Activity of cefiderocol, ceftazidime-avibactam, and eravacycline against extended-spectrum cephalosporin-resistant Escherichia coli clinical isolates (2012-20017) in relation to phylogenetic background, sequence type 131 subclones, blaCTX-M genotype, and coresistance
Copyright © 2021. Published by Elsevier Inc..
Extended-spectrum cephalosporin-resistant Escherichia coli (ESCREC) are a growing threat. Leading ESCREC lineages include sequence type ST131, especially its (blaCTX-M-15-associated) H30Rx subclone and (blaCTX-M-27-associated) C1-M27 subset within the H30R1 subclone. We assessed cefiderocol, ceftazidime-avibactam, eravacycline, and 11 comparators for activity against 216 well-characterized ESCREC isolates (Minnesota, 2012-2017), then compared broth microdilution MICs with phylogenetic and clonal background, beta-lactamase genotype (blaCTX-M; group 1 and 9 variants), and coresistance. Percent susceptible was >95% (cefiderocol, ceftazidime-avibactam, eravacycline, carbapenems, amikacin, piperacillin-tazobactam, tigecycline), 64% to 75% (gentamicin, minocycline), or <40% (ceftazidime, levofloxacin, colistin). MICs varied significantly by multiple bacterial characteristics, in agent-specific patterns. The least-susceptible ST131 subset was the non-C1-M27 fraction within H30R1. Cefiderocol, ceftazidime-avibactam, and eravacycline MICs tended to be higher among isolates resistant (vs. susceptible) to diverse comparators. Thus, cefiderocol, ceftazidime-avibactam, and eravacycline are promising carbapenem-sparing alternatives for treating ESCREC infections, and their strength of activity varies in relation to diverse bacterial characteristics.
Medienart: |
E-Artikel |
---|
Erscheinungsjahr: |
2021 |
---|---|
Erschienen: |
2021 |
Enthalten in: |
Zur Gesamtaufnahme - volume:100 |
---|---|
Enthalten in: |
Diagnostic microbiology and infectious disease - 100(2021), 1 vom: 01. Mai, Seite 115314 |
Sprache: |
Englisch |
---|
Beteiligte Personen: |
Johnston, Brian D [VerfasserIn] |
---|
Links: |
---|
Anmerkungen: |
Date Completed 13.09.2021 Date Revised 13.09.2021 published: Print-Electronic Citation Status MEDLINE |
---|
doi: |
10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2021.115314 |
---|
funding: |
|
---|---|
Förderinstitution / Projekttitel: |
|
PPN (Katalog-ID): |
NLM321379101 |
---|
LEADER | 01000naa a22002652 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | NLM321379101 | ||
003 | DE-627 | ||
005 | 20231225175700.0 | ||
007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
008 | 231225s2021 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
024 | 7 | |a 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2021.115314 |2 doi | |
028 | 5 | 2 | |a pubmed24n1071.xml |
035 | |a (DE-627)NLM321379101 | ||
035 | |a (NLM)33578059 | ||
035 | |a (PII)S0732-8893(21)00007-9 | ||
040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
041 | |a eng | ||
100 | 1 | |a Johnston, Brian D |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 0 | |a Activity of cefiderocol, ceftazidime-avibactam, and eravacycline against extended-spectrum cephalosporin-resistant Escherichia coli clinical isolates (2012-20017) in relation to phylogenetic background, sequence type 131 subclones, blaCTX-M genotype, and coresistance |
264 | 1 | |c 2021 | |
336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |a ƒaComputermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |a ƒa Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
500 | |a Date Completed 13.09.2021 | ||
500 | |a Date Revised 13.09.2021 | ||
500 | |a published: Print-Electronic | ||
500 | |a Citation Status MEDLINE | ||
520 | |a Copyright © 2021. Published by Elsevier Inc. | ||
520 | |a Extended-spectrum cephalosporin-resistant Escherichia coli (ESCREC) are a growing threat. Leading ESCREC lineages include sequence type ST131, especially its (blaCTX-M-15-associated) H30Rx subclone and (blaCTX-M-27-associated) C1-M27 subset within the H30R1 subclone. We assessed cefiderocol, ceftazidime-avibactam, eravacycline, and 11 comparators for activity against 216 well-characterized ESCREC isolates (Minnesota, 2012-2017), then compared broth microdilution MICs with phylogenetic and clonal background, beta-lactamase genotype (blaCTX-M; group 1 and 9 variants), and coresistance. Percent susceptible was >95% (cefiderocol, ceftazidime-avibactam, eravacycline, carbapenems, amikacin, piperacillin-tazobactam, tigecycline), 64% to 75% (gentamicin, minocycline), or <40% (ceftazidime, levofloxacin, colistin). MICs varied significantly by multiple bacterial characteristics, in agent-specific patterns. The least-susceptible ST131 subset was the non-C1-M27 fraction within H30R1. Cefiderocol, ceftazidime-avibactam, and eravacycline MICs tended to be higher among isolates resistant (vs. susceptible) to diverse comparators. Thus, cefiderocol, ceftazidime-avibactam, and eravacycline are promising carbapenem-sparing alternatives for treating ESCREC infections, and their strength of activity varies in relation to diverse bacterial characteristics | ||
650 | 4 | |a Journal Article | |
650 | 4 | |a E. coli ST131 H30 | |
650 | 4 | |a antimicrobial therapy | |
650 | 4 | |a bla(CTX-M) genotype | |
650 | 4 | |a cefiderocol | |
650 | 4 | |a ceftazidime-avibactam | |
650 | 4 | |a eravacycline | |
650 | 4 | |a extended-spectrum cephalosporin-resistant | |
650 | 4 | |a minimum inhibitory concentration | |
650 | 4 | |a multidrug resistance | |
650 | 7 | |a Anti-Bacterial Agents |2 NLM | |
650 | 7 | |a Azabicyclo Compounds |2 NLM | |
650 | 7 | |a Drug Combinations |2 NLM | |
650 | 7 | |a Tetracyclines |2 NLM | |
650 | 7 | |a avibactam, ceftazidime drug combination |2 NLM | |
650 | 7 | |a eravacycline |2 NLM | |
650 | 7 | |a 07896928ZC |2 NLM | |
650 | 7 | |a Ceftazidime |2 NLM | |
650 | 7 | |a 9M416Z9QNR |2 NLM | |
700 | 1 | |a Thuras, Paul |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Porter, Stephen B |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Clabots, Connie |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Johnsona, James R |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Diagnostic microbiology and infectious disease |d 1986 |g 100(2021), 1 vom: 01. Mai, Seite 115314 |w (DE-627)NLM01262845X |x 1879-0070 |7 nnns |
773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:100 |g year:2021 |g number:1 |g day:01 |g month:05 |g pages:115314 |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2021.115314 |3 Volltext |
912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
912 | |a GBV_NLM | ||
951 | |a AR | ||
952 | |d 100 |j 2021 |e 1 |b 01 |c 05 |h 115314 |