Readability, content, and quality of COVID-19 patient education materials from academic medical centers in the United States
Copyright © 2020 Association for Professionals in Infection Control and Epidemiology, Inc. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved..
BACKGROUND: SARS-CoV-2 has spread rapidly resulted in a global pandemic and public health crisis. The internet is a frequently used resource for providing patient education materials (PEMs). The aim of this study was to evaluate the readability, content, and quality of web-based PEMs on COVID-19 from US academic medical centers.
METHODS: The names of US medical schools were obtained from the Association of American Medical Colleges website (n = 145). Institutional, hospital, and heath encyclopedia websites associated with each schools' medical center were identified using Google. Readability of COVID-19 PEMs was calculated using three validated indices: (1) Flesh-Kincaid Grade Level, (2) Simple Measure of Gobbledygook, and (3) Gunning Frequency of Gobbledygook. Content was evaluated using a scoring matrix based on materials available on the Center for Disease Control website. The Patient Education Material Assessment Tool for Print (PEMAT-P) was used to assess usability and actionability.
RESULTS: A total of 141 (97%) PEMs met inclusion criteria and were analyzed for readability, content, and quality. The mean readability was above the recommended sixth grade reading level (P < .001). Content was variable across PEMs. The PEMAT-P scores reflected good understandability with a median score of 83% (IQR 75%-87%), while actionability was poor with a median score of 41% (IQR 40%-60%).
CONCLUSIONS: Despite availability of web-based PEMs for COVID-19, the readability was significantly higher than the National Institute of Health and US Department of Health and Human Services recommended sixth grade reading level and actionability of PEMs was low. It is critical to provide readable PEMs on COVID-19 to effectively disseminate accurate information and facilitate patients' understanding of the virus, how it spreads, and how to protect themselves.
| Medienart: |
E-Artikel |
|---|
| Erscheinungsjahr: |
2021 |
|---|---|
| Erschienen: |
2021 |
| Enthalten in: |
Zur Gesamtaufnahme - volume:49 |
|---|---|
| Enthalten in: |
American journal of infection control - 49(2021), 6 vom: 30. Juni, Seite 690-693 |
| Sprache: |
Englisch |
|---|
| Beteiligte Personen: |
Kruse, Jessica [VerfasserIn] |
|---|
| Links: |
|---|
| Themen: |
|---|
| Anmerkungen: |
Date Completed 24.06.2021 Date Revised 04.02.2022 published: Print-Electronic Citation Status MEDLINE |
|---|
| doi: |
10.1016/j.ajic.2020.11.023 |
|---|
| funding: |
|
|---|---|
| Förderinstitution / Projekttitel: |
|
| PPN (Katalog-ID): |
NLM318261332 |
|---|
| LEADER | 01000naa a22002652 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | NLM318261332 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20231225165000.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 231225s2021 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1016/j.ajic.2020.11.023 |2 doi | |
| 028 | 5 | 2 | |a pubmed24n1060.xml |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)NLM318261332 | ||
| 035 | |a (NLM)33259825 | ||
| 035 | |a (PII)S0196-6553(20)31031-2 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Kruse, Jessica |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Readability, content, and quality of COVID-19 patient education materials from academic medical centers in the United States |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2021 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a ƒaComputermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a ƒa Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 500 | |a Date Completed 24.06.2021 | ||
| 500 | |a Date Revised 04.02.2022 | ||
| 500 | |a published: Print-Electronic | ||
| 500 | |a Citation Status MEDLINE | ||
| 520 | |a Copyright © 2020 Association for Professionals in Infection Control and Epidemiology, Inc. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. | ||
| 520 | |a BACKGROUND: SARS-CoV-2 has spread rapidly resulted in a global pandemic and public health crisis. The internet is a frequently used resource for providing patient education materials (PEMs). The aim of this study was to evaluate the readability, content, and quality of web-based PEMs on COVID-19 from US academic medical centers | ||
| 520 | |a METHODS: The names of US medical schools were obtained from the Association of American Medical Colleges website (n = 145). Institutional, hospital, and heath encyclopedia websites associated with each schools' medical center were identified using Google. Readability of COVID-19 PEMs was calculated using three validated indices: (1) Flesh-Kincaid Grade Level, (2) Simple Measure of Gobbledygook, and (3) Gunning Frequency of Gobbledygook. Content was evaluated using a scoring matrix based on materials available on the Center for Disease Control website. The Patient Education Material Assessment Tool for Print (PEMAT-P) was used to assess usability and actionability | ||
| 520 | |a RESULTS: A total of 141 (97%) PEMs met inclusion criteria and were analyzed for readability, content, and quality. The mean readability was above the recommended sixth grade reading level (P < .001). Content was variable across PEMs. The PEMAT-P scores reflected good understandability with a median score of 83% (IQR 75%-87%), while actionability was poor with a median score of 41% (IQR 40%-60%) | ||
| 520 | |a CONCLUSIONS: Despite availability of web-based PEMs for COVID-19, the readability was significantly higher than the National Institute of Health and US Department of Health and Human Services recommended sixth grade reading level and actionability of PEMs was low. It is critical to provide readable PEMs on COVID-19 to effectively disseminate accurate information and facilitate patients' understanding of the virus, how it spreads, and how to protect themselves | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Journal Article | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Coronavirus | |
| 650 | 4 | |a PEMs | |
| 650 | 4 | |a SARS-CoV-2 | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Toledo, Paloma |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Belton, Tayler B |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Testani, Erica J |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Evans, Charlesnika T |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Grobman, William A |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Miller, Emily S |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Lange, Elizabeth M S |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t American journal of infection control |d 1980 |g 49(2021), 6 vom: 30. Juni, Seite 690-693 |w (DE-627)NLM012639850 |x 1527-3296 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:49 |g year:2021 |g number:6 |g day:30 |g month:06 |g pages:690-693 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ajic.2020.11.023 |3 Volltext |
| 912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_NLM | ||
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| 952 | |d 49 |j 2021 |e 6 |b 30 |c 06 |h 690-693 | ||