Prospective, Randomized, Controlled Trial of Ultra-modified Internal Sphincterotomy vs Closed Lateral Internal Sphincterotomy for Chronic Fissure-in-Ano
BACKGROUND: Currently, the lateral internal sphincterotomy is the treatment of choice for a chronic anal fissure (CAF). However, the length of the internal sphincter incision varies, due to lack of standardization. Insufficient length increases the risk of recurrence. To compare a new ultra-modified internal sphincterotomy (UMIS) to the closed lateral internal sphincterotomy (CLIS) for treating CAF, based on internal anal sphincter function and postoperative complications. The primary endpoint was continence after UMIS. The secondary outcomes were CAF healing complications, visual analog scale pain scores, and sphincter pressures.
METHODS: This was a prospective, randomized, controlled trial (block randomization method). 200 patients with CAFs were randomly assigned to receive either UMIS (n = 100) or the closed lateral internal sphincterotomy (CLIS) (n = 100). Follow-up was 2 years. RESULTS: All (100%) patients in both groups showed clinical improvement at 1 month post-surgery. Recurrences were accompanied by deteriorations in Cleveland Clinic Florida Fecal Incontinence scores at 12 months and 2 years (P < .05). The groups showed significant differences in fissure healing rates and pain scores. After 1 and 2 years, incontinence rates were significantly higher, and patient satisfaction scores were significantly lower in the CLIS group than the UMIS group (P < .05).
CONCLUSION: UMIS provided a faster healing rate and fewer side effects than the CLIS for treating CAFs. These results might lead to a standardized treatment among surgeons.
| Medienart: |
E-Artikel |
|---|
| Erscheinungsjahr: |
2022 |
|---|---|
| Erschienen: |
2022 |
| Enthalten in: |
Zur Gesamtaufnahme - volume:88 |
|---|---|
| Enthalten in: |
The American surgeon - 88(2022), 9 vom: 11. Sept., Seite 2388-2396 |
| Sprache: |
Englisch |
|---|
| Beteiligte Personen: |
Sungurtekin, Ugur [VerfasserIn] |
|---|
| Links: |
|---|
| Themen: |
Fissure-in-ano |
|---|
| Anmerkungen: |
Date Completed 20.09.2022 Date Revised 20.09.2022 published: Print-Electronic Citation Status MEDLINE |
|---|
| doi: |
10.1177/00031348211011104 |
|---|
| funding: |
|
|---|---|
| Förderinstitution / Projekttitel: |
|
| PPN (Katalog-ID): |
NLM324163622 |
|---|
| LEADER | 01000naa a22002652 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | NLM324163622 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20231225185729.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 231225s2022 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1177/00031348211011104 |2 doi | |
| 028 | 5 | 2 | |a pubmed24n1080.xml |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)NLM324163622 | ||
| 035 | |a (NLM)33861669 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Sungurtekin, Ugur |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Prospective, Randomized, Controlled Trial of Ultra-modified Internal Sphincterotomy vs Closed Lateral Internal Sphincterotomy for Chronic Fissure-in-Ano |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2022 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a ƒaComputermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a ƒa Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 500 | |a Date Completed 20.09.2022 | ||
| 500 | |a Date Revised 20.09.2022 | ||
| 500 | |a published: Print-Electronic | ||
| 500 | |a Citation Status MEDLINE | ||
| 520 | |a BACKGROUND: Currently, the lateral internal sphincterotomy is the treatment of choice for a chronic anal fissure (CAF). However, the length of the internal sphincter incision varies, due to lack of standardization. Insufficient length increases the risk of recurrence. To compare a new ultra-modified internal sphincterotomy (UMIS) to the closed lateral internal sphincterotomy (CLIS) for treating CAF, based on internal anal sphincter function and postoperative complications. The primary endpoint was continence after UMIS. The secondary outcomes were CAF healing complications, visual analog scale pain scores, and sphincter pressures | ||
| 520 | |a METHODS: This was a prospective, randomized, controlled trial (block randomization method). 200 patients with CAFs were randomly assigned to receive either UMIS (n = 100) or the closed lateral internal sphincterotomy (CLIS) (n = 100). Follow-up was 2 years. RESULTS: All (100%) patients in both groups showed clinical improvement at 1 month post-surgery. Recurrences were accompanied by deteriorations in Cleveland Clinic Florida Fecal Incontinence scores at 12 months and 2 years (P < .05). The groups showed significant differences in fissure healing rates and pain scores. After 1 and 2 years, incontinence rates were significantly higher, and patient satisfaction scores were significantly lower in the CLIS group than the UMIS group (P < .05) | ||
| 520 | |a CONCLUSION: UMIS provided a faster healing rate and fewer side effects than the CLIS for treating CAFs. These results might lead to a standardized treatment among surgeons | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Journal Article | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Randomized Controlled Trial | |
| 650 | 4 | |a fissure-in-ano | |
| 650 | 4 | |a incontinence | |
| 650 | 4 | |a sphincterotomy | |
| 650 | 4 | |a surgical technique | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Ozgen, Utku |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Sungurtekin, Hulya |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t The American surgeon |d 1951 |g 88(2022), 9 vom: 11. Sept., Seite 2388-2396 |w (DE-627)NLM000046418 |x 1555-9823 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:88 |g year:2022 |g number:9 |g day:11 |g month:09 |g pages:2388-2396 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/00031348211011104 |3 Volltext |
| 912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_NLM | ||
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| 952 | |d 88 |j 2022 |e 9 |b 11 |c 09 |h 2388-2396 | ||