Establishing the validity of surface topography for assessment of scoliosis : a prospective study
STUDY DESIGN: Descriptive survey.
OBJECTIVES: Compare radiographic parameters measured using surface topography (ST) with those obtained radiographically to determine the validity of ST for scoliotic assessment.
METHODS: While anterior-posterior radiography is the gold standard for diagnosing scoliosis, repeated radiographic use is associated with increased carcinogenicity. Studies have thus focused on radiation-free systems, including ST, to calculate the scoliotic angle. Seventeen patients ages 25-76 were included. Each patient received one AP radiograph and three repeated ST measurements over two months. Values were analyzed by two raters to determine comparability between ST and radiographic measurements. Interobserver reliability (ICC) was calculated and statistical significance was determined by the p-value of a paired two-tailed t-test.
RESULTS: ICC showed excellent reliability (> 0.90). There was no significant difference (p > 0.40) in apical vertebral deviation/translation between conventional radiography (0.9 ± 0.8) and ST (1.2 ± 1.0). There was no significant difference (p > 0.30) in sagittal balance radiographic (4.0 ± 3.1) and ST (4.4 ± 3.3), and coronal balance radiographic (1.4 ± 1.3) and ST (1.1 ± 1.1) measurements. Significant difference (p < .001) was found between lumbar lordosis radiographic (52.6 ± 18.4) and ST (37.9 ± 16.6), kyphotic angle radiographic (35.1 ± 16.0) and ST (50.0 ± 11.9), and scoliotic angle radiographic (11.3 ± 12.4) and ST (17.7 ± 10.2) measurements.
CONCLUSIONS: No significant difference was observed between various ST and radiographic measurements, including apical vertebral deviation, sagittal balance, and coronal balance. While a larger prospective study is needed to further assess the validity of ST, these initial measurements suggest the possibility of an effective and radiation-free adjunctive method of assessing balance in the coronal plane.
| Medienart: |
E-Artikel |
|---|
| Erscheinungsjahr: |
2021 |
|---|---|
| Erschienen: |
2021 |
| Enthalten in: |
Zur Gesamtaufnahme - volume:9 |
|---|---|
| Enthalten in: |
Spine deformity - 9(2021), 3 vom: 05. Mai, Seite 685-689 |
| Sprache: |
Englisch |
|---|
| Beteiligte Personen: |
Applebaum, Ariella [VerfasserIn] |
|---|
| Links: |
|---|
| Themen: |
Journal Article |
|---|
| Anmerkungen: |
Date Completed 18.11.2021 Date Revised 18.11.2021 published: Print-Electronic Citation Status MEDLINE |
|---|
| doi: |
10.1007/s43390-020-00260-9 |
|---|
| funding: |
|
|---|---|
| Förderinstitution / Projekttitel: |
|
| PPN (Katalog-ID): |
NLM319641074 |
|---|
| LEADER | 01000naa a22002652 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | NLM319641074 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20231225171901.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 231225s2021 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1007/s43390-020-00260-9 |2 doi | |
| 028 | 5 | 2 | |a pubmed24n1065.xml |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)NLM319641074 | ||
| 035 | |a (NLM)33400233 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Applebaum, Ariella |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Establishing the validity of surface topography for assessment of scoliosis |b a prospective study |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2021 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a ƒaComputermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a ƒa Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 500 | |a Date Completed 18.11.2021 | ||
| 500 | |a Date Revised 18.11.2021 | ||
| 500 | |a published: Print-Electronic | ||
| 500 | |a Citation Status MEDLINE | ||
| 520 | |a STUDY DESIGN: Descriptive survey | ||
| 520 | |a OBJECTIVES: Compare radiographic parameters measured using surface topography (ST) with those obtained radiographically to determine the validity of ST for scoliotic assessment | ||
| 520 | |a METHODS: While anterior-posterior radiography is the gold standard for diagnosing scoliosis, repeated radiographic use is associated with increased carcinogenicity. Studies have thus focused on radiation-free systems, including ST, to calculate the scoliotic angle. Seventeen patients ages 25-76 were included. Each patient received one AP radiograph and three repeated ST measurements over two months. Values were analyzed by two raters to determine comparability between ST and radiographic measurements. Interobserver reliability (ICC) was calculated and statistical significance was determined by the p-value of a paired two-tailed t-test | ||
| 520 | |a RESULTS: ICC showed excellent reliability (> 0.90). There was no significant difference (p > 0.40) in apical vertebral deviation/translation between conventional radiography (0.9 ± 0.8) and ST (1.2 ± 1.0). There was no significant difference (p > 0.30) in sagittal balance radiographic (4.0 ± 3.1) and ST (4.4 ± 3.3), and coronal balance radiographic (1.4 ± 1.3) and ST (1.1 ± 1.1) measurements. Significant difference (p < .001) was found between lumbar lordosis radiographic (52.6 ± 18.4) and ST (37.9 ± 16.6), kyphotic angle radiographic (35.1 ± 16.0) and ST (50.0 ± 11.9), and scoliotic angle radiographic (11.3 ± 12.4) and ST (17.7 ± 10.2) measurements | ||
| 520 | |a CONCLUSIONS: No significant difference was observed between various ST and radiographic measurements, including apical vertebral deviation, sagittal balance, and coronal balance. While a larger prospective study is needed to further assess the validity of ST, these initial measurements suggest the possibility of an effective and radiation-free adjunctive method of assessing balance in the coronal plane | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Journal Article | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Radiography | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Scoliosis | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Spinal deformity | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Surface topography | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Cho, Woojin |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Nessim, Adam |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Kim, Keonhee |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Tarpada, Sandip P |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Yoon, Seung Ho |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Pujar, Beendu |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Kim, Dongyoung |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Kim, Soo Yeon |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Spine deformity |d 2013 |g 9(2021), 3 vom: 05. Mai, Seite 685-689 |w (DE-627)NLM25039989X |x 2212-1358 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:9 |g year:2021 |g number:3 |g day:05 |g month:05 |g pages:685-689 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s43390-020-00260-9 |3 Volltext |
| 912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_NLM | ||
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| 952 | |d 9 |j 2021 |e 3 |b 05 |c 05 |h 685-689 | ||