Safety and efficacy of lenvatinib by starting dose based on body weight in patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma in REFLECT
BACKGROUND: REFLECT was an open-label, phase 3 study comparing the efficacy and safety of lenvatinib versus sorafenib in patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (uHCC). Based on phase 2 study (Study 202) results, body weight-based dosing for lenvatinib was used in REFLECT to minimize dose disruptions and modifications needed to address dose-related adverse events. This post hoc analysis of REFLECT data assessed lenvatinib efficacy and safety by body weight group.
METHODS: The study randomly administered lenvatinib (n = 476) or sorafenib (n = 475) to patients with untreated (no prior systemic therapy) uHCC. Lenvatinib starting-dose data were stratified by body weight: patients weighing < 60 kg received 8 mg/day; patients weighing ≥ 60 kg received 12 mg/day. Overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate, and safety were assessed.
RESULTS: Survival outcomes and safety profiles appeared similar between the two body-weight-based lenvatinib starting-dose groups. Median OS for patients in the < 60 kg body weight group (n = 153) was 13.4 months [95% confidence interval (CI) 10.5-15.7] compared to 13.7 months (95% CI 12.0-15.6) in the ≥ 60 kg body weight group (n = 325). In both lenvatinib groups, PFS was 7.4 months (< 60 kg group: 95% CI 5.4-9.2; ≥ 60 kg group: 95% CI 6.9-9.0). Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) required dose modifications in 43.0% in the < 60 kg body weight group and 57.5% in the ≥ 60 kg body weight group.
CONCLUSIONS: This exploratory analysis of data from REFLECT indicated that body weight-based lenvatinib dosing in patients with uHCC was successful in maintaining efficacy, with comparable rates of TEAEs and dose modifications in the two body weight groups.
CLININCAL TRIAL: Trial registration ID: ClinicalTrials.gov # NCT01761266.
Medienart: |
E-Artikel |
---|
Erscheinungsjahr: |
2021 |
---|---|
Erschienen: |
2021 |
Enthalten in: |
Zur Gesamtaufnahme - volume:56 |
---|---|
Enthalten in: |
Journal of gastroenterology - 56(2021), 6 vom: 23. Juni, Seite 570-580 |
Sprache: |
Englisch |
---|
Beteiligte Personen: |
Okusaka, Takuji [VerfasserIn] |
---|
Links: |
---|
Themen: |
9ZOQ3TZI87 |
---|
Anmerkungen: |
Date Completed 03.12.2021 Date Revised 14.12.2021 published: Print-Electronic ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01761266 Citation Status MEDLINE |
---|
doi: |
10.1007/s00535-021-01785-0 |
---|
funding: |
|
---|---|
Förderinstitution / Projekttitel: |
|
PPN (Katalog-ID): |
NLM325016526 |
---|
LEADER | 01000naa a22002652 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | NLM325016526 | ||
003 | DE-627 | ||
005 | 20231225191535.0 | ||
007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
008 | 231225s2021 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
024 | 7 | |a 10.1007/s00535-021-01785-0 |2 doi | |
028 | 5 | 2 | |a pubmed24n1083.xml |
035 | |a (DE-627)NLM325016526 | ||
035 | |a (NLM)33948712 | ||
040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
041 | |a eng | ||
100 | 1 | |a Okusaka, Takuji |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 0 | |a Safety and efficacy of lenvatinib by starting dose based on body weight in patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma in REFLECT |
264 | 1 | |c 2021 | |
336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |a ƒaComputermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |a ƒa Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
500 | |a Date Completed 03.12.2021 | ||
500 | |a Date Revised 14.12.2021 | ||
500 | |a published: Print-Electronic | ||
500 | |a ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01761266 | ||
500 | |a Citation Status MEDLINE | ||
520 | |a BACKGROUND: REFLECT was an open-label, phase 3 study comparing the efficacy and safety of lenvatinib versus sorafenib in patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (uHCC). Based on phase 2 study (Study 202) results, body weight-based dosing for lenvatinib was used in REFLECT to minimize dose disruptions and modifications needed to address dose-related adverse events. This post hoc analysis of REFLECT data assessed lenvatinib efficacy and safety by body weight group | ||
520 | |a METHODS: The study randomly administered lenvatinib (n = 476) or sorafenib (n = 475) to patients with untreated (no prior systemic therapy) uHCC. Lenvatinib starting-dose data were stratified by body weight: patients weighing < 60 kg received 8 mg/day; patients weighing ≥ 60 kg received 12 mg/day. Overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate, and safety were assessed | ||
520 | |a RESULTS: Survival outcomes and safety profiles appeared similar between the two body-weight-based lenvatinib starting-dose groups. Median OS for patients in the < 60 kg body weight group (n = 153) was 13.4 months [95% confidence interval (CI) 10.5-15.7] compared to 13.7 months (95% CI 12.0-15.6) in the ≥ 60 kg body weight group (n = 325). In both lenvatinib groups, PFS was 7.4 months (< 60 kg group: 95% CI 5.4-9.2; ≥ 60 kg group: 95% CI 6.9-9.0). Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) required dose modifications in 43.0% in the < 60 kg body weight group and 57.5% in the ≥ 60 kg body weight group | ||
520 | |a CONCLUSIONS: This exploratory analysis of data from REFLECT indicated that body weight-based lenvatinib dosing in patients with uHCC was successful in maintaining efficacy, with comparable rates of TEAEs and dose modifications in the two body weight groups | ||
520 | |a CLININCAL TRIAL: Trial registration ID: ClinicalTrials.gov # NCT01761266 | ||
650 | 4 | |a Journal Article | |
650 | 4 | |a Body weight | |
650 | 4 | |a Dosing | |
650 | 4 | |a Hepatocellular carcinoma | |
650 | 4 | |a Lenvatinib | |
650 | 4 | |a REFLECT | |
650 | 7 | |a Antineoplastic Agents |2 NLM | |
650 | 7 | |a Phenylurea Compounds |2 NLM | |
650 | 7 | |a Quinolines |2 NLM | |
650 | 7 | |a Sorafenib |2 NLM | |
650 | 7 | |a 9ZOQ3TZI87 |2 NLM | |
650 | 7 | |a lenvatinib |2 NLM | |
650 | 7 | |a EE083865G2 |2 NLM | |
700 | 1 | |a Ikeda, Kenji |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Kudo, Masatoshi |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Finn, Richard |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Qin, Shukui |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Han, Kwang-Hyub |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Cheng, Ann-Lii |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Piscaglia, Fabio |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Kobayashi, Masahiro |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Sung, Max |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Chen, Minshan |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Wyrwicz, Lucjan |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Yoon, Jung-Hwan |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Ren, Zhenggang |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Mody, Kalgi |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Dutcus, Corina |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Tamai, Toshiyuki |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Ren, Min |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Hayato, Seiichi |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Kumada, Hiromitsu |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Journal of gastroenterology |d 1994 |g 56(2021), 6 vom: 23. Juni, Seite 570-580 |w (DE-627)NLM074913832 |x 1435-5922 |7 nnns |
773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:56 |g year:2021 |g number:6 |g day:23 |g month:06 |g pages:570-580 |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00535-021-01785-0 |3 Volltext |
912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
912 | |a GBV_NLM | ||
951 | |a AR | ||
952 | |d 56 |j 2021 |e 6 |b 23 |c 06 |h 570-580 |