On the dependence of quantitative diffusion-weighted imaging on scanner system characteristics and acquisition parameters : A large multicenter and multiparametric phantom study with unsupervised clustering analysis
Copyright © 2021 Associazione Italiana di Fisica Medica. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved..
PURPOSE: The purpose of this multicenter phantom study was to exploit an innovative approach, based on an extensive acquisition protocol and unsupervised clustering analysis, in order to assess any potential bias in apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) estimation due to different scanner characteristics. Moreover, we aimed at assessing, for the first time, any effect of acquisition plan/phase encoding direction on ADC estimation.
METHODS: Water phantom acquisitions were carried out on 39 scanners. DWI acquisitions (b-value = 0-200-400-600-800-1000 s/mm2) with different acquisition plans (axial, coronal, sagittal) and phase encoding directions (anterior/posterior and right/left, for the axial acquisition plan), for 3 orthogonal diffusion weighting gradient directions, were performed. For each acquisition setup, ADC values were measured in-center and off-center (6 different positions), resulting in an entire dataset of 84 × 39 = 3276 ADC values. Spatial uniformity of ADC maps was assessed by means of the percentage difference between off-center and in-center ADC values (Δ).
RESULTS: No significant dependence of in-center ADC values on acquisition plan/phase encoding direction was found. Ward unsupervised clustering analysis showed 3 distinct clusters of scanners and an association between Δ-values and manufacturer/model, whereas no association between Δ-values and maximum gradient strength, slew rate or static magnetic field strength was revealed. Several acquisition setups showed significant differences among groups, indicating the introduction of different biases in ADC estimation.
CONCLUSIONS: Unsupervised clustering analysis of DWI data, obtained from several scanners using an extensive acquisition protocol, allows to reveal an association between measured ADC values and manufacturer/model of scanner, as well as to identify suboptimal DWI acquisition setups for accurate ADC estimation.
Medienart: |
E-Artikel |
---|
Erscheinungsjahr: |
2021 |
---|---|
Erschienen: |
2021 |
Enthalten in: |
Zur Gesamtaufnahme - volume:85 |
---|---|
Enthalten in: |
Physica medica : PM : an international journal devoted to the applications of physics to medicine and biology : official journal of the Italian Association of Biomedical Physics (AIFB) - 85(2021) vom: 01. Mai, Seite 98-106 |
Sprache: |
Englisch |
---|
Links: |
---|
Themen: |
Apparent diffusion coefficient |
---|
Anmerkungen: |
Date Completed 25.06.2021 Date Revised 25.06.2021 published: Print-Electronic Citation Status MEDLINE |
---|
doi: |
10.1016/j.ejmp.2021.04.020 |
---|
funding: |
|
---|---|
Förderinstitution / Projekttitel: |
|
PPN (Katalog-ID): |
NLM325431132 |
---|
LEADER | 01000naa a22002652 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | NLM325431132 | ||
003 | DE-627 | ||
005 | 20231225192425.0 | ||
007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
008 | 231225s2021 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
024 | 7 | |a 10.1016/j.ejmp.2021.04.020 |2 doi | |
028 | 5 | 2 | |a pubmed24n1084.xml |
035 | |a (DE-627)NLM325431132 | ||
035 | |a (NLM)33991807 | ||
035 | |a (PII)S1120-1797(21)00177-0 | ||
040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
041 | |a eng | ||
100 | 1 | |a Fedeli, Luca |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 0 | |a On the dependence of quantitative diffusion-weighted imaging on scanner system characteristics and acquisition parameters |b A large multicenter and multiparametric phantom study with unsupervised clustering analysis |
264 | 1 | |c 2021 | |
336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |a ƒaComputermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |a ƒa Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
500 | |a Date Completed 25.06.2021 | ||
500 | |a Date Revised 25.06.2021 | ||
500 | |a published: Print-Electronic | ||
500 | |a Citation Status MEDLINE | ||
520 | |a Copyright © 2021 Associazione Italiana di Fisica Medica. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. | ||
520 | |a PURPOSE: The purpose of this multicenter phantom study was to exploit an innovative approach, based on an extensive acquisition protocol and unsupervised clustering analysis, in order to assess any potential bias in apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) estimation due to different scanner characteristics. Moreover, we aimed at assessing, for the first time, any effect of acquisition plan/phase encoding direction on ADC estimation | ||
520 | |a METHODS: Water phantom acquisitions were carried out on 39 scanners. DWI acquisitions (b-value = 0-200-400-600-800-1000 s/mm2) with different acquisition plans (axial, coronal, sagittal) and phase encoding directions (anterior/posterior and right/left, for the axial acquisition plan), for 3 orthogonal diffusion weighting gradient directions, were performed. For each acquisition setup, ADC values were measured in-center and off-center (6 different positions), resulting in an entire dataset of 84 × 39 = 3276 ADC values. Spatial uniformity of ADC maps was assessed by means of the percentage difference between off-center and in-center ADC values (Δ) | ||
