Price Differences Between Otic and Ophthalmic Drops
Copyright © 2020, Otology & Neurotology, Inc..
OBJECTIVE: Otic drops are one of the most frequently prescribed medications in otolaryngology. However, some forms of these drops can be very expensive, and ophthalmic formulations are sometimes used by practitioners to decrease the cost for their patients. The goal of this study is to determine the cost differential between otic and ophthalmic drops.
METHODS: Pharmacies in New York City, Chicago, and Portland were surveyed in the span of 6 weeks by telephone to evaluate the current prices of various otic and ophthalmic drops commonly prescribed by otolaryngologists.
RESULTS: A total of 83 pharmacies were surveyed. Surveyed drugs included ciprofloxacin/dexamethasone (cip/dex) otic, neomycin/polymyxin B sulfates/hydrocortisone (neo/poly/HC) otic, acetic acid (AA) otic, acetic acid/hydrocortisone (AA/HC) otic, ofloxacin otic, ofloxacin ophthalmic, and tobramycin/dexamethasone (tob/dex) ophthalmic. Per milliliter, cip/dex otic was consistently the most expensive, with a median price of $38.00 per milliliter. Among the antibiotic drops, neo/poly/HC otic was the least expensive formulation with a median price of $11.60 per milliliter. Ofloxacin ophthalmic was significantly less expensive than the otic formulation, at $11.00 and $31.00 per milliliter, respectively (adjusted p < 0.001). In general, otic and ophthalmic formulations were not significantly different according to manufacturing information, although ophthalmic drops were more often packaged in a sterile fashion and with less abrasive ingredients for use in the more sensitive tissue of the eye.
CONCLUSION: Significant and meaningful price differences exist between otic and ophthalmic drops. Given the safety of ophthalmic drops used in the ears, they may be a more cost-effective alternative to traditionally prescribed otic drops when clinically appropriate.
Medienart: |
E-Artikel |
---|
Erscheinungsjahr: |
2021 |
---|---|
Erschienen: |
2021 |
Enthalten in: |
Zur Gesamtaufnahme - volume:42 |
---|---|
Enthalten in: |
Otology & neurotology : official publication of the American Otological Society, American Neurotology Society [and] European Academy of Otology and Neurotology - 42(2021), 2 vom: 01. Feb., Seite 274-277 |
Sprache: |
Englisch |
---|
Beteiligte Personen: |
Valentini, Chris [VerfasserIn] |
---|
Links: |
---|
Themen: |
5E8K9I0O4U |
---|
Anmerkungen: |
Date Completed 21.04.2021 Date Revised 21.08.2023 published: Print Citation Status MEDLINE |
---|
doi: |
10.1097/MAO.0000000000002930 |
---|
funding: |
|
---|---|
Förderinstitution / Projekttitel: |
|
PPN (Katalog-ID): |
NLM319161013 |
---|
LEADER | 01000naa a22002652 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | NLM319161013 | ||
003 | DE-627 | ||
005 | 20231225170848.0 | ||
007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
008 | 231225s2021 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
024 | 7 | |a 10.1097/MAO.0000000000002930 |2 doi | |
028 | 5 | 2 | |a pubmed24n1063.xml |
035 | |a (DE-627)NLM319161013 | ||
035 | |a (NLM)33351562 | ||
040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
041 | |a eng | ||
100 | 1 | |a Valentini, Chris |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 0 | |a Price Differences Between Otic and Ophthalmic Drops |
264 | 1 | |c 2021 | |
336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |a ƒaComputermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |a ƒa Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
500 | |a Date Completed 21.04.2021 | ||
500 | |a Date Revised 21.08.2023 | ||
500 | |a published: Print | ||
500 | |a Citation Status MEDLINE | ||
520 | |a Copyright © 2020, Otology & Neurotology, Inc. | ||
520 | |a OBJECTIVE: Otic drops are one of the most frequently prescribed medications in otolaryngology. However, some forms of these drops can be very expensive, and ophthalmic formulations are sometimes used by practitioners to decrease the cost for their patients. The goal of this study is to determine the cost differential between otic and ophthalmic drops | ||
520 | |a METHODS: Pharmacies in New York City, Chicago, and Portland were surveyed in the span of 6 weeks by telephone to evaluate the current prices of various otic and ophthalmic drops commonly prescribed by otolaryngologists | ||
520 | |a RESULTS: A total of 83 pharmacies were surveyed. Surveyed drugs included ciprofloxacin/dexamethasone (cip/dex) otic, neomycin/polymyxin B sulfates/hydrocortisone (neo/poly/HC) otic, acetic acid (AA) otic, acetic acid/hydrocortisone (AA/HC) otic, ofloxacin otic, ofloxacin ophthalmic, and tobramycin/dexamethasone (tob/dex) ophthalmic. Per milliliter, cip/dex otic was consistently the most expensive, with a median price of $38.00 per milliliter. Among the antibiotic drops, neo/poly/HC otic was the least expensive formulation with a median price of $11.60 per milliliter. Ofloxacin ophthalmic was significantly less expensive than the otic formulation, at $11.00 and $31.00 per milliliter, respectively (adjusted p < 0.001). In general, otic and ophthalmic formulations were not significantly different according to manufacturing information, although ophthalmic drops were more often packaged in a sterile fashion and with less abrasive ingredients for use in the more sensitive tissue of the eye | ||
520 | |a CONCLUSION: Significant and meaningful price differences exist between otic and ophthalmic drops. Given the safety of ophthalmic drops used in the ears, they may be a more cost-effective alternative to traditionally prescribed otic drops when clinically appropriate | ||
650 | 4 | |a Journal Article | |
650 | 7 | |a Anti-Bacterial Agents |2 NLM | |
650 | 7 | |a Ciprofloxacin |2 NLM | |
650 | 7 | |a 5E8K9I0O4U |2 NLM | |
650 | 7 | |a Dexamethasone |2 NLM | |
650 | 7 | |a 7S5I7G3JQL |2 NLM | |
650 | 7 | |a Ofloxacin |2 NLM | |
650 | 7 | |a A4P49JAZ9H |2 NLM | |
700 | 1 | |a Lin, Jiahui |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Golub, Justin S |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Lustig, Lawrence |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Otology & neurotology : official publication of the American Otological Society, American Neurotology Society [and] European Academy of Otology and Neurotology |d 2001 |g 42(2021), 2 vom: 01. Feb., Seite 274-277 |w (DE-627)NLM11209144X |x 1537-4505 |7 nnns |
773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:42 |g year:2021 |g number:2 |g day:01 |g month:02 |g pages:274-277 |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MAO.0000000000002930 |3 Volltext |
912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
912 | |a GBV_NLM | ||
951 | |a AR | ||
952 | |d 42 |j 2021 |e 2 |b 01 |c 02 |h 274-277 |