Antimicrobial Dressing versus Standard Dressing in Obese Women Undergoing Cesarean Delivery : A Randomized Controlled Trial
The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)..
OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate the effect of a novel antimicrobial dressing on patient satisfaction and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) following a cesarean delivery.
STUDY DESIGN: This was an open-label, single-center, two-arm randomized controlled trial. This study was done at the tertiary center, maternal unit, Galveston, TX. Pregnant women with body mass indices ≥35 kg/m2 were screened for eligibility. Women were randomized to ReliaTect Post-Op Dressing (RELIATECT) or standard wound dressing (STANDARD). Primary outcome was patient satisfaction and HRQoL using validated questionnaires. Secondary outcomes were provider satisfaction, surgical site infection (SSI) rates, and wound complications.
RESULTS: In total, 160 women were randomized. Population characteristics were not significant among groups. RELIATECT dressing group had an overall higher score of satisfaction and HRQoL compared with STANDARD group. Women in the RELIATECT group reported less incision odor and incisional pain. Compared with the STANDARD group, most women in RELIATECT dressing group reported better daily activities, self-esteem, personal hygiene, body image, and sleep. Providers reported that the RELIATECT dressing allowed better assessment of the surgical incision site, allowed patients to shower early, and did observe less wound dressing leakage. No differences were found in other secondary end points.
CONCLUSION: Postcesarean RELIATECT dressing for wound care in pregnant women with obesity had better patient and provider satisfaction as well as better HRQoL scores. Further, level 1 evidence is needed to assess its impact on SSI rates and wound complication, as this trial was not powered to accomplish this goal.
KEY POINTS: · This study was conducted to evaluate RELIATECT on patient satisfaction and HRQoL following a cesarean.. · Post-cesarean RELIATECT dressing for wound care had better HRQoL and patient and provider satisfaction scores.. · This is the first randomized controlled trial evaluating RELIATECT dressing in obese pregnant women undergoing cesarean section.
| Medienart: |
E-Artikel |
|---|
| Erscheinungsjahr: |
2022 |
|---|---|
| Erschienen: |
2022 |
| Enthalten in: |
Zur Gesamtaufnahme - volume:39 |
|---|---|
| Enthalten in: |
American journal of perinatology - 39(2022), 9 vom: 02. Juli, Seite 951-958 |
| Sprache: |
Englisch |
|---|
| Beteiligte Personen: |
Saad, Antonio F [VerfasserIn] |
|---|
| Links: |
|---|
| Themen: |
Anti-Bacterial Agents |
|---|
| Anmerkungen: |
Date Completed 28.07.2022 Date Revised 12.08.2022 published: Print-Electronic ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT03887299 Citation Status MEDLINE |
|---|
| doi: |
10.1055/s-0040-1721112 |
|---|
| funding: |
|
|---|---|
| Förderinstitution / Projekttitel: |
|
| PPN (Katalog-ID): |
NLM318309939 |
|---|
| LEADER | 01000naa a22002652 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | NLM318309939 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20231225165102.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 231225s2022 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1055/s-0040-1721112 |2 doi | |
| 028 | 5 | 2 | |a pubmed24n1060.xml |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)NLM318309939 | ||
| 035 | |a (NLM)33264808 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Saad, Antonio F |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Antimicrobial Dressing versus Standard Dressing in Obese Women Undergoing Cesarean Delivery |b A Randomized Controlled Trial |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2022 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a ƒaComputermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a ƒa Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 500 | |a Date Completed 28.07.2022 | ||
| 500 | |a Date Revised 12.08.2022 | ||
| 500 | |a published: Print-Electronic | ||
| 500 | |a ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT03887299 | ||
| 500 | |a Citation Status MEDLINE | ||
| 520 | |a The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). | ||
| 520 | |a OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate the effect of a novel antimicrobial dressing on patient satisfaction and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) following a cesarean delivery | ||
| 520 | |a STUDY DESIGN: This was an open-label, single-center, two-arm randomized controlled trial. This study was done at the tertiary center, maternal unit, Galveston, TX. Pregnant women with body mass indices ≥35 kg/m2 were screened for eligibility. Women were randomized to ReliaTect Post-Op Dressing (RELIATECT) or standard wound dressing (STANDARD). Primary outcome was patient satisfaction and HRQoL using validated questionnaires. Secondary outcomes were provider satisfaction, surgical site infection (SSI) rates, and wound complications | ||
| 520 | |a RESULTS: In total, 160 women were randomized. Population characteristics were not significant among groups. RELIATECT dressing group had an overall higher score of satisfaction and HRQoL compared with STANDARD group. Women in the RELIATECT group reported less incision odor and incisional pain. Compared with the STANDARD group, most women in RELIATECT dressing group reported better daily activities, self-esteem, personal hygiene, body image, and sleep. Providers reported that the RELIATECT dressing allowed better assessment of the surgical incision site, allowed patients to shower early, and did observe less wound dressing leakage. No differences were found in other secondary end points | ||
| 520 | |a CONCLUSION: Postcesarean RELIATECT dressing for wound care in pregnant women with obesity had better patient and provider satisfaction as well as better HRQoL scores. Further, level 1 evidence is needed to assess its impact on SSI rates and wound complication, as this trial was not powered to accomplish this goal | ||
| 520 | |a KEY POINTS: · This study was conducted to evaluate RELIATECT on patient satisfaction and HRQoL following a cesarean.. · Post-cesarean RELIATECT dressing for wound care had better HRQoL and patient and provider satisfaction scores.. · This is the first randomized controlled trial evaluating RELIATECT dressing in obese pregnant women undergoing cesarean section | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Journal Article | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Randomized Controlled Trial | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Anti-Bacterial Agents |2 NLM | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Salazar, Ashley E |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Allen, Lindsey |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Saade, George R |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t American journal of perinatology |d 1993 |g 39(2022), 9 vom: 02. Juli, Seite 951-958 |w (DE-627)NLM013020544 |x 1098-8785 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:39 |g year:2022 |g number:9 |g day:02 |g month:07 |g pages:951-958 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0040-1721112 |3 Volltext |
| 912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_NLM | ||
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| 952 | |d 39 |j 2022 |e 9 |b 02 |c 07 |h 951-958 | ||