Provider confidence in the telemedicine spine evaluation : results from a global study
© 2020. The Author(s)..
PURPOSE: To utilize data from a global spine surgeon survey to elucidate (1) overall confidence in the telemedicine evaluation and (2) determinants of provider confidence.
METHODS: Members of AO Spine International were sent a survey encompassing participant's experience with, perception of, and comparison of telemedicine to in-person visits. The survey was designed through a Delphi approach, with four rounds of question review by the multi-disciplinary authors. Data were stratified by provider age, experience, telemedicine platform, trust in telemedicine, and specialty.
RESULTS: Four hundred and eighty-five surgeons participated in the survey. The global effort included respondents from Africa (19.9%), Asia Pacific (19.7%), Europe (24.3%), North America (9.4%), and South America (26.6%). Providers felt that physical exam-based tasks (e.g., provocative testing, assessing neurologic deficits/myelopathy, etc.) were inferior to in-person exams, while communication-based aspects (e.g., history taking, imaging review, etc.) were equivalent. Participants who performed greater than 50 visits were more likely to believe telemedicine was at least equivalent to in-person visits in the ability to make an accurate diagnosis (OR 2.37, 95% C.I. 1.03-5.43). Compared to in-person encounters, video (versus phone only) visits were associated with increased confidence in the ability of telemedicine to formulate and communicate a treatment plan (OR 3.88, 95% C.I. 1.71-8.84).
CONCLUSION: Spine surgeons are confident in the ability of telemedicine to communicate with patients, but are concerned about its capacity to accurately make physical exam-based diagnoses. Future research should concentrate on standardizing the remote examination and the development of appropriate use criteria in order to increase provider confidence in telemedicine technology.
Medienart: |
E-Artikel |
---|
Erscheinungsjahr: |
2021 |
---|---|
Erschienen: |
2021 |
Enthalten in: |
Zur Gesamtaufnahme - volume:30 |
---|---|
Enthalten in: |
European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society - 30(2021), 8 vom: 22. Aug., Seite 2109-2123 |
Sprache: |
Englisch |
---|
Beteiligte Personen: |
Lovecchio, Francis [VerfasserIn] |
---|
Links: |
---|
Themen: |
Examination |
---|
Anmerkungen: |
Date Completed 22.09.2021 Date Revised 18.02.2022 published: Print-Electronic Citation Status MEDLINE |
---|
doi: |
10.1007/s00586-020-06653-8 |
---|
funding: |
|
---|---|
Förderinstitution / Projekttitel: |
|
PPN (Katalog-ID): |
NLM317890239 |
---|
LEADER | 01000naa a22002652 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | NLM317890239 | ||
003 | DE-627 | ||
005 | 20231225164218.0 | ||
007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
008 | 231225s2021 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
024 | 7 | |a 10.1007/s00586-020-06653-8 |2 doi | |
028 | 5 | 2 | |a pubmed24n1059.xml |
035 | |a (DE-627)NLM317890239 | ||
035 | |a (NLM)33222003 | ||
040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
041 | |a eng | ||
100 | 1 | |a Lovecchio, Francis |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 0 | |a Provider confidence in the telemedicine spine evaluation |b results from a global study |
264 | 1 | |c 2021 | |
336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |a ƒaComputermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |a ƒa Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
500 | |a Date Completed 22.09.2021 | ||
500 | |a Date Revised 18.02.2022 | ||
500 | |a published: Print-Electronic | ||
500 | |a Citation Status MEDLINE | ||
520 | |a © 2020. The Author(s). | ||
520 | |a PURPOSE: To utilize data from a global spine surgeon survey to elucidate (1) overall confidence in the telemedicine evaluation and (2) determinants of provider confidence | ||
520 | |a METHODS: Members of AO Spine International were sent a survey encompassing participant's experience with, perception of, and comparison of telemedicine to in-person visits. The survey was designed through a Delphi approach, with four rounds of question review by the multi-disciplinary authors. Data were stratified by provider age, experience, telemedicine platform, trust in telemedicine, and specialty | ||
520 | |a RESULTS: Four hundred and eighty-five surgeons participated in the survey. The global effort included respondents from Africa (19.9%), Asia Pacific (19.7%), Europe (24.3%), North America (9.4%), and South America (26.6%). Providers felt that physical exam-based tasks (e.g., provocative testing, assessing neurologic deficits/myelopathy, etc.) were inferior to in-person exams, while communication-based aspects (e.g., history taking, imaging review, etc.) were equivalent. Participants who performed greater than 50 visits were more likely to believe telemedicine was at least equivalent to in-person visits in the ability to make an accurate diagnosis (OR 2.37, 95% C.I. 1.03-5.43). Compared to in-person encounters, video (versus phone only) visits were associated with increased confidence in the ability of telemedicine to formulate and communicate a treatment plan (OR 3.88, 95% C.I. 1.71-8.84) | ||
520 | |a CONCLUSION: Spine surgeons are confident in the ability of telemedicine to communicate with patients, but are concerned about its capacity to accurately make physical exam-based diagnoses. Future research should concentrate on standardizing the remote examination and the development of appropriate use criteria in order to increase provider confidence in telemedicine technology | ||
650 | 4 | |a Journal Article | |
650 | 4 | |a Examination | |
650 | 4 | |a International | |
650 | 4 | |a Spine surgery | |
650 | 4 | |a Survey | |
650 | 4 | |a Telemedicine | |
700 | 1 | |a Riew, Grant J |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Samartzis, Dino |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Louie, Philip K |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Germscheid, Niccole |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a An, Howard S |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Cheung, Jason Pui Yin |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Chutkan, Norman |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Mallow, Gary Michael |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Neva, Marko H |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Phillips, Frank M |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Sciubba, Daniel M |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a El-Sharkawi, Mohammad |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Valacco, Marcelo |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a McCarthy, Michael H |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Makhni, Melvin C |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Iyer, Sravisht |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society |d 1992 |g 30(2021), 8 vom: 22. Aug., Seite 2109-2123 |w (DE-627)NLM075086719 |x 1432-0932 |7 nnns |
773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:30 |g year:2021 |g number:8 |g day:22 |g month:08 |g pages:2109-2123 |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00586-020-06653-8 |3 Volltext |
912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
912 | |a GBV_NLM | ||
951 | |a AR | ||
952 | |d 30 |j 2021 |e 8 |b 22 |c 08 |h 2109-2123 |