTV arm (P = 0.001). Also, nausea in patients receiving FPV + IFN-α regimen was significantly lower (P = 0.03). Quantitative analysis of mortality did not show a conclusive effect for IFN/RBV treatment in six moderately heterogeneous MERS-CoV studies (log OR = -0.05, 95% CI: (-0.71,0.62), I2 = 44.71%). A meta-analysis of three COVID-19 studies did not show a conclusive nor meaningful relation between receiving IFN and COVID-19 severity (log OR = -0.44, 95% CI: (-1.13,0.25), I2 = 31.42%). A lack of high-quality cohorts and controlled trials was observed. Evidence suggests the potential efficacy of several combination IFN therapies such as lower ADEs, quicker resolution of CXR, or a decrease in inflammatory cytokines; Still, these options must possibly be further explored before being recommended in public guidelines. For all major CoVs, our results may indicate a lack of a definitive effect of IFN treatment on mortality. We recommend such therapeutics be administered with extreme caution until further investigation uncovers high-quality evidence in favor of IFN or combination therapy with IFN.
Medienart: |
E-Artikel |
---|
Erscheinungsjahr: |
2021 |
---|---|
Erschienen: |
2021 |
Enthalten in: |
Zur Gesamtaufnahme - volume:906 |
---|---|
Enthalten in: |
European journal of pharmacology - 906(2021) vom: 05. Sept., Seite 174248 |
Sprache: |
Englisch |
---|
Beteiligte Personen: |
Saleki, Kiarash [VerfasserIn] |
---|
Links: |
---|
Anmerkungen: |
Date Completed 30.07.2021 Date Revised 07.12.2022 published: Print-Electronic Citation Status MEDLINE |
---|
doi: |
10.1016/j.ejphar.2021.174248 |
---|
funding: |
|
---|---|
Förderinstitution / Projekttitel: |
|
PPN (Katalog-ID): |
NLM326739467 |
---|
LEADER | 01000naa a22002652 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | NLM326739467 | ||
003 | DE-627 | ||
005 | 20231225195240.0 | ||
007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
008 | 231225s2021 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
024 | 7 | |a 10.1016/j.ejphar.2021.174248 |2 doi | |
028 | 5 | 2 | |a pubmed24n1089.xml |
035 | |a (DE-627)NLM326739467 | ||
035 | |a (NLM)34126092 | ||
035 | |a (PII)S0014-2999(21)00401-5 | ||
040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
041 | |a eng | ||
100 | 1 | |a Saleki, Kiarash |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 0 | |a Interferon therapy in patients with SARS, MERS, and COVID-19 |b A systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical studies |
264 | 1 | |c 2021 | |
336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |a ƒaComputermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |a ƒa Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
500 | |a Date Completed 30.07.2021 | ||
500 | |a Date Revised 07.12.2022 | ||
500 | |a published: Print-Electronic | ||
500 | |a Citation Status MEDLINE | ||
520 | |a Copyright © 2021 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. | ||
520 | |a Concern regarding coronavirus (CoV) outbreaks has stayed relevant to global health in the last decades. Emerging COVID-19 infection, caused by the novel SARS-CoV2, is now a pandemic, bringing a substantial burden to human health. Interferon (IFN), combined with other antivirals and various treatments, has been used to treat and prevent MERS-CoV, SARS-CoV, and SARS-CoV2 infections. We aimed to assess the clinical efficacy of IFN-based treatments and combinational therapy with antivirals, corticosteroids, traditional medicine, and other treatments. Major healthcare databases and grey literature were investigated. A three-stage screening was utilized, and included studies were checked against the protocol eligibility criteria. Risk of bias assessment and data extraction were performed, followed by narrative data synthesis. Fifty-five distinct studies of SARS-CoV2, MERS-CoV, and SARS-CoV were spotted. Our narrative synthesis showed a possible benefit in the use of IFN. A good quality cohort showed lower CRP levels in Arbidol (ARB) + IFN group vs. IFN only group. Another study reported a significantly shorter chest X-ray (CXR) resolution in IFN-Alfacon-1 + corticosteroid group compared with the corticosteroid only group in SARS-CoV patients. In a COVID-19 trial, total adverse drug events (ADEs) were much lower in the Favipiravir (FPV) + IFN-α group compared with the LPV/RTV arm (P = 0.001). Also, nausea in patients receiving FPV + IFN-α regimen was significantly lower (P = 0.03). Quantitative analysis of mortality did not show a conclusive effect for IFN/RBV treatment in six moderately heterogeneous MERS-CoV studies (log OR = -0.05, 95% CI: (-0.71,0.62), I2 = 44.71%). A meta-analysis of three COVID-19 studies did not show a conclusive nor meaningful relation between receiving IFN and COVID-19 severity (log OR = -0.44, 95% CI: (-1.13,0.25), I2 = 31.42%). A lack of high-quality cohorts and controlled trials was observed. Evidence suggests the potential efficacy of several combination IFN therapies such as lower ADEs, quicker resolution of CXR, or a decrease in inflammatory cytokines; Still, these options must possibly be further explored before being recommended in public guidelines. For all major CoVs, our results may indicate a lack of a definitive effect of IFN treatment on mortality. We recommend such therapeutics be administered with extreme caution until further investigation uncovers high-quality evidence in favor of IFN or combination therapy with IFN | ||
650 | 4 | |a Journal Article | |
650 | 4 | |a Meta-Analysis | |
650 | 4 | |a Systematic Review | |
650 | 4 | |a COVID-19 | |
650 | 4 | |a IFN | |
650 | 4 | |a Interferon | |
650 | 4 | |a MERS-CoV | |
650 | 4 | |a Middle-east respiratory syndrome | |
650 | 4 | |a SARS-CoV | |
650 | 4 | |a SARS-CoV2 | |
650 | 4 | |a Severe acute respiratory syndrome | |
650 | 7 | |a Antiviral Agents |2 NLM | |
650 | 7 | |a Interferons |2 NLM | |
650 | 7 | |a 9008-11-1 |2 NLM | |
700 | 1 | |a Yaribash, Shakila |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Banazadeh, Mohammad |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Hajihosseinlou, Ehsan |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Gouravani, Mahdi |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Saghazadeh, Amene |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Rezaei, Nima |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t European journal of pharmacology |d 1967 |g 906(2021) vom: 05. Sept., Seite 174248 |w (DE-627)NLM000029769 |x 1879-0712 |7 nnns |
773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:906 |g year:2021 |g day:05 |g month:09 |g pages:174248 |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejphar.2021.174248 |3 Volltext |
912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
912 | |a GBV_NLM | ||
951 | |a AR | ||
952 | |d 906 |j 2021 |b 05 |c 09 |h 174248 |