Combination of (interferon beta-1b, lopinavir/ritonavir and ribavirin) versus favipiravir in hospitalized patients with non-critical COVID-19 : A cohort study
OBJECTIVES: Our study aims at comparing the efficacy and safety of IFN-based therapy (lopinavir/ritonavir, ribavirin, and interferon β-1b) vs. favipiravir (FPV) in a cohort of hospitalized patients with non-critical COVID-19.
METHODS: Single center observational study comparing IFN-based therapy (interferon β-1b, ribavirin, and lopinavir/ritonavir) vs. FPV in non-critical hospitalized COVID-19 patients. Allocation to either treatment group was non-random but based on changes to national treatment protocols rather than physicians' selection (quasi-experimental). We examined the association between IFN-based therapy and 28-day mortality using Cox regression model with treatment as a time-dependent covariate.
RESULTS: The study cohort included 222 patients, of whom 68 (28%) received IFN-based therapy. Antiviral therapy was started at a median of 5 days (3-6 days) from symptoms onset in the IFN group vs. 6 days (4-7 days) for the FPV group, P <0.0001. IFN-based therapy was associated with a lower 28-day mortality as compared to FPV (6 (9%) vs. 18 (12%)), adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] (95% Cl) = 0.27 (0.08-0.88)). No difference in hospitalization duration between the 2 groups, 9 (7-14) days vs. 9 (7-13) days, P = 0.732 was found. IFN treated group required less use of systemic corticosteroids (57%) as compared to FPV (77%), P = 0.005 after adjusting for disease severity and other confounders. Patients in the IFN treated group were more likely to have nausea and diarrhea as compared to FPV group (13%) vs. (3%), P = 0.013 and (18%) vs. (3%), P<0.0001, respectively.
CONCLUSION: Early IFN-based triple therapy was associated with lower 28-days mortality as compared to FPV.
Medienart: |
E-Artikel |
---|
Erscheinungsjahr: |
2021 |
---|---|
Erschienen: |
2021 |
Enthalten in: |
Zur Gesamtaufnahme - volume:16 |
---|---|
Enthalten in: |
PloS one - 16(2021), 6 vom: 10., Seite e0252984 |
Sprache: |
Englisch |
---|
Beteiligte Personen: |
A Malhani, Areej [VerfasserIn] |
---|
Links: |
---|
Themen: |
145155-23-3 |
---|
Anmerkungen: |
Date Completed 23.06.2021 Date Revised 07.12.2022 published: Electronic-eCollection Citation Status MEDLINE |
---|
doi: |
10.1371/journal.pone.0252984 |
---|
funding: |
|
---|---|
Förderinstitution / Projekttitel: |
|
PPN (Katalog-ID): |
NLM326591702 |
---|
LEADER | 01000naa a22002652 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | NLM326591702 | ||
003 | DE-627 | ||
005 | 20231225194926.0 | ||
007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
008 | 231225s2021 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
024 | 7 | |a 10.1371/journal.pone.0252984 |2 doi | |
028 | 5 | 2 | |a pubmed24n1088.xml |
035 | |a (DE-627)NLM326591702 | ||
035 | |a (NLM)34111191 | ||
040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
041 | |a eng | ||
100 | 1 | |a A Malhani, Areej |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 0 | |a Combination of (interferon beta-1b, lopinavir/ritonavir and ribavirin) versus favipiravir in hospitalized patients with non-critical COVID-19 |b A cohort study |
264 | 1 | |c 2021 | |
336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |a ƒaComputermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |a ƒa Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
500 | |a Date Completed 23.06.2021 | ||
500 | |a Date Revised 07.12.2022 | ||
500 | |a published: Electronic-eCollection | ||
500 | |a Citation Status MEDLINE | ||
520 | |a OBJECTIVES: Our study aims at comparing the efficacy and safety of IFN-based therapy (lopinavir/ritonavir, ribavirin, and interferon β-1b) vs. favipiravir (FPV) in a cohort of hospitalized patients with non-critical COVID-19 | ||
520 | |a METHODS: Single center observational study comparing IFN-based therapy (interferon β-1b, ribavirin, and lopinavir/ritonavir) vs. FPV in non-critical hospitalized COVID-19 patients. Allocation to either treatment group was non-random but based on changes to national treatment protocols rather than physicians' selection (quasi-experimental). We examined the association between IFN-based therapy and 28-day mortality using Cox regression model with treatment as a time-dependent covariate | ||
520 | |a RESULTS: The study cohort included 222 patients, of whom 68 (28%) received IFN-based therapy. Antiviral therapy was started at a median of 5 days (3-6 days) from symptoms onset in the IFN group vs. 6 days (4-7 days) for the FPV group, P <0.0001. IFN-based therapy was associated with a lower 28-day mortality as compared to FPV (6 (9%) vs. 18 (12%)), adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] (95% Cl) = 0.27 (0.08-0.88)). No difference in hospitalization duration between the 2 groups, 9 (7-14) days vs. 9 (7-13) days, P = 0.732 was found. IFN treated group required less use of systemic corticosteroids (57%) as compared to FPV (77%), P = 0.005 after adjusting for disease severity and other confounders. Patients in the IFN treated group were more likely to have nausea and diarrhea as compared to FPV group (13%) vs. (3%), P = 0.013 and (18%) vs. (3%), P<0.0001, respectively | ||
520 | |a CONCLUSION: Early IFN-based triple therapy was associated with lower 28-days mortality as compared to FPV | ||
650 | 4 | |a Comparative Study | |
650 | 4 | |a Journal Article | |
650 | 7 | |a Amides |2 NLM | |
650 | 7 | |a Antiviral Agents |2 NLM | |
650 | 7 | |a Pyrazines |2 NLM | |
650 | 7 | |a Interferon beta-1b |2 NLM | |
650 | 7 | |a 145155-23-3 |2 NLM | |
650 | 7 | |a Lopinavir |2 NLM | |
650 | 7 | |a 2494G1JF75 |2 NLM | |
650 | 7 | |a Ribavirin |2 NLM | |
650 | 7 | |a 49717AWG6K |2 NLM | |
650 | 7 | |a favipiravir |2 NLM | |
650 | 7 | |a EW5GL2X7E0 |2 NLM | |
650 | 7 | |a Ritonavir |2 NLM | |
650 | 7 | |a O3J8G9O825 |2 NLM | |
700 | 1 | |a A Enani, Mushira |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Saheb Sharif-Askari, Fatemeh |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a R Alghareeb, Mona |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a T Bin-Brikan, Roaa |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a A AlShahrani, Safar |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Halwani, Rabih |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Tleyjeh, Imad M |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t PloS one |d 2006 |g 16(2021), 6 vom: 10., Seite e0252984 |w (DE-627)NLM167327399 |x 1932-6203 |7 nnns |
773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:16 |g year:2021 |g number:6 |g day:10 |g pages:e0252984 |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0252984 |3 Volltext |
912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
912 | |a GBV_NLM | ||
951 | |a AR | ||
952 | |d 16 |j 2021 |e 6 |b 10 |h e0252984 |