Restoration choices for endodontically treated posterior teeth
There aren't any generally accepted guidelines for the restoration of an endodontically treated tooth. With a questionnaire among dental general practitioners and endodontists, several restorative treatment options for endodontically treated molars and premolars were identified. The questionnaire inventoried the influence of various parameters on treatment preferences. For each case, additional questions were put about material choice, cuspal coverage and the use of root canal posts. Both groups identified the vertical root fracture as the most common reason for extraction. The dentist general practitioner waited longer than the endodontist to make a permanent restoration in the case of apical periodontitis. Treatment preferences were found to be the same for premolars and molars. In the case of premolars, a root canal post was indicated more often and the location of the wall (bearing/non-bearing) influenced the choice of cuspal coverage. Of the dentist general practitioners and endodontists, 51-53% and 75-94%, respectively, preferred a partial over a full crown preparation in the case of single-walled teeth.
Medienart: |
E-Artikel |
---|
Erscheinungsjahr: |
2021 |
---|---|
Erschienen: |
2021 |
Enthalten in: |
Zur Gesamtaufnahme - volume:128 |
---|---|
Enthalten in: |
Nederlands tijdschrift voor tandheelkunde - 128(2021), 1 vom: 15. Jan., Seite 29-40 |
Sprache: |
Niederländisch |
---|
Weiterer Titel: |
Restauratieve keuzes voor endodontisch behandelde gebits-elementen in de posterieure zone |
---|
Beteiligte Personen: |
de Kuijper, M C F M [VerfasserIn] |
---|
Links: |
---|
Themen: |
---|
Anmerkungen: |
Date Completed 19.01.2021 Date Revised 19.01.2021 published: Print Citation Status MEDLINE |
---|
doi: |
10.5177/ntvt.2021.01.20086 |
---|
funding: |
|
---|---|
Förderinstitution / Projekttitel: |
|
PPN (Katalog-ID): |
NLM320122565 |
---|
LEADER | 01000naa a22002652 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | NLM320122565 | ||
003 | DE-627 | ||
005 | 20231225172915.0 | ||
007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
008 | 231225s2021 xx |||||o 00| ||dut c | ||
024 | 7 | |a 10.5177/ntvt.2021.01.20086 |2 doi | |
028 | 5 | 2 | |a pubmed24n1067.xml |
035 | |a (DE-627)NLM320122565 | ||
035 | |a (NLM)33449054 | ||
040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
041 | |a dut | ||
100 | 1 | |a de Kuijper, M C F M |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 0 | |a Restoration choices for endodontically treated posterior teeth |
246 | 3 | 3 | |a Restauratieve keuzes voor endodontisch behandelde gebits-elementen in de posterieure zone |
264 | 1 | |c 2021 | |
336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |a ƒaComputermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |a ƒa Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
500 | |a Date Completed 19.01.2021 | ||
500 | |a Date Revised 19.01.2021 | ||
500 | |a published: Print | ||
500 | |a Citation Status MEDLINE | ||
520 | |a There aren't any generally accepted guidelines for the restoration of an endodontically treated tooth. With a questionnaire among dental general practitioners and endodontists, several restorative treatment options for endodontically treated molars and premolars were identified. The questionnaire inventoried the influence of various parameters on treatment preferences. For each case, additional questions were put about material choice, cuspal coverage and the use of root canal posts. Both groups identified the vertical root fracture as the most common reason for extraction. The dentist general practitioner waited longer than the endodontist to make a permanent restoration in the case of apical periodontitis. Treatment preferences were found to be the same for premolars and molars. In the case of premolars, a root canal post was indicated more often and the location of the wall (bearing/non-bearing) influenced the choice of cuspal coverage. Of the dentist general practitioners and endodontists, 51-53% and 75-94%, respectively, preferred a partial over a full crown preparation in the case of single-walled teeth | ||
650 | 4 | |a Journal Article | |
650 | 7 | |a Composite Resins |2 NLM | |
700 | 1 | |a van den Breemer, C R G |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Nobel, J |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Gresnigt, M M M |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Cune, M S |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Nederlands tijdschrift voor tandheelkunde |d 1962 |g 128(2021), 1 vom: 15. Jan., Seite 29-40 |w (DE-627)NLM000456926 |x 0028-2200 |7 nnns |
773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:128 |g year:2021 |g number:1 |g day:15 |g month:01 |g pages:29-40 |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u http://dx.doi.org/10.5177/ntvt.2021.01.20086 |3 Volltext |
912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
912 | |a GBV_NLM | ||
951 | |a AR | ||
952 | |d 128 |j 2021 |e 1 |b 15 |c 01 |h 29-40 |