Home Dialysis : A Majority Chooses It, a Minority Gets It
© 2021 S. Karger AG, Basel..
INTRODUCTION: When choosing a modality for outpatient renal replacement therapy, patients and medical providers have 3 options to choose from in-center hemodialysis (HD), home HD (HHD), and peritoneal dialysis (PD). In 2017, just over 10% of incident ESKD patients were on a home dialysis modality. We set out to determine outcomes of dialysis modality education in both pre-dialysis and dialysis patients. Moreover, we examined barriers that preclude patients from choosing home dialysis.
METHODS: This was a single-center, retrospective study looking at patients who were referred to the CKD educator for dialysis modality education between January 1, 2019, and March 31, 2020. Patient demographics, preferred language of communication, stage of renal disease, and reasons for patients' refusal to undertake a home dialysis modality were recorded. Patients' average household income and driving distance to our home dialysis unit were calculated using their home zip code.
RESULTS: 167 patients were referred for CKD education. Mean age was 60 years, and 59% male, 42% African American, 22% White, 7% Asian, and 28% were Hispanic or Latino. Only 23% of the total cohort chose in-center HD, while 74% chose a home dialysis modality (59% PD and 15% HHD), and the remaining patients remained undecided. 56% of in-center HD patients chose a home dialysis modality. The most commonly cited barriers to home dialysis were lack of a care partner, lack of home space, and patient preference.
LIMITATIONS: Over 90% of our patients reside in NY City where home space is limited. We require in our home HD program that patients have a trained care partner present during their treatments. We cannot assume that all CKD stage-4 patients or higher were either referred for CKD education or followed through on the referral.
CONCLUSIONS: A large discrepancy between informed patients' choices and the reality of the current dialysis landscape. Absence of a care partner, lack of home space, and patients not deemed appropriate surgical candidates were the main driving forces in their not opting for a home modality.
| Medienart: |
E-Artikel |
|---|
| Erscheinungsjahr: |
2021 |
|---|---|
| Erschienen: |
2021 |
| Enthalten in: |
Zur Gesamtaufnahme - volume:50 |
|---|---|
| Enthalten in: |
Blood purification - 50(2021), 6 vom: 31., Seite 818-822 |
| Sprache: |
Englisch |
|---|
| Beteiligte Personen: |
El Shamy, Osama [VerfasserIn] |
|---|
| Links: |
|---|
| Themen: |
CKD education |
|---|
| Anmerkungen: |
Date Completed 20.01.2022 Date Revised 20.01.2022 published: Print-Electronic Citation Status MEDLINE |
|---|
| doi: |
10.1159/000512539 |
|---|
| funding: |
|
|---|---|
| Förderinstitution / Projekttitel: |
|
| PPN (Katalog-ID): |
NLM320653870 |
|---|
| LEADER | 01000naa a22002652 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | NLM320653870 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20231225174036.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 231225s2021 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1159/000512539 |2 doi | |
| 028 | 5 | 2 | |a pubmed24n1068.xml |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)NLM320653870 | ||
| 035 | |a (NLM)33503613 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a El Shamy, Osama |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Home Dialysis |b A Majority Chooses It, a Minority Gets It |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2021 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a ƒaComputermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a ƒa Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 500 | |a Date Completed 20.01.2022 | ||
| 500 | |a Date Revised 20.01.2022 | ||
| 500 | |a published: Print-Electronic | ||
| 500 | |a Citation Status MEDLINE | ||
| 520 | |a © 2021 S. Karger AG, Basel. | ||
| 520 | |a INTRODUCTION: When choosing a modality for outpatient renal replacement therapy, patients and medical providers have 3 options to choose from in-center hemodialysis (HD), home HD (HHD), and peritoneal dialysis (PD). In 2017, just over 10% of incident ESKD patients were on a home dialysis modality. We set out to determine outcomes of dialysis modality education in both pre-dialysis and dialysis patients. Moreover, we examined barriers that preclude patients from choosing home dialysis | ||
| 520 | |a METHODS: This was a single-center, retrospective study looking at patients who were referred to the CKD educator for dialysis modality education between January 1, 2019, and March 31, 2020. Patient demographics, preferred language of communication, stage of renal disease, and reasons for patients' refusal to undertake a home dialysis modality were recorded. Patients' average household income and driving distance to our home dialysis unit were calculated using their home zip code | ||
| 520 | |a RESULTS: 167 patients were referred for CKD education. Mean age was 60 years, and 59% male, 42% African American, 22% White, 7% Asian, and 28% were Hispanic or Latino. Only 23% of the total cohort chose in-center HD, while 74% chose a home dialysis modality (59% PD and 15% HHD), and the remaining patients remained undecided. 56% of in-center HD patients chose a home dialysis modality. The most commonly cited barriers to home dialysis were lack of a care partner, lack of home space, and patient preference | ||
| 520 | |a LIMITATIONS: Over 90% of our patients reside in NY City where home space is limited. We require in our home HD program that patients have a trained care partner present during their treatments. We cannot assume that all CKD stage-4 patients or higher were either referred for CKD education or followed through on the referral | ||
| 520 | |a CONCLUSIONS: A large discrepancy between informed patients' choices and the reality of the current dialysis landscape. Absence of a care partner, lack of home space, and patients not deemed appropriate surgical candidates were the main driving forces in their not opting for a home modality | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Journal Article | |
| 650 | 4 | |a CKD education | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Home dialysis | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Home hemodialysis | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Patient choices | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Peritoneal dialysis | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Muller, Tamara |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Tokita, Joji |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Cummings, Yvette |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Sharma, Shuchita |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Uribarri, Jaime |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Blood purification |d 1993 |g 50(2021), 6 vom: 31., Seite 818-822 |w (DE-627)NLM012656127 |x 1421-9735 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:50 |g year:2021 |g number:6 |g day:31 |g pages:818-822 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u http://dx.doi.org/10.1159/000512539 |3 Volltext |
| 912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_NLM | ||
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| 952 | |d 50 |j 2021 |e 6 |b 31 |h 818-822 | ||