Eosinopenia <100/μL as a marker of active COVID-19 : An observational prospective study
Copyright © 2021. Published by Elsevier B.V..
OBJECTIVES: To analyse the diagnostic performance of eosinopenia, alone or combined with polymorphonuclear neutrophils (PMN) and/or lymphocytes, as a marker of active COVID-19 in patients hospitalized for suspicion of SARS-CoV-2 infection.
METHODS: A prospective observational study including patients hospitalized for suspicion of COVID-19 in a COVID unit was performed from 20th March to 5th April 2020, in Perpignan, France. Patients for which there was a doubt upon diagnosis, who were recently under oral corticosteroids, had myeloid malignancy or human immunodeficient virus infection were excluded. SARS-CoV-2 detection was performed using an RT-PCR assay, from nasopharyngeal swab specimens. Complete blood count were performed for all patients.
RESULTS: One-hundred and twenty-one patient were included: 57 patients were diagnosed with COVID-19, 64 patients were not. Eosinophil count was lower in the COVID-19 group (median: 0/μL versus 70/μL, p < 0.0001). To diagnose COVID-19, eosinopenia had a sensitivity of 89.5% and a specificity of 78.1% while lymphopenia's were 73.7% and 62.5% respectively. Using area under curve (AUC) of receiving operating characteristics (ROC) curves, eosinophil's optimal cut-off level was 10/μL, sensitivity and specificity were 86%, and 79.7% respectively. Regarding the eosinophil/PMN ratio, the optimal cut-off level was 3.344, sensitivity and specificity were 87.7% and 73.4% respectively. The AUC of lymphocyte/PMN ratio was significantly lower than eosinophil/PMN ratio's (0.621 versus 0.846, p = 0.0003).
CONCLUSION: Eosinopenia - <10/μL - and eosinophil/PMN ratio are useful, low-cost, reproducible tools to help diagnose COVID-19, during an epidemic period, in a population of hospitalized patients admitted for suspicion of COVID-19.
Medienart: |
E-Artikel |
---|
Erscheinungsjahr: |
2021 |
---|---|
Erschienen: |
2021 |
Enthalten in: |
Zur Gesamtaufnahme - volume:54 |
---|---|
Enthalten in: |
Journal of microbiology, immunology, and infection = Wei mian yu gan ran za zhi - 54(2021), 1 vom: 16. Feb., Seite 61-68 |
Sprache: |
Englisch |
---|
Beteiligte Personen: |
Outh, Roderau [VerfasserIn] |
---|
Links: |
---|
Themen: |
Biomarkers |
---|
Anmerkungen: |
Date Completed 17.03.2021 Date Revised 17.03.2021 published: Print-Electronic Citation Status MEDLINE |
---|
doi: |
10.1016/j.jmii.2020.12.005 |
---|
funding: |
|
---|---|
Förderinstitution / Projekttitel: |
|
PPN (Katalog-ID): |
NLM320308529 |
---|
LEADER | 01000naa a22002652 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | NLM320308529 | ||
003 | DE-627 | ||
005 | 20231225173311.0 | ||
007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
008 | 231225s2021 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
024 | 7 | |a 10.1016/j.jmii.2020.12.005 |2 doi | |
028 | 5 | 2 | |a pubmed24n1067.xml |
035 | |a (DE-627)NLM320308529 | ||
035 | |a (NLM)33468435 | ||
035 | |a (PII)S1684-1182(21)00003-7 | ||
040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
041 | |a eng | ||
100 | 1 | |a Outh, Roderau |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 0 | |a Eosinopenia <100/μL as a marker of active COVID-19 |b An observational prospective study |
264 | 1 | |c 2021 | |
336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |a ƒaComputermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |a ƒa Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
500 | |a Date Completed 17.03.2021 | ||
500 | |a Date Revised 17.03.2021 | ||
500 | |a published: Print-Electronic | ||
500 | |a Citation Status MEDLINE | ||
520 | |a Copyright © 2021. Published by Elsevier B.V. | ||
520 | |a OBJECTIVES: To analyse the diagnostic performance of eosinopenia, alone or combined with polymorphonuclear neutrophils (PMN) and/or lymphocytes, as a marker of active COVID-19 in patients hospitalized for suspicion of SARS-CoV-2 infection | ||
520 | |a METHODS: A prospective observational study including patients hospitalized for suspicion of COVID-19 in a COVID unit was performed from 20th March to 5th April 2020, in Perpignan, France. Patients for which there was a doubt upon diagnosis, who were recently under oral corticosteroids, had myeloid malignancy or human immunodeficient virus infection were excluded. SARS-CoV-2 detection was performed using an RT-PCR assay, from nasopharyngeal swab specimens. Complete blood count were performed for all patients | ||
520 | |a RESULTS: One-hundred and twenty-one patient were included: 57 patients were diagnosed with COVID-19, 64 patients were not. Eosinophil count was lower in the COVID-19 group (median: 0/μL versus 70/μL, p < 0.0001). To diagnose COVID-19, eosinopenia had a sensitivity of 89.5% and a specificity of 78.1% while lymphopenia's were 73.7% and 62.5% respectively. Using area under curve (AUC) of receiving operating characteristics (ROC) curves, eosinophil's optimal cut-off level was 10/μL, sensitivity and specificity were 86%, and 79.7% respectively. Regarding the eosinophil/PMN ratio, the optimal cut-off level was 3.344, sensitivity and specificity were 87.7% and 73.4% respectively. The AUC of lymphocyte/PMN ratio was significantly lower than eosinophil/PMN ratio's (0.621 versus 0.846, p = 0.0003) | ||
520 | |a CONCLUSION: Eosinopenia - <10/μL - and eosinophil/PMN ratio are useful, low-cost, reproducible tools to help diagnose COVID-19, during an epidemic period, in a population of hospitalized patients admitted for suspicion of COVID-19 | ||
650 | 4 | |a Journal Article | |
650 | 4 | |a Observational Study | |
650 | 4 | |a COVID-19 | |
650 | 4 | |a Eosinopenia | |
650 | 4 | |a Marker | |
650 | 4 | |a SARS-CoV-2 | |
650 | 7 | |a Biomarkers |2 NLM | |
700 | 1 | |a Boutin, Caroline |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Gueudet, Philippe |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Suzuki, Marcelino |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Saada, Matthieu |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Aumaître, Hugues |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Journal of microbiology, immunology, and infection = Wei mian yu gan ran za zhi |d 1998 |g 54(2021), 1 vom: 16. Feb., Seite 61-68 |w (DE-627)NLM104271183 |x 1995-9133 |7 nnns |
773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:54 |g year:2021 |g number:1 |g day:16 |g month:02 |g pages:61-68 |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jmii.2020.12.005 |3 Volltext |
912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
912 | |a GBV_NLM | ||
951 | |a AR | ||
952 | |d 54 |j 2021 |e 1 |b 16 |c 02 |h 61-68 |