Decontamination and re-use of surgical masks and respirators during the COVID-19 pandemic

Copyright © 2020. Published by Elsevier Ltd..

OBJECTIVES: The coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic increased global demand for personal protective equipment (PPE) and resulted in shortages. The study evaluated the re-use of surgical masks and respirators by analysing their performance and safety before and after reprocessing using the following methods: oven, thermal drying, autoclave, and hydrogen peroxide plasma vapour.

METHODS: In total, 45 surgical masks and 69 respirators were decontaminated. Visual integrity, air permeability, burst resistance, pressure differential and particulate filtration efficiency of new and decontaminated surgical masks and respirators were evaluated. In addition, 14 used respirators were analysed after work shifts before and after decontamination using reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) and viral culturing. Finally, reprocessed respirators were evaluated by users in terms of functionality and comfort.

RESULTS: Oven decontamination (75 °C for 45 min) was found to be the simplest decontamination method. Physical and filtration assays indicated that all reprocessing methods were safe after one cycle. Oven decontamination maintained the characteristics of surgical masks and respirators for at least five reprocessing cycles. Viral RNA was detected by RT-PCR in two of the 14 used respirators. Four respirators submitted to viral culture were PCR-negative and culture-negative. Reprocessed respirators used in work shifts were evaluated positively by users, even after three decontamination cycles.

CONCLUSION: Oven decontamination is a safe method for reprocessing surgical masks and respirators for at least five cycles, and is feasible in the hospital setting.

Medienart:

E-Artikel

Erscheinungsjahr:

2021

Erschienen:

2021

Enthalten in:

Zur Gesamtaufnahme - volume:104

Enthalten in:

International journal of infectious diseases : IJID : official publication of the International Society for Infectious Diseases - 104(2021) vom: 15. März, Seite 320-328

Sprache:

Englisch

Beteiligte Personen:

Côrtes, Marina Farrel [VerfasserIn]
Espinoza, Evelyn Patricia Sanchez [VerfasserIn]
Noguera, Saidy Liceth Vásconez [VerfasserIn]
Silva, Aline Alves [VerfasserIn]
de Medeiros, Marion Elke Sielfeld Araya [VerfasserIn]
Villas Boas, Lucy Santos [VerfasserIn]
Ferreira, Noely Evangelista [VerfasserIn]
Tozetto-Mendoza, Tania Regina [VerfasserIn]
Morais, Fernando Gonçalves [VerfasserIn]
de Queiroz, Rayana Santiago [VerfasserIn]
de Proenca, Adriana Coracini Tonacio [VerfasserIn]
Guimaraes, Thais [VerfasserIn]
Guedes, Ana Rubia [VerfasserIn]
Letaif, Leila Suemi Harima [VerfasserIn]
Montal, Amanda Cardoso [VerfasserIn]
Mendes-Correa, Maria Cassia [VerfasserIn]
John, Vanderley M [VerfasserIn]
Levin, Anna S [VerfasserIn]
Costa, Silvia Figueiredo [VerfasserIn]

Links:

Volltext

Themen:

BBX060AN9V
COVID-19
Comparative Study
Hydrogen Peroxide
Journal Article
Mask reuse
Respirators
SARS-CoV-2 pandemic
Surgical masks

Anmerkungen:

Date Completed 11.05.2021

Date Revised 10.11.2023

published: Print-Electronic

Citation Status MEDLINE

doi:

10.1016/j.ijid.2020.12.056

funding:

Förderinstitution / Projekttitel:

PPN (Katalog-ID):

NLM319242803