Comparative Effect of Propofol and Volatile Anesthetics on Postoperative Pulmonary Complications After Lung Resection Surgery : A Randomized Clinical Trial
Copyright © 2021 International Anesthesia Research Society..
BACKGROUND: The effect of general anesthetics (propofol and volatile anesthetics) on pulmonary outcome after lung resection surgery with one-lung ventilation (OLV) is yet undetermined. We evaluated the effect of intravenous anesthesia (propofol) and volatile anesthesia (sevoflurane or desflurane) regimens on postoperative pulmonary complications (PPCs) in patients undergoing lung resection surgery.
METHODS: This prospective, randomized controlled trial enrolled 555 adult patients scheduled for lung resection surgery with OLV. Participants were randomized to 1 of 3 general anesthetic regimens (propofol, sevoflurane, or desflurane). Standard anesthesia and ventilation protocols were followed in all groups. The primary outcome was a composite of PPCs in the first 7 postoperative days. Secondary outcomes included the severity of PPCs and major postoperative complications classification. Intergroup difference in the primary outcome was assessed for significance using the Pearson χ2 test.
RESULTS: Of 837 patients who were assessed for eligibility, 555 were randomized and 545 were analyzed. One hundred and seventy-nine patients were assigned to the propofol group, 182 in the sevoflurane group, and 184 in the desflurane group. The incidence of PPCs did not differ between the combined volatile anesthetics (sevoflurane and desflurane) group and the propofol group (21.9% vs 24.0%; odds ratio, 0.89; 95% confidence interval, 0.58-1.35; P = .570). The PPCs grade and Clavien-Dindo scores did not differ significantly across groups.
CONCLUSIONS: In patients undergoing lung resection surgery with OLV, general anesthesia with volatile anesthetics (sevoflurane or desflurane) did not reduce PPCs compared with propofol. No difference in secondary outcomes was observed.
| Medienart: |
E-Artikel |
|---|
| Erscheinungsjahr: |
2021 |
|---|---|
| Erschienen: |
2021 |
| Enthalten in: |
Zur Gesamtaufnahme - volume:133 |
|---|---|
| Enthalten in: |
Anesthesia and analgesia - 133(2021), 4 vom: 01. Okt., Seite 949-957 |
| Sprache: |
Englisch |
|---|
| Beteiligte Personen: |
Li, Xue-Fei [VerfasserIn] |
|---|
| Links: |
|---|
| Themen: |
38LVP0K73A |
|---|
| Anmerkungen: |
Date Completed 22.11.2021 Date Revised 21.07.2023 published: Print Citation Status MEDLINE |
|---|
| doi: |
10.1213/ANE.0000000000005334 |
|---|
| funding: |
|
|---|---|
| Förderinstitution / Projekttitel: |
|
| PPN (Katalog-ID): |
NLM319743373 |
|---|
| LEADER | 01000naa a22002652 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | NLM319743373 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20231225172110.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 231225s2021 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1213/ANE.0000000000005334 |2 doi | |
| 028 | 5 | 2 | |a pubmed24n1065.xml |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)NLM319743373 | ||
| 035 | |a (NLM)33410611 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Li, Xue-Fei |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Comparative Effect of Propofol and Volatile Anesthetics on Postoperative Pulmonary Complications After Lung Resection Surgery |b A Randomized Clinical Trial |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2021 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a ƒaComputermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a ƒa Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 500 | |a Date Completed 22.11.2021 | ||
| 500 | |a Date Revised 21.07.2023 | ||
| 500 | |a published: Print | ||
| 500 | |a Citation Status MEDLINE | ||
| 520 | |a Copyright © 2021 International Anesthesia Research Society. | ||
| 520 | |a BACKGROUND: The effect of general anesthetics (propofol and volatile anesthetics) on pulmonary outcome after lung resection surgery with one-lung ventilation (OLV) is yet undetermined. We evaluated the effect of intravenous anesthesia (propofol) and volatile anesthesia (sevoflurane or desflurane) regimens on postoperative pulmonary complications (PPCs) in patients undergoing lung resection surgery | ||
| 520 | |a METHODS: This prospective, randomized controlled trial enrolled 555 adult patients scheduled for lung resection surgery with OLV. Participants were randomized to 1 of 3 general anesthetic regimens (propofol, sevoflurane, or desflurane). Standard anesthesia and ventilation protocols were followed in all groups. The primary outcome was a composite of PPCs in the first 7 postoperative days. Secondary outcomes included the severity of PPCs and major postoperative complications classification. Intergroup difference in the primary outcome was assessed for significance using the Pearson χ2 test | ||
| 520 | |a RESULTS: Of 837 patients who were assessed for eligibility, 555 were randomized and 545 were analyzed. One hundred and seventy-nine patients were assigned to the propofol group, 182 in the sevoflurane group, and 184 in the desflurane group. The incidence of PPCs did not differ between the combined volatile anesthetics (sevoflurane and desflurane) group and the propofol group (21.9% vs 24.0%; odds ratio, 0.89; 95% confidence interval, 0.58-1.35; P = .570). The PPCs grade and Clavien-Dindo scores did not differ significantly across groups | ||
| 520 | |a CONCLUSIONS: In patients undergoing lung resection surgery with OLV, general anesthesia with volatile anesthetics (sevoflurane or desflurane) did not reduce PPCs compared with propofol. No difference in secondary outcomes was observed | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Comparative Study | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Journal Article | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Randomized Controlled Trial | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Anesthetics, Inhalation |2 NLM | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Anesthetics, Intravenous |2 NLM | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Sevoflurane |2 NLM | |
| 650 | 7 | |a 38LVP0K73A |2 NLM | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Desflurane |2 NLM | |
| 650 | 7 | |a CRS35BZ94Q |2 NLM | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Propofol |2 NLM | |
| 650 | 7 | |a YI7VU623SF |2 NLM | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Hu, Jian-Rong |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Wu, Yan |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Chen, Ying |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Zhang, Meng-Qiu |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Yu, Hai |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Anesthesia and analgesia |d 1957 |g 133(2021), 4 vom: 01. Okt., Seite 949-957 |w (DE-627)NLM000025844 |x 1526-7598 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:133 |g year:2021 |g number:4 |g day:01 |g month:10 |g pages:949-957 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u http://dx.doi.org/10.1213/ANE.0000000000005334 |3 Volltext |
| 912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_NLM | ||
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| 952 | |d 133 |j 2021 |e 4 |b 01 |c 10 |h 949-957 | ||