520 | |a RESULTS: No significant dependence of in-center ADC values on acquisition plan/phase encoding direction was found. Ward unsupervised clustering analysis showed 3 distinct clusters of scanners and an association between Δ-values and manufacturer/model, whereas no association between Δ-values and maximum gradient strength, slew rate or static magnetic field strength was revealed. Several acquisition setups showed significant differences among groups, indicating the introduction of different biases in ADC estimation | ||
520 | |a CONCLUSIONS: Unsupervised clustering analysis of DWI data, obtained from several scanners using an extensive acquisition protocol, allows to reveal an association between measured ADC values and manufacturer/model of scanner, as well as to identify suboptimal DWI acquisition setups for accurate ADC estimation | ||
650 | 4 | |a Journal Article | |
650 | 4 | |a Multicenter Study | |
650 | 4 | |a Apparent diffusion coefficient | |
650 | 4 | |a Diffusion-weighted imaging | |
650 | 4 | |a Magnetic resonance imaging | |
650 | 4 | |a Quality assurance | |
700 | 1 | |a Benelli, Matteo |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Busoni, Simone |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Belli, Giacomo |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Ciccarone, Antonio |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Coniglio, Angela |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Esposito, Marco |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Nocetti, Luca |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Sghedoni, Roberto |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Tarducci, Roberto |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Altabella, Luisa |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Belligotti, Eleonora |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Bettarini, Silvia |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Betti, Margherita |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Caivano, Rocchina |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Carnì, Marco |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Chiappiniello, Andrea |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Cimolai, Sara |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Cretti, Fabiola |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Fulcheri, Christian |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Gasperi, Chiara |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Giacometti, Mara |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Levrero, Fabrizio |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Lizio, Domenico |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Maieron, Marta |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Marzi, Simona |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Mascaro, Lorella |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Mazzocchi, Silvia |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Meliadò, Gabriele |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Morzenti, Sabrina |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Niespolo, Alessandra |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Noferini, Linhsia |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Oberhofer, Nadia |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Orsingher, Laura |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Quattrocchi, Mariagrazia |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Ricci, Alessandra |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Savini, Alessandro |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Taddeucci, Adriana |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Testa, Claudia |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Tortoli, Paolo |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Gobbi, Gianni |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Gori, Cesare |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Bernardi, Luca |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Giannelli, Marco |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Mazzoni, Lorenzo Nicola |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 0 | |a Italian Association of Physics in Medicine (AIFM) Working Group on MR Quantification, Intercomparison and Quality Assurance |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Physica medica : PM : an international journal devoted to the applications of physics to medicine and biology : official journal of the Italian Association of Biomedical Physics (AIFB) |d 1997 |g 85(2021) vom: 01. Mai, Seite 98-106 |w (DE-627)NLM092554024 |x 1724-191X |7 nnns |
773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:85 |g year:2021 |g day:01 |g month:05 |g pages:98-106 |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejmp.2021.04.020 |3 Volltext |
912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
912 | |a GBV_NLM | ||
951 | |a AR | ||
952 | |d 85 |j 2021 |b 01 |c 05 |h 98-106 |