The Quixotic Task of Forecasting Peaks of COVID-19 : Rather Focus on Forward and Backward Projections
Copyright © 2021 Reis, Oliveira, Quintela, Campos, Gomes, Rocha, Lobosco and dos Santos..
Over the last months, mathematical models have been extensively used to help control the COVID-19 pandemic worldwide. Although extremely useful in many tasks, most models have performed poorly in forecasting the pandemic peaks. We investigate this common pitfall by forecasting four countries' pandemic peak: Austria, Germany, Italy, and South Korea. Far from the peaks, our models can forecast the pandemic dynamics 20 days ahead. Nevertheless, when calibrating our models close to the day of the pandemic peak, all forecasts fail. Uncertainty quantification and sensitivity analysis revealed the main obstacle: the misestimation of the transmission rate. Inverse uncertainty quantification has shown that significant changes in transmission rate commonly precede a peak. These changes are a key factor in forecasting the pandemic peak. Long forecasts of the pandemic peak are therefore undermined by the lack of models that can forecast changes in the transmission rate, i.e., how a particular society behaves, changes of mitigation policies, or how society chooses to respond to them. In addition, our studies revealed that even short forecasts of the pandemic peak are challenging. Backward projections have shown us that the correct estimation of any temporal change in the transmission rate is only possible many days ahead. Our results suggest that the distance between a change in the transmission rate and its correct identification in the curve of active infected cases can be as long as 15 days. This is intrinsic to the phenomenon and how it affects epidemic data: a new case is usually only reported after an incubation period followed by a delay associated with the test. In summary, our results suggest the phenomenon itself challenges the task of forecasting the peak of the COVID-19 pandemic when only epidemic data is available. Nevertheless, we show that exciting results can be obtained when using the same models to project different scenarios of reduced transmission rates. Therefore, our results highlight that mathematical modeling can help control COVID-19 pandemic by backward projections that characterize the phenomena' essential features and forward projections when different scenarios and strategies can be tested and used for decision-making.
| Medienart: |
E-Artikel |
|---|
| Erscheinungsjahr: |
2021 |
|---|---|
| Erschienen: |
2021 |
| Enthalten in: |
Zur Gesamtaufnahme - volume:9 |
|---|---|
| Enthalten in: |
Frontiers in public health - 9(2021) vom: 31., Seite 623521 |
| Sprache: |
Englisch |
|---|
| Beteiligte Personen: |
Reis, Ruy Freitas [VerfasserIn] |
|---|
| Links: |
|---|
| Themen: |
COVID-19 |
|---|
| Anmerkungen: |
Date Completed 16.04.2021 Date Revised 16.04.2021 published: Electronic-eCollection Citation Status MEDLINE |
|---|
| doi: |
10.3389/fpubh.2021.623521 |
|---|
| funding: |
|
|---|---|
| Förderinstitution / Projekttitel: |
|
| PPN (Katalog-ID): |
NLM323519970 |
|---|
| LEADER | 01000naa a22002652 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | NLM323519970 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20231225184346.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 231225s2021 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.3389/fpubh.2021.623521 |2 doi | |
| 028 | 5 | 2 | |a pubmed24n1078.xml |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)NLM323519970 | ||
| 035 | |a (NLM)33796495 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Reis, Ruy Freitas |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 4 | |a The Quixotic Task of Forecasting Peaks of COVID-19 |b Rather Focus on Forward and Backward Projections |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2021 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a ƒaComputermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a ƒa Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 500 | |a Date Completed 16.04.2021 | ||
| 500 | |a Date Revised 16.04.2021 | ||
| 500 | |a published: Electronic-eCollection | ||
| 500 | |a Citation Status MEDLINE | ||
| 520 | |a Copyright © 2021 Reis, Oliveira, Quintela, Campos, Gomes, Rocha, Lobosco and dos Santos. | ||
| 520 | |a Over the last months, mathematical models have been extensively used to help control the COVID-19 pandemic worldwide. Although extremely useful in many tasks, most models have performed poorly in forecasting the pandemic peaks. We investigate this common pitfall by forecasting four countries' pandemic peak: Austria, Germany, Italy, and South Korea. Far from the peaks, our models can forecast the pandemic dynamics 20 days ahead. Nevertheless, when calibrating our models close to the day of the pandemic peak, all forecasts fail. Uncertainty quantification and sensitivity analysis revealed the main obstacle: the misestimation of the transmission rate. Inverse uncertainty quantification has shown that significant changes in transmission rate commonly precede a peak. These changes are a key factor in forecasting the pandemic peak. Long forecasts of the pandemic peak are therefore undermined by the lack of models that can forecast changes in the transmission rate, i.e., how a particular society behaves, changes of mitigation policies, or how society chooses to respond to them. In addition, our studies revealed that even short forecasts of the pandemic peak are challenging. Backward projections have shown us that the correct estimation of any temporal change in the transmission rate is only possible many days ahead. Our results suggest that the distance between a change in the transmission rate and its correct identification in the curve of active infected cases can be as long as 15 days. This is intrinsic to the phenomenon and how it affects epidemic data: a new case is usually only reported after an incubation period followed by a delay associated with the test. In summary, our results suggest the phenomenon itself challenges the task of forecasting the peak of the COVID-19 pandemic when only epidemic data is available. Nevertheless, we show that exciting results can be obtained when using the same models to project different scenarios of reduced transmission rates. Therefore, our results highlight that mathematical modeling can help control COVID-19 pandemic by backward projections that characterize the phenomena' essential features and forward projections when different scenarios and strategies can be tested and used for decision-making | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Journal Article | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't | |
| 650 | 4 | |a COVID-19 | |
| 650 | 4 | |a epidemiology | |
| 650 | 4 | |a forecasting | |
| 650 | 4 | |a mathematical modeling | |
| 650 | 4 | |a projection | |
| 650 | 4 | |a uncertainty quantification | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Oliveira, Rafael Sachetto |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Quintela, Bárbara de Melo |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Campos, Joventino de Oliveira |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Gomes, Johnny Moreira |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Rocha, Bernardo Martins |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Lobosco, Marcelo |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Dos Santos, Rodrigo Weber |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Frontiers in public health |d 2013 |g 9(2021) vom: 31., Seite 623521 |w (DE-627)NLM23377548X |x 2296-2565 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:9 |g year:2021 |g day:31 |g pages:623521 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2021.623521 |3 Volltext |
| 912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_NLM | ||
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| 952 | |d 9 |j 2021 |b 31 |h 623521 | ||