Evaluation of the Proximal Ulna Dorsal Angulation for Ulnar Component Sizing in Elbow Prosthetic Reconstruction After Distal Humeral Resection of Tumor
INTRODUCTION: Elbow prosthetic reconstruction after distal humeral tumor resection is challenging. We identify the value of the proximal ulna dorsal angulation (PUDA) as an easily-measured radiographic parameter that can help inform ulnar component sizing in the Solar Elbow System (SES) and the Modular Universal Tumor and Revision System (MUTARS), two modular prosthetic systems that are commonly used after tumor resection in this anatomic location. We hypothesized that a larger PUDA measurement would require smaller ulnar stems.
METHODS: Demographic data and PUDA measurements were retrospectively reviewed for 514 patients. Multivariate regression was used to determine the effects of patient demographic data on the PUDA. PUDA measurements were collected by three independent reviewers on lateral elbow radiographs. MUTARS and SES templating software was then used to validate the relationship between the PUDA and ulnar stem sizing.
RESULTS: Regression analysis showed no substantial contribution of demographic variables to the PUDA measurement (adjusted R2 = 0.02, F(6, 508) = 2.704, P = 0.01). The MUTARS implant fit 97% of elbows with a PUDA <5° and 91.6% of elbows with PUDA ≥5° (P = 0.26). The largest SES combination fit 100% of elbows with a PUDA ≤10° versus 93% of elbows with a PUDA >10° (P = 0.029). Elbows accommodating the largest SES combination had a smaller median PUDA (5.4° versus 11.7°, P = 0.034); elbows accommodating the MUTARS implant had a smaller median PUDA (5.4° versus 5.8°, P = 0.34).
DISCUSSION: The PUDA is a valuable and easily used preoperative planning tool for prosthetic elbow reconstruction after tumor resection. The proximal ulna dorsal angulation can be easily measured to predict ulnar component fit and reduce intraoperative complications. In patients with a PUDA ≥5°, ulnar component stem fit for current systems may be more challenging.
| Medienart: |
E-Artikel |
|---|
| Erscheinungsjahr: |
2020 |
|---|---|
| Erschienen: |
2020 |
| Enthalten in: |
Zur Gesamtaufnahme - volume:4 |
|---|---|
| Enthalten in: |
Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. Global research & reviews - 4(2020), 5 vom: 14. Mai, Seite e2000062 |
| Sprache: |
Englisch |
|---|
| Beteiligte Personen: |
Yeung, Caleb M [VerfasserIn] |
|---|
| Links: |
|---|
| Themen: |
|---|
| Anmerkungen: |
Date Completed 25.10.2021 Date Revised 25.10.2021 published: Print Citation Status MEDLINE |
|---|
| doi: |
10.5435/JAAOSGlobal-D-20-00062 |
|---|
| funding: |
|
|---|---|
| Förderinstitution / Projekttitel: |
|
| PPN (Katalog-ID): |
NLM325222088 |
|---|
| LEADER | 01000naa a22002652 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | NLM325222088 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20231225192002.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 231225s2020 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.5435/JAAOSGlobal-D-20-00062 |2 doi | |
| 028 | 5 | 2 | |a pubmed24n1084.xml |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)NLM325222088 | ||
| 035 | |a (NLM)33970583 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Yeung, Caleb M |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Evaluation of the Proximal Ulna Dorsal Angulation for Ulnar Component Sizing in Elbow Prosthetic Reconstruction After Distal Humeral Resection of Tumor |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2020 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a ƒaComputermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a ƒa Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 500 | |a Date Completed 25.10.2021 | ||
| 500 | |a Date Revised 25.10.2021 | ||
| 500 | |a published: Print | ||
| 500 | |a Citation Status MEDLINE | ||
| 520 | |a INTRODUCTION: Elbow prosthetic reconstruction after distal humeral tumor resection is challenging. We identify the value of the proximal ulna dorsal angulation (PUDA) as an easily-measured radiographic parameter that can help inform ulnar component sizing in the Solar Elbow System (SES) and the Modular Universal Tumor and Revision System (MUTARS), two modular prosthetic systems that are commonly used after tumor resection in this anatomic location. We hypothesized that a larger PUDA measurement would require smaller ulnar stems | ||
| 520 | |a METHODS: Demographic data and PUDA measurements were retrospectively reviewed for 514 patients. Multivariate regression was used to determine the effects of patient demographic data on the PUDA. PUDA measurements were collected by three independent reviewers on lateral elbow radiographs. MUTARS and SES templating software was then used to validate the relationship between the PUDA and ulnar stem sizing | ||
| 520 | |a RESULTS: Regression analysis showed no substantial contribution of demographic variables to the PUDA measurement (adjusted R2 = 0.02, F(6, 508) = 2.704, P = 0.01). The MUTARS implant fit 97% of elbows with a PUDA <5° and 91.6% of elbows with PUDA ≥5° (P = 0.26). The largest SES combination fit 100% of elbows with a PUDA ≤10° versus 93% of elbows with a PUDA >10° (P = 0.029). Elbows accommodating the largest SES combination had a smaller median PUDA (5.4° versus 11.7°, P = 0.034); elbows accommodating the MUTARS implant had a smaller median PUDA (5.4° versus 5.8°, P = 0.34) | ||
| 520 | |a DISCUSSION: The PUDA is a valuable and easily used preoperative planning tool for prosthetic elbow reconstruction after tumor resection. The proximal ulna dorsal angulation can be easily measured to predict ulnar component fit and reduce intraoperative complications. In patients with a PUDA ≥5°, ulnar component stem fit for current systems may be more challenging | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Journal Article | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Lans, Jonathan |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Kuechle, Joseph B |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Wright, Zachary |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Chang, Connie Y |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Lozano-Calderón, Santiago A |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. Global research & reviews |d 2017 |g 4(2020), 5 vom: 14. Mai, Seite e2000062 |w (DE-627)NLM288484762 |x 2474-7661 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:4 |g year:2020 |g number:5 |g day:14 |g month:05 |g pages:e2000062 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u http://dx.doi.org/10.5435/JAAOSGlobal-D-20-00062 |3 Volltext |
| 912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_NLM | ||
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| 952 | |d 4 |j 2020 |e 5 |b 14 |c 05 |h e2000062 | ||