Postponed Withholding : Balanced Decision-Making at the Margins of Viability

Advances in neonatology have led to improved survival for periviable infants. Immaturity still carries a high risk of short- and long-term harms, and uncertainty turns provision of life support into an ethical dilemma. Shared decision-making with parents has gained ground. However, the need to start immediate life support and the ensuing difficulty of withdrawing treatment stands in tension with the possibility of a fair decision-making process. Both the parental "instinct of saving" and "withdrawal resistance" involved can preclude shared decision-making. To help health care personnel and empower parents, we propose a novel approach labeled "postponed withholding." In the absence of a prenatal advance directive, life support is started at birth, followed by planned redirection to palliative care after one week, unless parents, after a thorough counseling process, actively ask for continued life support. Despite the emotional challenges, this approach can facilitate ethically balanced decision-making processes in the gray zone.

Errataetall:

CommentIn: Am J Bioeth. 2022 Nov;22(11):46-48. - PMID 36332034

Medienart:

E-Artikel

Erscheinungsjahr:

2022

Erschienen:

2022

Enthalten in:

Zur Gesamtaufnahme - volume:22

Enthalten in:

The American journal of bioethics : AJOB - 22(2022), 11 vom: 13. Nov., Seite 15-26

Sprache:

Englisch

Beteiligte Personen:

Syltern, Janicke [VerfasserIn]
Ursin, Lars [VerfasserIn]
Solberg, Berge [VerfasserIn]
Støen, Ragnhild [VerfasserIn]

Links:

Volltext

Themen:

Children and families
Decision-making
End-of-life issues
Journal Article
Pediatrics: neonatology
Professional-patient relationship

Anmerkungen:

Date Completed 08.11.2022

Date Revised 27.02.2024

published: Print-Electronic

CommentIn: Am J Bioeth. 2022 Nov;22(11):46-48. - PMID 36332034

Citation Status MEDLINE

doi:

10.1080/15265161.2021.1925777

funding:

Förderinstitution / Projekttitel:

PPN (Katalog-ID):

NLM325502234